« Normal » breast on mammography Variation, pitfall and artefact;Le sein « Normal » en mammographie Variantes, pièges et artefacts

Sein

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 263-270

  Talarmin, B ^a   Garcia, J F ^a   Paule, A M ^a   Le Bivic, T ^a   Bourhis, T ^b   Guenec, Y ^a   Bellet, M ^b  

^a Military Teaching Hospital Clermont Tonnerre   (France)

^b CHU MORVAN   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Normal variation; Pitfall

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN;

EID: 0030450643     PISSN: 11631961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BASSET L.W., HIRBAWI L.A., DE BRUHL N., HAYES M.K., Mammographic positionning : evaluation from the view box. Radiology 1993 ; 188 : 803-806.
2. BASSET L.W., YSRAEL M., GOLD R.H., YSRAEL C., Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 1991, 180: 831-835.
3. BASSET L.W., PAGANI J., GOLD R.H., Pitfalls in mammography. Radiology 1980, 136 : 641-645.
4. BERKOWITZ J.E., GATEWOOD O.M.B., GOLDBLUM L.E., GAYLER B.W., Hormonal replacement therapy : mammographic manifestations. Radiology 1990, 174 : 199-201.
5. BOYD N.F., BYNG J.W., JONG R.A., FISHELL E.K., LITTLE L.E., MILLER A.B., LOCKWOOD G.A., TRITCHLER D.L., YAFFE M.J., Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk : Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1995, 87 : 670-675.
6. BOYD N.F., FISHELL E., JONG R., MAC DONALD J.C., SPARROW R.K., SIMOR I.S., KRIUKOV V., LOCKWOOD G., TRITCHLER D., Mammographic densities as a criterion for entry to a clinical trial of breast cancer prevention. Br. J. Cancer. 1995, 72 : 476-479.
7. BRETON P., «Le sein normal ». A propos de 1000 mammographies de femme de 40 à 70 ans issues d'un dépistage de masse systématique. Thèse médecine. 1995. Montpellier 264 p.
8. CYRLAK D., WONG C.H., Mammographic changes in postmenopausal women undergoing hormonal replacement therapy. AJR 1993, 161 : 1177-1183.
9. D'ORSI C.J., KOPANS D.B., Mammographic feature analysis. Semin. Roentgenol., 1993, 28 : 204-230
10. EKLUND G.W , CARDENOSA G., PARSONS W., Assessing adequacy of mammographi image quality. Radiology 1994, 190 : 297-307.
11. FROUGE C., JURAS J., MIQUEL A., ADRIEN C., BLERY M., Les calcifications mammaires. Feuillet Radiol. 1994, 34 : 357-369.
12. FROUGE C., MIQUEL A., ADRIEN C., BLERY M., Le compte rendu mammographique. Feuillet radiol. 1994, 34 : 402-405.
13. FROUGE C., JURAS J., MIQUEL A., ADRIEN C., BLERY M., Aspects mammographiques liés aux produits de contraste liposolubles persistants après galactographie. Communication. Journée Française de Radiologie, Paris, 1994.
14. GORDENNE W.H., MALCHAIR F.L., Mach bands in mammography. Radiology 1988, 169 : 55-58.
15. GROVE J.S., GOODMAN M.J., GIBERT F.I., MUSSEL H.R., Wolfe's mammographic classification and breast cancer risk : the effect of misclassification on apparent risk ratios. Brit. J. Radiol. 1985, 58 : 15-25.
16. GRUMBACH Y., Exploration radiologique du sein. Masson édit. Paris 1988 : 28-40
17. HOMER M.J., D'ORSI C.J., SIZMAN S.B., Dermal calcifications in fixed orientation : the tattoo sign. Radiology 1994, 192 : 161-163.
18. JENKS S., Dense breast tissues may hold increased cancer risk for some (news). J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1994, 86 : 578-580.
19. KOPANS D.B., An organized approach to breast imaging reporting. Categorial course on breast imaging. Am. Coll. Radiol. 1990, 1 : 113-115
20. KOPANS D.B. Conventional wisdom robservation, experience, anecdote and science in breast imaging. AJR. 1994, 162 : 299-303.
21. KOPANS D.B., SWANN C.A., WHITE G.. Mc CARTHY K.A., HALL D.A., BELMONTE S.J., GALLAGHER W., Asymetric breast tissue. Radiology 1989, 171 : 639-643.
22. LAMARQUE J.L., Le sein. Radiodiagnostic clinique. Medsi. édit Paris 1981.
23. LAMARQUE J.L., PUJOL J., MOUROU M.Y., Les maladies de l'aréole et du mamelon. Cours de perfectionnement post-universitaire. Journée Francophone de Radiologie. Paris. 1992.
24. LAMARQUE J.L., RODIERE M.J., SALICRU B., PUJOL J., BOYER L., CHERIF-CHEIKH J., Corrélations histoanatomoradiologiques du normal au pathologique, in Mammographie - Techniques, Sémiologie - dépistage. Pradel édit. Paris, 1991. 103-129.
25. LAMARQUE J.I.., CHERIF-CHEIKH J., GUERIN B., BRETON P., ROUSSEAU L., BOULET P., DI RUGGIERO F., PUJOL J., DAURES J.P., SEGURET F., Comment, où, quand, commence en imagerie la maladie bénigne du sein ? In les mastopathies bénignes. Arnette. Edit. Paris. 1995. 273-275.
26. MEYER J.E., FERRARO F.A., FRENNA T.H., DIPIRO P.J., DENISSON C.N., Mammographic appearance of normal intramammary lymph nodes in an atypical location. AJR 1993, 161 : 779-780.
27. STOMPER P., VAN VOORHIS B., RAVNIKAR V., MEYER J., Mammographic changes associated with postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy : a longitudinal study. Radiology 1990, 174 : 487-490.
28. SAFTLAS A.F., HOOVER R.N., BRINTON L.A., SZKLO M., OLSON D.R., SALANE M., WOLFE J.N., Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer. 1991, 67 : 2833-2838.
29. WILLEMIN A., Les enveloppes mammaires in les images mammographiques. Karger. Edit. Basel 1972 : 38-47.
30. WOLFE J.N., Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. Radiology 1976, 121 : 545-552.
31. WOLFE J.N., Breast patterns as an index of risk for developping breast cancer. AJR 1976, 126 : 1130-1139.