Comparative maps: Adding pieces to the mammalian jigsaw puzzle

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 723-730

  Eppig, Janan T ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA BASE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC LINKAGE; HUMAN; MAMMAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; X CHROMOSOME;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 0030460490     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80027-X     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. 1. Haldane JBS: The comparative genetics of colour in rodents and carnivora. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 1927, 2:199-212.
2. 2. Jacob HJ, Brown DM, Bunker RK, Daly MJ, Dzau VJ, Goodman A, Koike G, Dren V, Durtz T, Lernmark A et al.: A genetic linkage map of the laboratory rat, Rattus norvegicus. Nat Genet 1995, 9:63-69. A rat map including 432 SSLP markers mapped in a (SHR×GN) F2 cross has been developed as the first step in the development of a comprehensive map of the rat genome.
3. 3. Hino O, Testa JR, Buetow KH, Taguchi T, Zhou J-Y, Bremer M, Bruzel A, Yeung R, Levan G, Levan KK et al.: Universal mapping probes and the origin of human chromosome 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:730-734.
4. 4. O'Brien SJ, Graves JAM: Report of the committee on comparative gene mapping; human gene mapping 11. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1991, 58:1124-1151.
5. 5. First International Workshop on Comparative Genome Organization: Comparative genome organization of vertebrates. Mamm Genome 1996, 7:717-734. A report of the First International Workshop on Comparative Genome Organization which brought together representative researchers who are developing genetic maps of many species. The important components of this report include agreement and delineation of criteria for homology, discussions of the applications of comparative mapping to aid cross-species map development and disease models, and updates on the status of comparative maps of many species. This workshop report also provides a table of WWW addresses for comparative mapping databases and species-specific databases.
6. 6. Nelson DR, Koymans L, Kamataki T, Stegeman JJ, Feyereisen R, Waxman DJ, Waterman MR, Gotoh O, Coon MJ, Estabrook RW et al.: P450 superfamily: update on new sequences, gene mapping, accession numbers and nomenclature. Pharmacogenetics 1996, 6:1-42.
7. 7. Goodwin RL, Baumann H, Berger FG: Patterns of divergence during evolution of α1-proteinase inhibitors in mammals. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:346-358.
8. 8. Lawn RM, Boonmark NW, Schwartz K, Lindahl GE, Wade DP, Byrne CD, Fong KJ, Meer K, Patthy L: The recurring evolution of lipoprotein (a). Insights from cloning of hedgehog apolipoprotein (a). J Biol Chem 1995, 270:24004-24009.
9. 9. The Jackson Laboratory; Mouse Genome Database (MGD) on World Wide Web URL: http://www.informatics.jax.org/homology.html The Mouse Genome Database provides comprehensive information about the mouse genome including data on genetic markers, mammalian gene homologies, genetic and physical mapping, molecular reagents, genetic polymorphisms, gene descriptions, and inbred strains. Data are updated daily and available freely via the WWW.
10. 10. Eppig JT, Nadeau JH: Comparative maps: the mammalian jigsaw puzzle. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1995, 5:709-716.
11. 11. Yamada J, Kuramoto T, Serikawa T: A rat genetic linkage map and comparative maps for mouse or human homologous rat genes. Mamm Genome 1994, 5:63-83.
12. 12. Ellegren H, Chowdhary BP, Johansson M, Marklund L, Fredholm M, Gustavsson I, Andersson L: A primary linkage map of the porcine genome reveals a low rate of genetic recombination. Genetics 1994, 137:1089-1100.
13. 13. Archibald AL, Haley CS, Brown JF, Couperwhite S, McQueen HA, Nicholson D, Coppieters W, Van de Weghe A, Stratil A, Wintero AK et al.: The PiGMaP consortium linkage map of the pig (Sus scrofa). Mamm Genome 1995, 6:157-175. Updated map and review of status of knowledge of the pig genome. This report provides a comprehensive look at the pig genome, with 239 genetic markers reported and linkage groups assigned to all autosomes and the X chromosome.
14. 14. Crawford AM, Montgomery GW, Pierson CA, Brown T, Dodds KG, Sunden SLF, Henry HM, Ede AJ, Swarbrick PA, Berryman T et al.: Sheep linkage mapping: nineteen linkage groups derived from the analysis of paternal half-sib families. Genetics 1995, 137:573-579. The authors report a half-sib sheep family in which 52 markers distributed on 19 linkage groups are identified; the first significant large-scale family study for sheep.
15. 15. Echard G, Broad TE, Hill D, Pearce P: Present status of the ovine gene map (Ovis aries): comparison with the bovine map (Bos taurus). Mamm Genome 1994, 5:324-332.
16. 16. Vaiman D, Mercier D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Eggen A, Ciampolini R, Lepingle A, Velmala R, Kaukinen J, Varvio SL, Martin P et al.: A set of 99 cattle microsatellites: characterization, synteny mapping, and polymorphism. Mamm Genome 1994, 5:288-297.
