Environmental administration in six European states: Secular convergence or national distinctiveness?

Public Administration

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 255-274

  Weale, Albert ^c   Pridham, Geoffrey ^a   Williams, Andrea ^d   Porter, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^d LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANISATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION; NATIONAL CONTEXT; POLICY MAKING; SECULAR TREND;

EUROPE, (WEST);

EID: 0030481033     PISSN: 00333298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1996.tb00869.x     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Allison, G.T. 1971. Essence of decision. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
2. Andersen, M.S. 1994. 'From Narvik to Naples: environmental policy in an enlarged European Union'. Paper presented at the conference 'Governing Our Environment', Copenhagen, 17-18 Nov. 1994.
3. Bendor, J. and T.H. Hammond. 1992. 'Rethinking Allison's models', American Political Science Review 86, 2, 301-22.
4. Bennett, C.J. 1991. What is policy convergence and what causes it?', British Journal of Political Science 21, 2, 215-33.
5. Bennett, G. 1991. Air pollution control in the European Community: implementation of the EC directives on the twelve member states. London: Graham and Trotman.
6. Capria. A. (undated). 'Formulation and implementation of environmental policy in Italy', paper.
7. Christofilopoulou, P. 1992. 'Professionalism and public policy making in Greece: the influence of engineers in the local government reforms'. Public Administration 70, 1, 99-118.
8. Commission of the EC, DG IX. 1993. Administrative structures for environmental management in the European Community. Brussels: Commission of the EC.
9. ENDS Report. 1991. 198. July.
10. Freeman, G.P. 1985. 'National styles and policy sectors: explaining structured variation', Journal of Public Policy 5, 4, 467-96.
11. Hajer, M. 1993. The politics of environmental discourse: a study of the acid rain controversy in Great Britain and the Netherlands. D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford.
12. Hellenic Society for the Protection of the Environment and the Cultural Heritage. 1991. The state of the Greek environment. Milan: DocTer.
13. Hine, D. 1993. Governing Italy: the politics of bargained pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Jänicke, M. 1990. 'Erfolgungsbedingungen von Umweltpolitik im Internationalen Vergleich; Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik 3, 213-32.
15. Knoepful, P. and H. Weidner. 1990. 'Implementing air quality programs in Europe'. Policy Studies Journal 11, 103-15.
16. Lopez Bustos, F.L. 1992. La organization administrativa del media ambiente. Madrid: Editorial Civitas.
17. Lowi, T.J. 1964. 'American business, public policy, case studies and political theory', World Politics 6, 677-715.
18. Majone, G. 1991. 'Cross-national sources of regulatory policy making in Europe and the United States', Journal of Public Policy 11, 1 79-106.
19. _. 1993. The European Community between social policy and social regulation', Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 2, 153-70.
20. Ministero dell'Ambiente. 1992. Bilancio di un quinquennio de politiche ambientali. Rome: Ministero dell'Ambiente.
21. Moravscik, A. 1991. 'Negotiating the Single European Act', pp. 41-84 in R.O. Keohane and S. Hoffman (eds.). The new European Community. Boulder, San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press.
22. Muller, E. 1986. Innenwelt der Umweltpolitik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
23. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1983. Environmental policies in Greece. Paris: OECD.
24. O'Riordan, T. and A. Weale 1989. 'Administrative reorganization and policy change: the case of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution', Public Administration 67, 3, 277-94.
25. Pollitt, C. 1987. Manipulating the machine. London: Allen and Unwin.
26. Richardson, J.J. (ed.). 1982. Policy styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen and Unwin.
27. Ruffolo, G. 1989. Nota aggiuntiva del ministro [on the occasion of the Report on the State of the Environment in Italy]. Rome: Ministero dell'Ambiente.
28. Scharpf, F.W. 1977. 'Does organization matter? Task structure and interaction in the ministerial bureaucracy', in E.H. Burack and A. R. Negandhi (eds.). Organization design: theoretical perspectives and empirical findings. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.
29. Second Chamber of the States General. 1989. National environmental policy plan. To choose or lose, 's-Gravenhage: SDU uitgeverij.
30. Szanton, P. (ed.). 1981. Federal reorganization: what have we learned? Chatham NJ: Chatham House.
31. Tinbergen, J. 1959. The theory of the optimum regime', pp. 264-304 in L.H. Klassen, L.M. Koyck and H.J. Witteveen (eds.). Jan Tinbergen: selected papers. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
32. Tukey, E. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
33. Vogel, D. 1986. National styles of regulation. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
34. Weale, A., T. O'Riordan and L. Kramme. 1991. Controlling pollution in the round. London: AngloGerman Foundation.
35. _. 1992. The new politics of pollution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.