Where is the disintegration?

Growth and Change

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 29-46

  Kie, Clayton ^a   Hynes, Martin ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; FLEXIBLE PRODUCTION; SCOTT,A.; THEORETICAL STUDY; VERTICAL DISINTEGRATION;

USA, CALIFORNIA;

EID: 0030472374     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1996.tb00894.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adelman, M. 1955. Concept and statistical measurement of vertical integration. In Business Concentration and Price Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 281-330. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Amin, A. 1989. Flexible specialisation and small firms in Italy: Myths and realities, Antipode, 21:13-34.
3. Amin, A. and K. Robbins. 1990. The re-emergence of regional economies? The mythical geography of flexible accumulation, Environment and Planning D, 8: 7-34.
4. Boyer, R. 1988. Technical change and the theory of regulation. In Technical change and economic theory, edited by G. Dosi., et al., pp. 67-94. New York: Pinter, pp. 67-94.
5. Clark, G. 1984. The changing composition of regional employment, Economic Geography, 60: 175-193.
6. Christopherson, S. 1989. Flexibility in the United States service economy and the emerging spatial division of labour, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 14: 131-143.
7. Cohen, S. and Garcia, C. 1994. California's missile gap, California Management Review, 37:110-131.
8. Eckard, E. 1979. A note on the empirical measurement of vertical integration, Journal of Industrial Economics 28: 105-107.
9. Florida, R. 1994. Review of Technopolis, by A. Scott. Growth and Change 25: 528-532.
10. Gertler, M. 1992. Flexibility revisited: Districts, nation-states, and the forces of production, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 17: 259-278.
11. Knudsen, D., F.R. Jacobs, D. Conway, and M.K. Blake. 1994. A survey of group technology adoption in the American Midwest, Growth and Change 25: 183-205.
12. Levy, D. 1984. Testing Stigler's interpretation of the division of labor is limited by the extent of the market, Journal of Industrial Economics 32: 377-389.
13. Levering, J. 1990. Fordism's unknown successor: A comment on Scott's theory of flexible accumulation and the reemergence of regional economies, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14: 159-174.
14. MacPherson, A. 1994. Industrial innovation among small and medium-sized firms in a declining region, Growth and Change, 25: 145-163.
15. Markusen, A., et al. 1991. The rise of the Gunbelt. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics. 8th Edition. London: Macmillan.
17. Peck, J. 1992. Labor and agglomeration: Control and flexibility in local labor markets, Economic Geography, 68: 325-347.
18. Piore, M. and C. Sabel. 1984. The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.
19. Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
20. Saxenian, A. 1990. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley, California Management Review, 33: 89-112.
21. _. 1991. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley, Research Policy, 20: 423-437.
22. Sayer, A. 1989. Postfordism in question, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13: 666-69.
23. Schoenberger, E. 1988. From Fordism to flexible accumulation: Technology, competitive strategies and international location, Environment and Planning D, 6: 245-262.
24. Scott, A. 1984. Industrial organization and the logic of intra-metropolitan location II: A case study of the women's dress industry in the greater Los Angeles region, Economic Geography, 60: 3-27.
25. _. 1986. High technology industry and territorial development: The rise of the Orange County complex, Urban Geography 7: 3-45.
26. _. 1988a. New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion.
27. _. 1988b. Metropolis: From the division of labour to urban form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. _. 1992. The collective order of flexible production agglomerations: Lessons for local economic development policy and strategic choice, Economic Geography, 68: 219-233.
29. _. 1993. Technopolis: High-technology industry and regional development in Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Scott, A., and M. Storper. 1987. High technology industry and regional development: A theoretical critique and reconstruction, International Social Science Journal, 112: 215-232.
31. Signorini, L.F. 1994. The price of Prato, or measuring the industrial effect, Papers in Regional Science, 73: 369-392.
32. Storper, M. and S. Christopherson. 1987. Flexible specialization and regional industrial agglomerations: The case of the United States motion picture industry, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77: 104-117.
33. Storper, M. and R. Walker. 1989. The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. New York: Basil Blackwell.
34. Tucker and Wilder. 1977. Trends in vertical integration in the U.S. manufacturing sector, Journal of Industrial Economics 26: 81-94.
35. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1963-1987, Census of manufactures. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36. _. 1971. Annual survey of manufactures. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37. U.S. Department of Labor. 1963-1987. Producer price indices. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38. Webber, M. 1991. The contemporary transition, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 9: 165-182.
39. Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: Free Press
40. _. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.