An analysis of arguments for and against euthanasia and assisted suicide: Part one

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 62-76

  Thomasma, David C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ASSISTED SUICIDE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; DEHUMANIZATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; EUTHANASIA; FREEDOM; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGAL ASPECT; LIVING WILL; MENTAL STRESS; PATERNALISM; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; POLICY; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DEHUMANIZATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EUTHANASIA; EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY; FREEDOM; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; PATERNALISM; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL VALUES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SUICIDE, ASSISTED; UNITED STATES; VALUE OF LIFE; WEDGE ARGUMENT;

EID: 0030472875     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180100006733     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Ghosh A. The ghosts of Mrs. Ghandi. The New Yorker 1995;61(20):35-41.
2. Byock IR. The art of dying in America. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 1995;12(2):6-7.
3. Study puts high cost on care for dying. Chicago Tribune 1993;February 10(Sect 1):12.
4. Associated Press/Media General. Poll no. 4. Richmond, Virginia: Media General, February 1985.