Joint kinetics in unilateral below-knee amputee patients during running

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 77, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 1279-1285

  Sanderson, David J ^a   Martin, Philip E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BELOW KNEE AMPUTATION; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; KINETICS; LEG PROSTHESIS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; RUNNING; VELOCITY; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 0030447524     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90193-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brouwer BJ, Allard P, Labelle H. Running patterns of juveniles wearing SACH and single-axis foot components. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:128-34.
2. Hurley GRB, McKenney R, Robinson M, Zadravec M, Pierrynow-ski MR. The role of the contralateral limb in below-knee amputee gait. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990;14:33-42.
3. Gitter A, Czerniecki JM, DeGroot DM. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:142-8.
4. Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH Foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:853-61.
5. Macfarlane PA, Nielsen DH, Shurr DG, Meier K. Gait comparisons for below-knee amputees using a Flex-foot versus a conventional prosthetic foot. J Prosthet Orthot 1991;3:150-61.
6. Menard MR, McBride ME, Sanderson DJ, Murray DD. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:451-8.
7. Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield SL. Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Develop 1990;27:369-84.
8. Winter DA, Sienko SE. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biom 1988;21:361-8.
9. Wirta RW, Mason R, Calvo K, Golbranson FL. Effect on gait using various prosthetic ankle-foot devices. J Rehabil Res Develop 1991; 28:13-24.
10. Enoka RM, Miller DI, Burgess EM. Below-knee amputee running gait. Am J Phys Med 1982;61:66-84.
11. Miller DI. Resultant lower extremity joint moments in below-knee amputees during running stance. J Biom 1987;20:529-41.
12. Miller DI, Enoka RM, McCulloch RG, Burgess EM, Frankel VH. Vertical ground reaction force time histories of lower extremity amputee runners. In: Morecki A, Fidelus K, Kedzior K, Wit A, editors. Proceedings of VIIth Congress of Biomechanics: 1979 July; Warsaw, Poland. Baltimore (MD): University Park Press, 1979: 453-60.
13. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A, Munro C. Joint moments and muscle power output characteristics of below-knee amputees during run-ning: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet. J Biom 1991; 24:63-75.
14. Herzog W, Nigg B, Read L, Olsson E. Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989;21:110-4.
15. Hamill J, Bates B, Knutzen K. Ground reaction force symmetry during walking and running. Res Quart Ex Sport 1984;55:289-93.
16. Jackson KM. Fitting of mathematical functions to biomechanical data. IEEE Trans Eng 1979;26:122-4.
17. Bresler B, Frankel JP. The forces and moments in the leg during level walking. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 1950;72:27-36.
18. Dempster W. Space requirements of the seated operator. Dayton (OH): Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Report No. WADC-TR-55-159, 1955.
19. Sanderson DJ, McBride ME. Biomechanical symmetry in the presence of structural asymmetry during running. In: Dillman C, Nelson R, Nigg B, Voy R, Newsom M, editors. Proceedings of the First International Olympic Committee World Congress on Sport Science: 1989 Oct 28-Nov 3; Colorado Springs, CO. Colorado Springs: US Olympic Committee Department of Educational Services, 1989: 320-1.
20. Winter D. Overall principle of lower limb support during stance phase of gait. J Biom 1980;13:923-7.
21. Winter D. Moments of force and mechanical power during jogging. J Biom 1983;16:191-7.
22. Vaughan CL. Biomechanics of running gait. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1985;12:1-48.
23. Winter DA. Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait. Variability and compensating effects. Human Mov Sc 1984;3:51-76.
24. Sanderson DJ, Franks IM, Elliott D. The effect of targeting on the ground reaction forces during walking. J Hum Mov Sci 1992;11: 1-11.
25. Patla AE, Robinson C, Samways M, Armstrong C. Visual control of step length during overground locomotion: Task-specific modulation of the locomotor synergy. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1989;15:603-61.
26. Patla AE. In search of laws for the visual control of locomotion. Some observations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1989;15: 624-8.