Efficient income redistribution for a small country using optimal combined instruments

Agricultural Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 191-199

  Salhofer, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MARKET; INCOME REDISTRIBUTION; METHODOLOGICAL EVALUATION; POLICY INSTRUMENT; SURPLUS TRANSFORMATION CURVE;

EID: 0030458897     PISSN: 01695150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0169-5150(95)01162-5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. J.M. Alston B.H. Hurd Some neglected social costs of government spending in farm programs Am. J. Agric. Econ. 72 1990 149 156
2. J.M. Alston C.A. Carter V.H. Smith Rationalizing Agricultural Export Subsidies Am. J. Agric. Econ. 75 1993 1000 1009
3. C.L. Ballard Marginal Welfare cost calculations: differential analysis vs. balanced-budget analysis J. Public Econ. 41 1990 263 276
4. C.L. Ballard D. Fullerton Distortionary taxes and the provision of public goods J. Econ. Perspectives 6 1992 117 131
5. A. Brooke D. Kendrick A. Meeraus GAMS: A User's Guide 1988 The Scientific Press San Francisco, CA
6. D.S. Bullock Redistributing income back to European Community consumers and taxpayers through the common Agricultural Policy Am. J. Agric. Econ. 74 1992 59 67
7. D.S. Bullock In search of rational government: what political preference function studies measure and assume Am. J. Agric. Econ. 76 1994 347 361
8. D.S. Bullock Are government transfers efficient? An alternative test of the efficient redistribution hypothesis J. Political Econ. 103 1995 1236 1274
9. D.S. Bullock Pareto optimal income redistribution and political preference functions: An application to EC Common Agricultural Policy J. Antle D. Sumner D. Gale Johnson on Agriculture, Vol. 2: Essays on Agricultural Policy in Honor of D. Gale Johnson 1996 University of Chicago Press Chicago in press
10. D.S. Bullock K.S. Jeong Comment: a critical assessment to the political preference function approach in agricultural economics Agric. Econ. 10 1994 201 206
11. D.S. Bullock K. Salhofer Is a production quota pareto superior to price support only?: Comment 1995 Unpublished manuscript
12. D.S. Bullock K. Salhofer Measuring social costs of inefficient combination of policy instruments: the case of the U.S. agricultural policy Discuss. Pap. No. 37 1995 Department of Economics, Politics, and Law, University of Resource Sciences Vienna
13. A. Burrell The efficiency of alternative policies for the EC's Common Agricultural Policy: Comment Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73 1991 533 534
14. R.G. Chambers The incidence of agricultural policies Working Pap. No. 91-26 1993 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland Revised September 1993
15. H. De Gorter K.D. Meilke Efficiency of alternative policies for the EC's Common Agricultural Policy Am. J. Agric. Econ. 71 1989 592 603
16. G. Fischer K. Frohberg M.A. Keyzer K.S. Parikh Linked National Models: A Tool for International Food Policy Analysis 1988 Kluwer Amsterdam
17. D. Fullerton Reconciling recent estimates of the marginal welfare cost of taxation Am. Econ. Rev. 81 1991 302 308
18. B.L. Gardner Efficient redistribution through commodity markets Am. J. Agric. Econ. 65 1983 225 234
19. B.L. Gardner Export subsidies are still irrational Agric. Econ. Res. 37 1 1985 17 19
20. B.L. Gardner Redistribution of income through commodity and resource policies R.E. Just N. Bockstael Commodity and Resource Policies in Agricultural Systems 1991 Springer Berlin
21. J.de V. Graaff Theoretical Welfare Economics 1957 Cambridge University Press London
22. R.P. Hagemann B.R. Jones B.R. Montador Tax Reform in OECD Countries: Motives, Constraints and Practice OECD Economic Studies No. 10 1988 185 219
23. M.F. Hofreither Wohlfahrtsökonomische Implikationen der Agrarpolitik: Das Konzept der Transfereffizienz Discuss. Pap. No. 11 1992 Department of Economics, Politics, and Law, University of Resource Sciences Vienna
24. R. Kjeldahl Direct payments: how to classify and evaluate the schemes B. Lehmann H.W. Popp E. Stucki Proc. of the 30th EAAE-Seminar Hartung-Gorre, Konstanz Direct Payments in Agricultural and Regional Policies 1993 4 10
25. J. Kola Efficiency of supply control programmes in income redistribution Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 20 1993 183 198
26. L. Maier The relative transfer efficiency of six agricultural support policies for a small exporting country Discuss. Pap. No. 18 1993 Department of Economics, Politics, and Law, University of Resource Sciences Vienna
27. L. Maier The Costs and Benefits of U.S. Agricultural Policies with Imperfect Competition in Food Manufacturing 1993 Garland Publishing New York
28. K.J. Munk Price support to the EC agricultural sector: an optimal policy? Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 5 1989 76 89
29. M.G. Neunteufel K.M. Ortner Auswirkungen eines EG-Beitrittes auf die österreichische Landwirtschaft, Schriftenreihe 1989 Federal Institute of Agricultural Economics Vienna
30. OECD Reforming agricultural policies: quantitative restrictions on production Direct Income Support 1990 OECD Paris
31. OECD Economic surveys: Austria 1992 OECD Paris
32. OECD Assessing the relative transfer efficiency of agricultural support policies 1994 OECD Paris
33. K. Salhofer Eine Wohlfahrtsökonomische Analyse des österreichischen Roggenmarktes—Das Konzept der Transfereffizienz Agrarwirtschaft 42 1993 260 266
34. K. Salhofer Efficient income redistribution and agricultural policy: the case of Austrian bread grains market Res. Rep. 1994 Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Ökonomische Analysen Wirtschaftspolitischer Aktivitäten Vienna
35. P.A. Samuelson Evaluation of real national income Oxford Econ. Pap. 2 1950 1 29
36. M. Schneider M. Wüger Nachfrage nach Nahrungsmitteln und Getränken Monatsberichte 61 1988 Austrian Institute of Economic Research Vienna 455 469
37. W.N. Thurman M.K. Wohlgenannt Consistent estimation of general equilibrium welfare effects Am. J. Agric. Econ. 71 1989 1041 1045
38. S. Von Cramon-Taubadel A critical assessment of the political preference function approach in agricultural economics Agric. Econ. 7 1992 371 394