Increasing regulators' confidence in point-nonpoint pollutant trading schemes

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1187-1193

  Taff, Steven J ^c   Senjem, Norman ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Nonpoint pollution control; Point nonpoint pollution; Pollutant trading; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030447386     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1996.tb03489.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Apogee Research, Inc., 1992. Incentive Analyses for CWA Reauthorization: Point Source/Nonpoint Source Trading for Nutrient Discharge Reductions. Report for USEPA, Office of Water.
2. Dales, J., 1968. Pollution, Property, Prices. University Press, Toronto, Canada.
3. David, M. and E. Joeres (Editors), 1983. Buying a Better Environment: Cost-Effective Regulation through Permit Trading. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
4. Letson, D., 1992. Point/Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Trading: An Interpretive Survey. Natural Resources Journal 32:219-32.
5. Malik, A. S., B. A. Larson, and M. Ribaudo, 1994. Economic Incentives for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. Water Resources Bulletin 30(3):471-480.
6. Malik, A. S., D. Letson, and S. R. Crutchfield, 1993. Point/Nonpoint Source Trading of Pollution Abatement: Choosing the Right Trading Ratio. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75:959-67.
7. New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP), 1993. New York City's 1993 Long-Term Watershed Protection and Filtration Avoidance Program, New York, New York.
8. Senjem, N., 1995. Pollutant Trading for Water Quality Improvement: A Policy Evaluation. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, Minnesota (unpublished report to USEPA).
9. U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO), 1992. Water Pollution: Pollutant Trading Could Reduce Compliance Costs If Uncertainties Are Resolved. GAO/RCED-92-153, Washington, D.C.
10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1980. Innovative and Alternative Technology Assessment Manual. Office of Water Program Operations, Washington D.C.
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995. Effluent Trading in Watersheds: Policy Statement. Washington, D.C.