Morphometrical characterization of cytisus and allies (Genisteae: Leguminosae) as an aid in taxonomic discrimination

Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 95-114

  González Andrés, Fernando ^a   Ortiz, Jesús María ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAMAECYTISUS; CYTISOPHYLLUM SESSILIFOLIUM; CYTISUS; CYTISUS HETEROCHROUS; CYTISUS PURGANS; CYTISUS SCOPARIUS; CYTISUS VILLOSUS; FABACEAE; GENISTA; GENISTEAE;

EID: 0030451652     PISSN: 07929978     EISSN: 22238980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07929978.1996.10676639     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bentham, G., 1865. Leguminosae. Edited by:Bentham, G., and Hooker, J. D., London:Reeve. Genera Plantarum. Vol 1
2. Birch, A. N.E., Tithecott, M. T., and Bisby, F. A., 1985. Vicia Johannis and wild relatives of the faba bean:A taxonomic study. Econ. Bot., 39:177–190.
3. Bisby, F. A., 1981. “ Tribe 32. Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. (1865) ”. In Advances in Legume Systematics. Vol 1. Kew Royal Botanic Gardens, London Edited by:Polhill, R. M., and Raven, P. H., 409–425.
4. Bisby, F. A., and Nicholls, K. W., 1977. Effects of varying character definitions on classification of Genisteae (Leguminosae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 74:97–121.
5. Clemente-Muñoz, M., and Hernández-Bermejo, J. E., 1978. La corola en la tribu Brassiceae. Anal. Inst. Bot. Cavanilles, 35:297–334.
6. Cristofolini, G., and Chiapella, L. F., 1977. Serological systematics of the tribe Genisteae (Fabaceae). Taxon, 26:43–56.
7. Cristofolini, G., and Chiapella, L. F., 1984. Origin and diversification of “Genisteae” (Fabaceae):a serotaxonomic purview. Webbia, 38:105–122.
8. Eames, A. J., 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. Vol. 1, New York:McGraw-Hill.
9. Emberger, L., 1960. “ In:”. In Traité de Botanique. Edited by:Chadefaud, M., and Emberger, L., Vol. 2, Paris:Masson. Les Végétaux vasculaires
10. Francisco-Ortega, J., Jackson, M. T., Santos-Guerra, A., and Ford-Lloyd, B. V., 1993. Morphological variation in the Chamaecytisus proliferus (L.f.) Link complex (Fabaceae:Genisteae) in the Canary Islands. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 112:187–202.
11. Frodin, D. G., 1965. Generic and sectional limits of Cytisus L. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Liverpool.
12. Gibbs, P. E., and Dingwall, I., 1971. A revision of the genus Teline. Bol. Soc. Brot. 2a Ser., 45:269–316.
13. González-Andrés, F., 1995. Caracterización y evaluación de leguminosas arbustivas del género Cytisus y afines (Genisteae), con potencial interés en sistemas agrosilvopatorales. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
14. González-Andrés, F., and Ortiz, J. M., 1995a. Seed morphology of Cytisophyllum, Cytisus, Chamaecytisus, and Genista (Fabaceae:Genisteae) species for characterization. Seed Sci. Tech., 23:289–300.
15. González-Andrés, F., and Ortiz, J. M., 1995b. RAPD analysis of shrubs belonging to the genus Cytisus and allies (Genisteae:Fabaceae), as an aid for taxonomic discrimination. Isr. J. Plant Sci., 43:303–314.
16. González-Andrés, F., and Ortiz, J. M., 1995c. Isoenzymatic characterization of potentially useful forage shrubs belonging to the genus Cytisus and allies (Genisteae:Leguminosae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 23 (718):813–824.
17. Greinwald, R., Witte, L., Wray, W., and Czygan, F. C., 1991. The alkaloid pattern of Cytisophyllum sessilifolium (Fabaceae-Genisteae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 19:253–258.
18. Heywood, V. H, and Ball, P. W., 1968. “ Leguminosae ”. In Flora Europaea, Vol. Edited by:Tutin, T., Heywood, V., Burges, N., Moore, D., Valentine, D., Walters, S., and Webb, D., 86–93. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 2
19. Le Houérou, H. N., 1993. Land degradation in Mediterranean Europe:Can agroforestry be a part of the solution?. A prospective review. Agroforestry Syst., 21:43–61.
20. Martínez-Laborde, J. B., 1992. Caracteres taxonómicos de cotiledones y pétalos en Diplotaxis DC. (Cruciferae:Brassiceae). Parodiana, 7:41–53.
21. McMillan, C., and Phillips, R. C., 1981. Morphological variation and isozymes of North American Phyllospadix (Potamogetonaceae). Can. J. Bot., 59:1494–1500.
22. Norverto, C. A., González-Andrés, F., and Ortiz, J. M., 1994. Leaf and stem anatomy of species of Cytisophyllum, Cytisus, Chamaecytisus, Genista, Genista secc. Teline (Fabaceae:Genisteae) as an aid for taxonomy. Isr. J. Plant Sci., 42:213–225.
23. Polhill, R. M., 1976. “ Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. and related tribes (Leguminosae) ”. In Botanical Systematics, Vol. 1. London Edited by:Heywood, V. H., 143–368.
24. Potter, D., and Doyle, J. J., 1992. Origins of the African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa, Leguminosae):Evidence from morphology, isozymes, chloroplast DNA and linguistics. Econ. Bot., 46 (3):276–292.
25. Rohlf, F. J., 1990. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.
26. Shevera, M. V., 1993. Palynomorphological peculiarities of the species of genus Chamaecytisus Link (Fabaceae) of Ukrainian flora. Ukr. Bot. Zh., 50:123–127.
27. Sneath, P. H.A., and Sokal, R. R., 1973. Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco:Freeman.
28. Wolff, S. L., and Jefferies, R. L., 1987. Morphological and isozyme variation in Salicornia europaea (s.1.) (Chenopociaceae) in northeastern North America. Can. J. Bot., 65:1410–1419.