Conjoint analysis of angler evaluations of Atlantic salmon restoration on the Penobscot River, Maine

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 861-871

  Teisl, Mario F ^a   Boyle, Kevin J ^b   Roe, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SALMO SALAR;

EID: 0030455767     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016<0861:CAOAEO>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Baumgartner, R. M., and T A. Heberlein. 1984. Recent research on mailed questionnaire response rates. Pages 65-76 in D. C. Lockhart, editor. Making effective use of mailed questionnaires. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
2. Boyle, K. J., M. F. Teisl, and S. D. Reiling. 1992a. Qualitative and economic evaluations of Atlantic salmon fishing on the Penobscot River. University of Maine, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Staff Paper 436, Orono.
3. Boyle, K. J., M. F. Teisl, and S. D. Reiling. 1992b. Benefit-cost analyses of Atlantic salmon fishing on the Penobscot River. University of Maine, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Staff Paper 439, Orono.
4. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley, New York.
5. Can, C., and E. S. Luzar. 1993. A conjoint analysis of waterfowl hunting in Louisiana. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25(2):36-45.
6. Gineo, W. M. 1990. A conjoint/logit analysis of nursery stock purchases. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(1):49-58.
7. Green, P. E., and V. Srinivasan. 1978. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5:103-123.