Dynamic low back functional motion capacity evaluation

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 203-214

  Ferguson, S A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

dynamic functional motion capacity; low back pain; trunk measurement

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTION; TRUNK; VELOCITY;

EID: 0030480468     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02110883     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andersson GBJ. Epdemiological aspects of low-back pain in industry. Spine 1981; 6: 53-60.
2. Krusen E, Ford D. Compensation factors in low back injures. JAMA 1958; 3: 1128-1133.
3. Haddod G. Analysis of 2932 worker's comp back injury cases. The impact of the cost to the system. Spine 1987; 12: 765-769.
4. Bigos S, Spengler D, Martin N, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A. Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study II. injury factors. Spine 1986; 11: 246-251.
5. Riihimaki H, Viikari-Juntura E, Moneta G, Kuha J, Videman T, Tola S. Incidence of sciatic pain among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. Spine 1994; 19: 138-142.
6. Nelson R, Nester D. Standardized assessment of industrial low-back injuries: Development of the NIOSH low-back atlas. Topics Acute Care Trauma Rehab 1988; 2: 16-30
7. Tramposh A. The functional capacity evaluation: Measuring maximal work abilities. Occup Med: State of the Art Review 1988; 7: 113-124.
8. Mayer T, Gatchel R. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1988.
9. Isernhagen S. Functional capacity evaluation and work hardening perspective. In Mayer T, Mooney V, Gatchel R. eds. Contemporary conservative care for painful spinal disorders. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1991, pp. 328-345.
10. Baltic M, Bigos S, Fisher L, Hansson T, Jones M, Wortley M. Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain reports. Spine 1988; 14: 851-856.
11. Masset D, Malchaire J, Lemoine M. Static and dynamic characteristics of the trunk and history of low back pain. Int J Ind Ergon 1993; 11: 279-290.
12. Klein A, Snyder-Machler L, Roy S, Deluca C. Comparison of spinal mobility and isometric trunk extensor forces with electromyographic spectral analysis in identifying low back pain. Phys Ther 1991; 71: 445-454.
13. Mandell P, Weitz E, Berstein J, et al. Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting measure differences and similarities between low-back-injured and noninjured workers. Spine 1993; 18: 2491-2501.
14. Marras W, Wongsam P. Flexibility and velocity of the normal and impaired lumbar spine. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1986; 67: 213-217.
15. Marras W, Parnianpour M, Ferguson S, Kim J, Crowell R, Simon S. Quantification and classification of low back disorders based on trunk motion. Eur J Phys Med Rehab 1993; 3: 214-235.
16. Marras W, Parnianpour M, Ferguson S, et al. The classification of anatomic and symptom based low back disorders using motion measure models. Spine 1995; 20: 2531-2546.
17. Panjabi M, Yamanoto I, Oxland T, Crisco J. How does posture affect coupling in the lumbar spine? Spine 1982; 7: 192-203.
18. Pearcy M, Tibrewal S. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 1984; 9(6): 582-587.
19. Oxland T, Crisco J, Panjabi M, Yamamoto I. The Effect of injury on rotational coupling at the lumbosacral joint A biomechanical investigation. Spine 1992; 17(1): 75-80.
20. Twomey L, Taylor J. Lumbar posture, movement, and mechanics. In: Twomey and Taylor, eds. Physical therapy of the low back, 2nd Ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994, pp. 57-91.
21. White A, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: L.B. Lippincott Company, 1990.
22. Spitzer W, et al. [Quebec task force on spinal disorders]: Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task for on spinal disorders. Spine 1987; 12: S1-S59.
23. Marras W, Fathallah F, Miller R, Davis S, Mirka G. Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics. Int J Ind Ergon 1992; 9: 75-87.
24. Kachigan & Multivariate statistical analysis a conceptual introduction New York: Radium Press, 1991.
25. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT user's Guide Release 6.03 Gary, NC: SAS Institute, 1988, pp. 372.
26. Chazel J, Tanguy A, Bourges M, et al. Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. J Biomech 1985; 18: 167-176
27. Nordin M, Frankel V. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1989.
28. Panjabi M, Goel V, Takata K. Physiologic strains in the lumbar spinal ligaments: An in vitro biomechanical study. Spine 1982; 7: 192-203.
29. Agur A. Grant's atlas of anatomy (9th Ed). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1991.
30. Porterfield J, DeRosa C. Mechanical low back pain perspectives in functional anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co., 1991.
31. Marras W, Lavender S, Leurgans S, et al. The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders: The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, trunk motion characteristics on injury. Spine 1993; 18: 617-628.