Patient dose measurements from femoral angiography

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 69, Issue 828, 1996, Pages 1159-1164

  Hoskins, P R ^a   Gillespie, I ^a   Ireland, H M ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ARTICLE; FEMORAL ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LEG; PELVIS; PHANTOM; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TIME; TRUNK;

EID: 0030464316     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-828-1159     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. STEELE, H R and TEMPERTON, D H, Technical note: Patient doses received during digital subtraction angiography, Br. J. Radiol., 66, 452-456 (1993).
2. MARSHALL, N W, NOBLE, J and FAULKNER, K, Patient and staff dosimetry in neuroradiological procedures, Br. J. Radiol., 68, 495-501 (1995).
3. VAÑÓ, E, GONZALEZ, L, FERNANDEZ, J M ET AL, Patient dose values in interventional radiology, Br. J. Radiol., 68, 1215-1220 (1995).
4. FAULKNER, K, LOVE, H G, SWEENEY, J K ET AL, Radiation doses and somatic risk to patients during cardiac radiological procedures, Br. J. Radiol., 59, 359-363 (1986).
5. LEUNG, K C and MARTIN, C J, Effective doses for coronary angiography, Br. J. Radiol., 69, 426-431 (1996).
6. THWAITES, J H, RAFFERTY, M W, GRAY, N ET AL, A patient dose survey for femoral arteriogram diagnostic radiographic examinations using a dose area product meter, Phys. Med. Biol, 41, 899-907 (1996).
7. CASTELLANO, I A, McNEIL, J G, THORP, N C ET AL, Assessment of organ radiation doses and associated risk for digital bifemoral angiography, Br. J. Radiol., 68, 502-507 (1995).
8. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 1977 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 26 (Pergammon Press. Oxford), Ann. ICRP, Vol. 1, No. 3 (1977).
9. ICRP, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 60 (Pergammon Press, Oxford), Ann. ICRP, Vol. 21, No. 1-3 (1990).
10. SHRIMPTON, P C, WALL, B F, JONES, D G ET AL, A National Survey of Doses to Patients Undergoing a Selection of Routine X-ray Examinations in English Hospitals (NRPB-R200) (HMSO, London) (1986).
11. HART, D, JONES, D G and WALL, B F, Estimation of Effective Dose in Diagnostic Radiology From Entrance Surface Dose and Dose-area Product Measurements (NRPB-R262) (HMSO, London) (1994).
12. HART, D, JONES, D G and WALL, B F, Normalised Organ Doses for Medical X-ray Examinations Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques (NRPB-SR262) (NRPB, Didcot) (1994).
13. HOSKINS, P R and ADAM, R D, An evaluation of a Diamentor based system for estimation of spot film dose-area product values, Br. J. Radiol., 68, 1106-1111 (1995).
14. NATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION BOARD, National Protocol For Patient Dose Measurements in Diagnostic Radiology (NRPB, Didcot) (1992).
15. MARTIN, C J and HUNTER, S, Reduction of patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations through changes in equipment factors, Br. J. Radiol., 67, 1196-1205 (1994).
16. MARTIN, C J and HUNTER, S, Analysis of patient doses for myelogram and discogram examinations and their reduction through changes in equipment set-up, Br. J. Radiol., 68, 508-514 (1995).
17. TOSI, G, TORRESIN, A, RAIMONDI, G ET AL, Contrast media in neuroangiographical examinations: optimisation of X-ray beam quality and screen-film combination. In Optimisation of Image Quality and Patient Exposure in Diagnostic Radiology, ed. by B M Moores, B F Wall, H Eriksat ET AL (British Institute of Radiology, London), pp. 150-152 (1989).