Impact fees: A review of alternatives and their implications for planning practice in Britain

Town Planning Review

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 161-181

  Goodchild, Barry ^a   Booth, Christine ^a   Henneberry, John ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; IMPACT FEE; INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON; PLANNING PRACTICE; TOWN PLANNING;

UK;

EID: 0030460964     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.67.2.543802528k85q7k5     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. BAILEY, S. J. (1990), 'Charges for local infrastructure', Town Planning Review, 61, 427-53.
2. BAILEY, S. J. (1994), 'User-charges for urban services', Urban Studies, 31, 745-65.
3. BISHOP, K. (1991), 'Planning for environmental gains' (papers in Planning Research 121), Cardiff, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales College of Cardiff.
4. BOWERS, J. (1991), 'The economics of planning gain: a reappraisal' (Discussion Paper Series), Leeds, School of Business and Economic Studies, University of Leeds.
5. BURTON, T., REYNOLDS, F. and SINDEN, N. (1991), 'Planning gain: a strategy for conservation' (Working Paper 4), Bristol, Department of Geography, University of Bristol.
6. BYRNE, S. (1989), Planning Gain: An Overview, London, The Royal Town Planning Institute.
7. CALLIES, D. L. and GRANT, M. (1991), 'Paying for growth and planning gain: an Anglo-American comparison of development conditions, impact fees and development agreements', The Urban Lawyer, 23, 221-48.
8. THE COUNTY SURVEYORS' SOCIETY (1994), 'Developer contributions to transport infrastructure' (unpublished).
9. DELAFONS, J. (1990), 'Development impact fees and other devices' (Monograph 40), Berkeley, University of California.
10. DELAFONS, J. (1991), 'Planning in the USA - paying for development', The Planner, June, 8-9.
11. DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (1992), Development Plans and Regional Planning Guidance (Planning Policy Guidance Note No. 12), London, HMSO.
12. DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT/WELSH OFFICE (1991), Planning and Compensation Act 1991, Planning Obligations (DOE Circular 16/91) (Welsh Office 53/91), London, Department of the Environment.
13. GOODCHILD, B. and HENNEBERRY, J. (1994), Impact Fees for Planning, London, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
14. GRANT, M. (1991-94), Encyclopedia of Planning Law and Practice, Volume 2: Town and Country Planning Act, 1990, London, Sweet and Maxwell.
15. GRIMLEY J. R. EVE (1992), The Use of Planning Agreements, London, DOE, HMSO.
16. HEALEY, P. (1992), 'Review of a "Practitioner's Guide to Development Impact Fees" by Nicholas et al.' (1991), Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 35, 105-08.
17. HEALEY, P., ENNIS, F. and PURDUE, M. (1992), 'Planning gain and the "new" local plans', Town and Country Planning, February, 39-43.
18. HEALEY, P., PURDUE, M. and ENNIS, F. (1993a), Gains from Planning? Dealing with Impacts of Development, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
19. HEALEY, P., PURDUE, M. and ENNIS, F. (1993b), 'Development impacts and obligations', The Planner, July, 11-14.
20. KIRKWOOD, G. and EDWARDS, M. (1993), 'Affordable housing policy - desirable but unlawful', Journal of Planning and Environmental Law, April, 317-24.
21. LICHFIELD, N. (1992), 'From planning obligations to community impact', Journal of Planning and Enviroment Law, December, 1103-18.
22. NICHOLAS, J. C. (1992), 'On the progression of impact fees', American Planning Association Journal, 58, 517-24.
23. NICHOLAS, J. C. and NELSON, A. C. (1988), 'Determining the appropriate development impact fee using the rational nexus test', American Planning Association Journal, 54, 56-66.
24. NICHOLAS, J. C., NELSON, A. C. and JUERGENSMEYER, J. C. (1991), A Practitioner's Guide to Development Impact Fees, Chicago, Planners Press, American Planning Association.
25. OFWAT (1993), Setting Price Limits for Water and Sewerage Services: The Framework and Approach to the 1994 Periodic Review, Birmingham, The Office of Water Services.
26. PURDUE, M., HEALEY, P. and ENNIS F. (1992), 'Planning gain and grant of planning permission: is the United States' test of the "rational nexus" the appropriate solution?', Journal of Planning and Environmental Law, November, 1012-24.
27. RENARD, V. (1987), 'Financing public facilities in France', in R. Alterman (ed.), Private Supply of Public Services, New York, New York University Press.
28. RENARD, V. (1993), personal communication with the authors, February.
29. ROWAN-ROBINSON, J. and LLOYD, M. G. (1988), Land Development and the Infrastructure Lottery, Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark.
30. WAKEFORD, R. (1990), American Development Control, Parallels and Paradoxes from an English Perspective, London, HMSO.