A middle ground on physician-assisted suicide

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 33-43

  Tulsky, James A ^a   Alpers, Ann ^a   Lo, Bernard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE EUTHANASIA; ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; ASSISTED SUICIDE; CRIMINAL LAW; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL STRESS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ADVOCACY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; LEGAL APPROACH;

ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CRIMINAL LAW; EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE; GOALS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HOMICIDE; HUMANS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; SOCIAL VALUES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SUICIDE, ASSISTED; UNITED STATES; WEDGE ARGUMENT;

EID: 0030470568     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180100006708     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Barber v. Superior Court. 195 Cal. Rptr. 484, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1054, 1983.
2. Angell M. Euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine 1988;319:1348-50.
3. Brock DW. Voluntary active euthanasia. Hastings Center Report 1992;22:10-22.
4. Brody H. Assisted death: a compassionate response to a medical failure. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;327:1384-8.