Biotechnology in Europe: Contentions in the risk-regulation debate

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 117-122

  Shohet, Simon ^a  

^a LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; INDUSTRIAL REGULATION;

EUROPE;

EID: 0030473963     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/spp/23.2.117     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. S Shackley, "Regulation of the release of genetically manipulated organisms into the environment", Science and Public Policy, 16(4), August 1989, pages 211-233.
2. L Levidow and J Tait, "Release of genetically modified organisms into the environment: precautionary legislation", Project Appraisal, 7(2), June 1992, pages 93-105.
3. J Tait and L Levidow, "Proactive and reactive approaches to risk regulation: the case of biotechnology", Futures, April 1992, pages 219-231.
4. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Thirteenth Report. The Release of Genetically Modified Organisms into the Environment (HMSO, 1989).
5. House of Lords, Seventh Report of the Select Committee on Science and Technology - Regulation of the UK Biotechnology Industry and global competitiveness, HL Paper 80 (HMSO, 1993).
6. See for example J R S Fincham and J Ravetz, "Managing the uncertainties of risk assessment", in Genetically Engineered Organisms - benefits and risks (Open University Press, 1990) pages 129-139.
7. A Munson, "Risk associated with, and liability arising from, releases of genetically modified organisms into the environment", Science and Public Policy, 22(1), February 1995, pages 51-63.
8. See Appendix 4 of reference 5.
9. See, for example reference 5, page 173.
10. See reference 3.
11. See reference 36.
12. See reference 7.
13. See reference 4.
14. See reference 5.
15. See reference 15, page 25.
16. See reference 15, page 28.
17. See reference 5, page 9.
18. See reference 5, page 54.
19. See reference 5, page 55.