Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: An in vitro study

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 1981-1988

  Tabensky, Aaron D ^a   Williams, John ^a   Deluca, Vanessa ^a   Briganti, Esther ^a   Seeman, Ego ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b AUSTIN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MASS; BONE MINERAL; BONE STRENGTH; CALCULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DENSITOMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PREDICTION; VERTEBRA BODY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BONE DENSITY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINAL FRACTURES;

EID: 0030478215     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kanis JA 1984 Treatment of osteoporotic fracture. Lancet i:27-33.
2. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr 1988 Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804-1809.
3. Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL 1993 Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8:1227-1233.
4. Carter DR, Hayes WC 1977 The compressive behaviour of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:954-962.
5. Mazess RB, Wahner HM 1988 Nuclear medicine and densitometry. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (eds.) Osteoporosis, Aetiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Raven Press, New York, NY, U.S.A., pp. 251-295.
6. Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R 1992 New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137-145.
7. Peel NFA, Eastell R 1994 Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:317-320.
8. Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L 1990 Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. Bone 11:67-73.
9. Israel H 1973 Progressive enlargement of the vertebral body as part of the process of human skeletal ageing. Age Ageing 2:71-79.
10. Yamagata M, Moriya H, Goto S, Takahashi K 1990 Relationship between mechanical strength and bone mineral density of the vertebral shell and core. In: Cohn DV, Glorieux FH, Martin TJ (eds.) Calcium Regulation and Bone Metabolism. Elsevier Science Pub. Co., New York, NY, U.S.A., pp. 502-508.
11. Moro M, Hecker AT, Bouxsein ML, Myers ER 1995 Failure load of thoracic vertebrae correlates with lumbar bone mineral density measured by DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 56:206-209.
12. Myers TJ, Battocletti JH, Mahesh M, Gulati M, Wilson CR, Pintar F, Reinartz J 1994 Comparison of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the measurement of thoracic vertebral bone mineral density: Compressive force versus bone mineral. Osteoporosis Int 4:129-137.
13. Porter RW, Miller CG, Grainger D, Palmer SB 1990 Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. Br Med J 301:638-641.
14. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM 1993 Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72-75.
15. Wasnich RD, Ross PD, Davis JW, Vogel JM 1989 A comparison of single and multiple-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability. J Nucl Med 30:1166-1177.
16. Weinstein RS, New KD, Sappington LJ 1991 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius. Calcif Tissue Int 49:313-316.
17. Strause L, Bracker M, Saltman P, Sartoris D, Kerr E 1989 A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women, Calcif Tissue Int 45:288-291.
18. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld, Neer RM 1988 Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:839-844.
19. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Brown ML, Morin RL, Riggs BL 1988 Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin Proc 63:1075-1083.
20. Moris M, Peretz A, Tjeka R, Negaban N, Wouters M, Bergmann P 1995 Quantitative ultrasound bone measurements: Normal values and comparison with bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 57:6-10.
21. Louis O, Boulpaep F, Willnecker J, Van den Winkel P, Osteaux M 1995 Cortical mineral content of the radius assessed by peripheral QCT predicts compressive strength on biomechanical testing. Bone 16:375-379.
22. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Carey MA, Johnston CC Jr 1995 Choosing between predictors of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:1816-1822.
23. Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Agnusdei D, Palmieri R, Rossi S, Gennari C 1995 Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in post-menopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 5:413-418.
24. Yu W, Glüer C-C, Grampp S, Jergas M, Fuerst T, Wu CY, Lu Y, Fan B, Genant HK 1995 Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: A comparison between dual x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporosis Int 5:433-439.
25. Travers-Gustafson D, Stegman MR, Heaney RP, Recker RR 1995 Ultrasound, densitometry, and extraskeletal appendicular fracture risk factors: A cross-sectional report on the Saunders County Bone Quality Study. Calcif Tissue Int 57:267-271.
26. Guglielmi G, Fisher KC, Susman N, Pacifici R. 1994 Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology 192:845-850.
27. Uebelhart D, Duboeuf F, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD 1990 Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: A new technique to measure bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 5:525-531.
28. Bjarnason K, Nilas L, Hassager C, Christiansen C 1995 Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the spine: Decubitus lateral versus anteroposterior projection in osteoporotic women: Comparison with single energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm. Bone 16:255-260.
29. Mazess RB, Barden H, Mautalen C, Vega E 1994 Normalization of spine densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:541-548.
30. Biggemann M, Hilweg D, Brinckmann P 1988 Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography. Skel Radiol 17:264-269.