Spatial analysis improves precision of seed lot comparisons

Crop Science

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1180-1184

  Clarke, F R ^a   Baker, R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0030465152     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050019x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bartlett, M.S. 1938. The approximate recovery of information from replicated field experiments with large blocks. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 28:418-427.
2. Brownie. C., D.T. Bowman, and J.W. Burton. 1993. Estimating spatial variation in analysis of data from yield trials: a comparison of methods. Agron. J. 85:1244-1253.
3. Clarke, F.R., R.J. Baker, and R.M. DePauw. 1994. Moving mean and least squares smoothing for analysis of grain yield data. Crop Sci. 34:1479-1483.
4. Cochran, W.G., and G.M. Cox. 1957. Experimental Designs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
5. Cullis, B.R., and A.C. Gleeson. 1991. Spatial analysis of field experiments - an extension to two dimensions. Biometrics 47:1449-1460.
6. Gleeson, A.C., and B.R. Cullis. 1987. Residual maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of a neighbour model for field experiments. Biometrics 43:277-288.
7. Gollob, H.F. 1968. A statistical model which combines features of factor analysis and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33:73-116.
8. Green, P.J., C. Jennison and A.H. Seheult. 1985. Analysis of field experiments by least squares smoothing. J. R. Statis. Soc. B. 47: 299-315.
9. Lefkovitch, L.P. 1992. Fertility adjustments in rectangular field trials. Biom. J. 34:3-15.
10. Morrison, D.F. 1983. Applied linear statistical methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.
11. Papadakis, J.S. 1937. Méthode statistique pour des expériences sur champ. Bulletin de Institut d'Amélioration des Plantes à Salonique. Thessalonique 23.
12. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
13. SAS Institute. 1992. SAS technical report P-229, SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements, Release 6.07, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
14. Sonntag, C.W., B.G. Rossnagel, and R.J. Baker. 1993. Seed characteristics related to stand density and yield from different barley and wheat seed lots. Plant Varieties Seeds 6:207-213.
15. Stroup, W.W., P.S. Baenziger, and D.K. Mulitze. 1994. Removing spatial variation from wheat yield trials: a comparison of methods. Crop Sci. 34:62-66.
16. Stroup, W. W., and D.K. Mulitze. 1991. Nearest neighbor adjusted best linear unbiased prediction. Am. Stat. 45:194-200.
17. Wilkinson, G.N., S.R. Ecken, T.W. Hancock, and O. Mayo. 1983. Nearest neighbour (NN) analysis of field experiments. J. R. Statis. Soc. B. 45:151-200.
18. Williams, R.M. 1952. Experimental designs for serially correlated observations. Biometrika 39:152-167.