The need for state-dependent foraging models to predict size-selectivity of 0+ zooplanktivorous fish

Limnologica

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 139-143

  Wanzenbock J ^a  

^a ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Foraging behaviour; Prey handling; Rutilus rutilus; Size selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; RUTILUS RUTILUS; CLADOCERA;

FORAGING MODEL; PLANKTIVOROUS FISH;

EID: 0030461256     PISSN: 00759511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BINDOO, M. & ARAVINDAN, C. M. (1992): Influence of size and level of satiation on prey handling time in Channa striata (Bloch). J. Fish. Biol. 40: 497-502.
2. CARPENTER, S. R. & KITCHELL, J. F. (1993): The trophic cascade in lakes. Cambridge.
3. CONFER, J. L. & O'BRYAN, L. M. (1989): Changes in prey rank and preference by young planktivores for short-term and long-term ingestion periods. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 1026-1032.
4. - MILLS, E. L. & O'BRYAN, L. (1990): Influence of prey abundance on species and size selection by young yellow perch (Perca flavescens). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 882-887.
5. CROY, M. I. & HUGHES, R. N. (1990): The combined effects of learning and hunger in the feeding behaviour of the fifteen-spined stickleback Spinachia spinachia L. In: R. N. HUGHES (ed.): Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. Berlin.
6. CRYER, M., PEIRSON, G. & TOWNSEND, C. R. (1986): Reciprocal interactions between roach, Rutilus rutilus, and zooplankton in a small lake: Prey dynamics and fish growth and recruitment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 1022-1038.
7. ELLIOTT, J. M. & PERSSON, L. (1978): The estimation of daily rates of food consumption for fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 977-991.
8. HART, P. J. B. & GILL, A. B. (1993): Choosing prey size: a comparison of static and dynamic foraging models for predicting prey choice by fish. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 23: 91-104.
9. HARTMANN, J. (1986): Interspecific predictors of selected prey of young fishes. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 22: 373-386.
10. HIRVONEN, H. & RANTA, E. (1996): Within-bout dynamics of diet choice and variable handling time. Behav. Ecol. (in press).
11. KAISER, M. J. & HUGHES, R. N. (1993): Factors affecting the behavioural mechanisms of diet selection in fishes. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 23: 105-118.
12. - WESTHEAD, A. P., HUGHES, R. N. & GIBSON, R. N. (1992): Are digestive characteristics important contributors to the profitability of prey? A study of diet selection in the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Oecologia 90: 61-69.
13. KECKEIS, H. & SCHIEMER, F. (1992): Food consumption and growth of larvae and juveniles of three cyprinid species at different food levels. Env. Biol. Fish. 33: 33-45.
14. KERFOOT, W. C. & SIH, A. (1987): Predation - Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Hanover and London.
15. KISLALIOGLU, M. & GIBSON, R. N. (1976): Prey "handling time" and its importance in food selection by the 15-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia (L.): J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 25: 115-158.
16. LAZZARO, X. (1987). A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts. Hydrobiologia 146: 97-167.
17. MANGEL, M. & CLARK, C. W. (1986): Towards a unified foraging theory. Ecology 67: 1127-1138.
18. - (1988): Dynamic modelling in behavioural ecology. Princeton.
19. MCNAMARA, J. M. & HOUSTON, A. I. (1986): The common currency for behavioural decisions. Am. Nat. 127: 358-378.
20. MILLS, E. L. & FORNEY, J. L. (1988). Trophic dynamics and development of freshwater pelagic food webs. In: S. R. CARPENTER (ed.) Complex interactions in lake communities, pp. 11-31. New York.
21. - CONFER, J. L. & READY, R. C. (1984): Prey selection by young yellow perch: The influence of capture success, visual acuity, and prey choice. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 113: 579-587.
22. - - & KRETCHMER, D. W. (1986): Zooplankton selection by young perch: the influence of light, prey density, and predator size. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 115: 716-725.
23. NORTHCOTE, T. G. (1988): Fish in the structure and function of fresh water ecosystems: a "topdown" view. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 361-379.
24. PONTON, D. & MÜLLER. R. (1990). Size of prey ingested by whitefish, Coregonus sp., larvae: Are coregonus larvae gape-limited predators? J. Fish. Biol. 36: 67-72.
25. SCHAEL, D. M., RUDSTAM, L. G. & POST, J. R. (1991): Gape limitation and prey selection in larval yellow perch (Perca flavescens), freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens), and black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 1919-1925.
26. WAHL, C. M., MILLS, E. L., MCFARLAND, W. N. & DE GISI, J. S. (1993): Ontogenetic changes in prey selection and visual acuity of the yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 743-749.
27. WANZENBÖCK, J. (1992): Ontogeny of prey attack behaviour in larvae and juveniles of three European cyprinids. Env. Biol. Fish. 33: 23-32.
28. - (1995): Changing handling times during feeding and consequences for prey size selection of 0+ zooplanktivorous fish. 104: 372-378.
29. WHITESIDE, M. C. (1988): 0+ fish as a major factor affecting abundance patterns of littoral zooplankton. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 23: 1710-1714.
30. ZALEWSKI, M., BREWINSKA-ZARAS, B., FRANKIEWICZ, P. & KALINOWSKI, S. (1990): The potential for biomanipulation using fry communities in a lowland reservoir: concordance between water quality and optimal recruitment. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 549-556.