17. 17. Barendse W, Armitage SM, Kossarek LM, Shalom A, Kirkpatrick BW, Ryan AM, Clayton D, Li L, Neiberts HL, Zhang N et al.: A genetic linkage map of the bovine genome. Nat Genet 1994, 6:227-235.
18. 18. Eggen A, Fries R: An integrated cytogenetic and meiotic map of the bovine genome. Anim Genet 1995, 26:215-236. Updated map and review of status of knowledge of the cattle genome. This report includes microsatellite and gene markers with a discussion of the cattle map.
19. 19. O'Brien SJ, Womack JE, Lyons LA, Moore KJ, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: Anchored reference loci for comparative genome mapping in mammals. Nat Genet 1993, 3:103-112.
20. 20. Amadou C, Ribouchon MT, Mattei MG, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Avoustin P, Pontarotti P: Localization of new genes and markers to the distal part of the human major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region and comparison with the mouse: new insights into the evolution of mammalian genomes. Genomics 1995, 26:9-20. Human and mouse maps in the region of the major histocompatibility genes are extended and the genome organization of the two species is compared. The evolutionary breakpoint in human is physically mapped and the surrounding region cloned into yeast artificial chromosomes.
21. 21. Ashworth LK, Batzer MA, Brandriff B, Branscomb E, De Jong P, Garcia E, Games JA, Gordon LA, Lamerdin JE, Lennon G et al.: An integrated metric physical map of human chromosome 19. Nat Genet 1995, 11:422-427. A detailed report on the genetic and physical map of human Chromosome 19. This is a comprehensive look at the organization and content of human Chromosome 19 at the physical mapping level; it is the first of its kind to be presented in such detail.
22. 22. Stubbs L, Carver EA, Shannon ME, Kim J, Geisler J, Generoso EE, Stanford BG, Dunn WC, Mohrenweiser H, Zimmermann W et al.: Detailed comparative map of human chromosome 19q and related regions of the mouse genome. Genomics 1996, 35:499-508. A careful comparison of human Chromosome 19 and mouse Chromosome 7 and delineation of the comparative mapping between the two species' chromosomes. Includes an analysis of very small, previously undiscovered, evolutionary chromosomal rearrangements that differentiate the human and mouse chromosomes.
23. 23. Searle AG, Edwards JH, Hall JG: Mouse homologies of human hereditary disease. J Med Genet 1984, 313:1-19.
24. 24. Searle AG: Table of genetic homology. Mouse Genome 1995, 93:102-144.
25. 25. Gibson F, Walsh J, Mburu P, Varela A, Brown KA, Antonio M, Beisel KW, Steel KP, Brown SD: A type VII myosin encoded by the mouse deafness gene shaker-1. Nature 1995, 374:62-64.
26. 26. Weil D, Blanchard S, Kaplan J, Guilford P, Gibson F, Walsh J, Mburu P, Varela A, Levilliers J, Weston MD et al.: Defective myosin VIIA gene responsible for Usher syndrome type 1B. Nature 1995, 374:60-61.
27. 27. Tachibana M, Perez-Jurado LA, Nakayama A, Hodgkinson CA, Li X, Schneider M, Miki T, Fex J, Francke U, Arnheiter H: Cloning of MITF, the human homolog of the mouse microphthalmia gene and assignment to chromosome 3p14.1-p12.3. Hum Mol Genet 1994, 3:553-557.
28. 28. Tassabehji M, Newton VE, Read AP: Waardenburg syndrome type 2 caused by mutations in the human microphthalmia (MITF) gene. Nat Genet 1994, 8:251-255.
29. 29. Tachibana M, Takeda K, Nobukuni Y, Urabe K, Long JE, Meyers KA, Aaronson SA, Miki T: Ectopic expression of MITF, a gene for Waardenburg syndrome type 2, converts fibroblasts to cells with melanocyte characteristics. Nat Genet 1996, 14:50-54.
30. 30. Hosoda K, Hammer RE, Richardson JA, Baynash AG, Cheung JC, Giaid A, Yanagisawa M: Targeted and natural (piebald-lethal) mutations of endothelin-B receptor gene produce megacolon associated with spotted coat color in mice. Cell 1994, 79:1267-1276.
31. 31. Puffenberger EG, Hosoda K, Washington SS, Nakao K, De Wit D, Yanagisawa M, Chakravarti A: A missense mutation of the endothelin-B receptor gene in multigenic Hirschsprung's disease. Cell 1994, 79:1257-1266.
32. 32. Sakai N, Inui K, Tatsumi N, Fukushima H, Nishigaki T, Taniike M, Nishimoto J, Tsukamoto H, Yanagihara I, Ozone K, Okada S: Molecular cloning and expression of cDNA for murine galactocerebrosidase and mutation analysis of the twitcher mouse, a model of Krabbe's disease. J Neurochem 1996, 66:1118-1124.
