Coyote visitations to experimentally-placed deer carrion

Southwestern Naturalist

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 48-53

  Hein, Eric W ^a,b   Andelt, William F ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030452610     PISSN: 00384909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical data analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
2. ANDELT, W. F., C. E. HARRIS, AND F. F. KNOWLTON. 1985. Prior trap experience might bias coyote responses to scent stations. Southwestern Naturalist 30:317-318.
3. BALSER, D. S. 1965. Tranquilizer tabs for capturing wild carnivores. Journal of Wildlife Management 29:438-442.
4. Beasom, S. L. 1974. Selectivity of predator control techniques in South Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:837-844.
5. BEKOFF, M., AND M. C. WELLS. 1980. The social ecology of coyotes. Scientific American 242:130-148.
6. BOWEN, W. D. 1981. Variation in coyote social organization: the influence of prey size. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:639-652.
7. BOWEN, W. D., AND I. MCTAGGART COWAN. 1980. Scent marking in coyotes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:473-480.
8. CAMENZIND, F. J. 1978. Behavioral ecology of coyotes on the National Elk Wildlife Refuge, Jackson, Wyoming. Pp. 267-294, in Coyotes: biology, behavior, and management (M. Bekoff, ed.). Acad. Press, New York, New York.
9. CLUFF, H. D. 1992. Movements of coyotes in Southwestern Manitoba. Unpubl. M.S. thesis, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 127 pp.
10. CRABTREE, R. L., F. G. BURTON, T. R. GARLAND, D. A. CATALOG, AND W. H. RICKARD. 1989. Slow-release radioisotope implants as individual markers for carnivores. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:949-954.
11. GESE, E. M., AND D. E. ANDERSON. 1993. Success and cost of capturing coyotes, Canis latrans, from all-terrain-vehicles. Canadian Field-Naturalist 107:112-114.
12. GESE, E. M., O. J. RONGSTAD, AND W. R. MYTTON. 1988. Relationship between coyote group size and diet in Southeastern Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management 52:647-653.
13. HARRIS, C. E. 1983. Differential behavior of coyotes with regard to home range limits. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissert., Utah State Univ., Logan.
14. HEIN, E. W. 1992. Evaluations of coyote attractants and a density estimate on the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. Unpubl. M.S. thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.
15. HEIN, E. W., AND W. F. ANDELT. 1994. Evaluation of coyote attractants and an oral delivery device for chemical agents. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22:651-655.
16. HEIN, E. W., AND W. F. ANDELT. 1995. Estimating coyote density from mark-resight surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:164-169.
17. KNOWLTON, F. F., L. A. WINDBERG, AND C. E. WAHLGREN. 1986. Coyote vulnerability to several management techniques. Proceedings of the Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop 7:165-176.
18. LAUNDRÉ, J. W., AND B. L. KELLER. 1981. Home range use by coyotes in Idaho. Animal Behavior 29:449-461.
19. LAUNDRÉ, J. W., AND B. L. KELLER. 1983. Trapp-ability of coyotes relative to home range boundaries. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61:1932-1934.
20. LENTH, R. V. 1981. On finding the source of a signal. Technometrics 23:149-154.
21. LINHART, S. B. 1981. Field evaluation of techniques for reducing coyote predation on livestock. Pp. 1826-1838, in Proceedings of the Worldwide Furbearer Conference, Volume 3 (J. A. Chapman and D. Pursley, eds.). Worldwide Furbearer Conference, Inc., Frostburg, Maryland.
22. LINHART, S. B., G. J. DASCH, C. B. MALE, AND R. M. ENGEMAN. 1986. Efficiency of unpadded and padded steel foothold traps for capturing coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 14:212-218.
23. MOHR, C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37:223-249.
24. NELLIS, C. H. 1968. Some methods for capturing coyotes alive. Journal of Wildlife Management 32:402-405.
25. ROBINSON, W. B. 1948. Thallium and compound 1080 impregnated stations in coyote control. Journal of Wildlife Management 12:279-295.
26. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 1988. SAS/ST AT user's guide, release 6.03 edition. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
27. SCHMUTZ, J. A., AND G. C. WHITE. 1990. Error in telemetry studies: effects of animal movement on triangulation. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:506-510.
28. SMITH, G. J., J. R. GARY, AND O. J. RONGSTAD. 1981. Sampling strategies for radio-tracking coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9:88-93.
29. TODD, A. W.; AND L. B. KEITH. 1983. Coyote demography during a snowshoe hare decline in Al- berta. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:394-404.
30. TURKOWSKI, F. J., A. R. ARMISTEAD, AND S. B. LINHART. 1984. Selectivity and effectiveness of pan tension devices for coyote foothold traps. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:700-708.
31. WHITE, G. C., AND R. A. GARROTT. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, New York, New York.
32. WlNDBERG, L. A., AND F. F. KNOWLTON. 1990. Relative vulnerability of coyotes to some capture procedures. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:282-290.
33. WOODRUFF, R. A., AND B. L. KELLER. 1982. Dispersal, daily activity, and home range of coyotes in Southeastern Idaho. Northwest Science 56:199-207.