How useful is selection?

International Journal of Psycho-Analysis

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1213-1232

  Kappelle, Willem ^a  

^a NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; STAFF TRAINING;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA;

EID: 0030473780     PISSN: 00207578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BEENEN, F. ET AL. (1979). On criteria for analyzability; one step beyond clinical assumptions. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 2: 319-344.
2. _ (1980). Over psychoanalyse-indicatie: empirische herwaardering van klinische overwegingen. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 6: 123-140.
3. BERCHENKO, F. (1981). On the selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. In Clinical Psychoanalysis, Vol. 3, ed. S. Orgel & B. D. Fine. New York and London: Jason Aronson, pp. 319-329.
4. BIRD, B. (1968). On candidate selection and its relation to analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49: 513-527.
5. BLÉCOURT, A. DE (1979). Problems of selection of trainees considered from a psychoanalytic point of view. Psychotherapy, Research and Training. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, pp. 223-226.
6. _ ET AL. (1982). Over psychoanalyse-indicatie: betekenis van bet vermogen om fantasie en realiteit te onderscheiden. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 8: 339-355.
7. _ (1991). Voelen, denken en handelen in de psychoanalyse. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum, p. 94.
8. CALEF, V. (1971). A report of the 4th precongress on training, Vienna 1971. Int. J. Psychoanal., 53: 37-43.
9. CEA (1977). Report of the Study Commission on the Evaluation of Applicants for Psychoanalytic Training. 143rd Bulletin of the IPA. Int. J. Psychoanal., 59: 79-85.
10. CONSOLE, W. (1963). A study of one hundred consecutive applicants. In Voelen, denken en handelen in de psychoanalyse, ed. A. de Blécourt. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum, 1991, p. 98.
11. CREMERIUS, J. (1986). Spurensicherung. Die psychoanalytische Bewegung und das Elend der psychoanalytischen Institution. Psyche, 12: 1063-1091.
12. EISENDORFER, A. (1959). The selection of candidates applying for psychoanalytic training. Psychoanal Q., 28: 374-378.
13. FREUD, A. (1967). In 'The evaluation of applicants for psychoanalytic training'. H. Kohut. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49: 553.
14. GREENACRE, P. (1961). A critical digest of the literature on selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. Psychoanal. Q., 30: 28-55.
15. GREENSON, R. R. (1961). The selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. A panel report. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 9: 135-145.
16. HEIMANN, P. (1968). The evaluation of applicants for psychoanalytic training. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49: 527-539.
17. HOLT, R. & LUBORSKY, L. (1955). The selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training on the use of interviews and psychological tests. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 3: 666-681.
18. IPA (1991). Code of Ethical and Professional Conduct. S/91/23:52.
19. KERNBERG, O. F. ET AL. (1972). Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Final report of the Menninger Foundation's Psychotherapy Research Project. Bulln. Menninger Clinic, 36: 3-275.
20. _ (1984). Changes in the nature of psychoanalytic training, structure of training and standards of training. In Changes in Analysts and their Training, ed. R. W. Wallerstein. IPA Monograph Series No. 4, pp. 56-61.
21. KLEIN, H. R. (1965). Selection techniques. In Psychoanalysts in Training. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, pp. 89-128.
22. _ (1985). In Die Zulassung zur psychoanalytischen Ausbildung, ed. A. Pollmann. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift 'Materialien zur Psychoanalyse und analytisch orientierten Psychotherapie', 9: 255. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
23. KNIGHT, R.P. (1953). The present status of organized psychoanalysis in the United States. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 1: 197-221.
24. KOHUT, H. (1968). The evaluation of applicants for psychoanalytic training. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49: 548-554.
25. LANGER, M. (1961). Selection criteria for the training of psychoanalytic students. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43: 272-216.
26. LEEUW, P. J. VAN DER (1961). Selection criteria for the training of psychoanalytic students. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43: 277-282.
27. NAMNUM, A. (1980). Trends in the selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 28: 419-437.
28. POLLOCK, G. (1961). Historical perspectives in the selection of candidates for psychoanalytic training. Psychoanal. Q., 30: 481-496.
29. _ (1976). Chicago selection research. The selection process and the selector. Ann. Psychoanal., 4: 309-331.
30. POLLMANN, A. (1985). Die Zulassung zur psychoanalytischen Ausbildung, ed. A. Pollmann. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift 'Materialien zur Psychoanalyse und analytisch orientierten Psychotherapie', 9: 205. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
31. SHARPE, E. F. (1947). The psychoanalyst. In Collected Papers on Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth, 1947, 1950, pp. 109-122.
32. WAELDER, R. (1961). Selection criteria for the training of psychoanalytic students. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43: 283-286.
33. WALLERSTEIN, R. S. (1977). Perspectives on psychoanalytic training around the world. Int. J. Psychoanal., 59: 477-503.
34. _ (1992). Psychoanalytic research. IPA Newsletter, Winter 1992:29-31.
35. WINDHOLZ, E. (1972). Evaluation methods of studying psychoanalytic education. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 20: 567-573.