33. 33. Luzi P, Rafi MA, Wenger DA: Structure and organization of the human galactocerebrosidase (GALC) gene. Genomics 1995, 26:407-409.
34. 34. Rafi MA, Luzi P, Chen YQ, Wenger DA: A large deletion together with a point mutation in the GALC gene is a common mutant allele in patients with infantile Krabbe disease. Hum Mol Genet 1995, 4:1285-1289.
35. 35. Sakai N, Inui K, Fujii N, Fukushima H, Nishimoto J, Yanagihara I, Isegawa Y, Iwamatsu A, Okada S: Krabbe disease: isolation and characterization of a full-length cDNA for human galactocerebrosidase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994, 198:485-491.
36. 36. Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier H-U, Lima-de-Faria A, Fronicke L: Comparative chromosome painting discloses homolgous segments in distantly related mammals. Nat Genet 1994, 6:342-347.
37. 37. Ried T, Arnold N, Ward DC, Wienberg J: Comparative high-resolution mapping of human and primate chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics 1993, 18:381-386.
38. 38. Rettenberger G, Klett C, Zechner U, Kunz J, Vogel W, Hameister H: Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting. Genomics 1995, 26:372-378.
39. 39. Solinas-Toldo S, Lengauer C, Fries R: Comparative genome map of human and cattle. Genomics 1995, 27:489-496.
40. 40. Chowdhary BP, Fronicke L, Gustavsson I, Scherthan H: Comparative analysis of the cattle and human genomes: detection of ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm Genome 1996, 7:297-302. ZOO-FISH analysis coupled with gene-based comparative mapping shows that this method detects -95% of known conserved segments.
41. 41. Fronicke L, Chowdhary BP, Scherthan H, Gustavsson I: A Comparative map of the porcine and human genomes demonstrates ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm Genome 1996, 7:285-290. In a similar analysis to that in [40••], pig and human genomes are compared using ZOO-FISH methods and found to effectively reflect existing comparative mapping data that is based on gene maps.
42. 42. Ponce de Leon FA, Ambady S, Hawkins GA, Kappes SM, Bishop ME, Robl JM, Beattie CW: Development of a bovine X chromosome linkage group and painting probes to assess cattle, sheep, and goat X chromosome segment homologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:3450-3454.
43. 43. Ohno S: Sex Chromosomes and Sex Linked Genes. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1967.
44. 44. Gough NM, Geearing DP, Nicola NA, Baker E, Pritchard M, Callen DF, Sutherland GR: Localisation of the human GM-CSF receptor gene to the X-Y pseudoautosomal region. Nature 1990, 345:734-736.
45. 45. Milatovitch A, Kitamura T, Miyajima A, Francke U: Gene for the alpha-subunit of the human interleukin-3 receptor (IL3RA) localized to the X-Y pseudoautosomal region. Am J Hum Genet 1993, 53:1146-1153.
46. 46. Disteche CM, Brannan CI, Larsen A, Adler DA, Schorderet DF, Gearing D, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Park LS: The human pseudoautosomal GM-CSF receptor alpha subunit gene is autosomal in mouse. Nat Genet 1992; 1:333-336.
47. 47. Miyajima I, Levitt L, Hara T, Bedell MA, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Miyajima A: The murine interleukin-3 receptor α subunit gene: chromosomal localization, genomic structure, and promoter function. Blood 1995, 85:1246-1253.
48. 48. Palmer S, Perry J, Ashworth A: A contravention of Ohnos law in mice. Nat Genet 1995, 10:472-476. The authors of this paper discuss the known evidence in mouse that contradicts the complete conserved synteny of genes on the X chromosome in mammals and suggests hypotheses to explain these exceptions. The role of chromosome X movement and its implications for evolution are described.
49. 49. Rugarli EI, Adler DA, Borsani G, Tsuchiya K, Franco B, Hauge X, Disteche C, Chapman V, Ballabio A: Different chromosomal localization of the Clcn4 gene in Mus spretus and C57BL/6J mice. Nat Genet 1995, 10:466-471.
50. 50. Toder R, Rappold GA, Schiebel K, Schempp W: ANT3 and STS are autosomal in prosimian lemurs: implications for the evolution of the pseudoautosomal region. Hum Genet 1995, 95:22-28. Studies on ANT3 and STS genes result in the authors hypothesizing that there have been recent genetic additions to the mammalian sex chromosomes.
51. 51. Ellison JW, Li X, Francke U, Shapiro LJ: Rapid evolution of human pseudoautosomal genes and their mouse homologs. Mamm Genome 1996, 7:25-30. These authors hypothesize that the evolutionary reduction of the mammalian pseudoautosomal region occurs by translocation of genes from this region to autosomes.
52. 52. DeBry RW, Seldin MF: Human/mouse homology relationships. Genomics 1996, 33:337-351.