Recent postglacial rebound, gravity change and mantle flow in Fennoscandia

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 229-234

  Ekman, Martin ^a   Mäkinen, Jaakko ^b  

^a National Land Survey   (Sweden)

^b FINNISH GEODETIC INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Fennoscandian uplift; Glacial rebound; Gravity

Indexed keywords

GRAVITY; MANTLE FLOW; POSTGLACIAL REBOUND; UPLIFT; VISCOUS FLOW;

EUROPE, FENNOSCANDIA;

EID: 0030446798     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb05281.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cathles, L.M., 1975. The viscosity of the Earth's mantle, Princeton University Press.
2. Ekman, M., 1991a. A concise history of postglacial land uplift research (from its beginning to 1950), Terra Nova, 3, 358-365.
3. Ekman, M., 1991b. Gravity change, geoid change and remaining postglacial uplift of Fennoscandia, Terra Nova, 3, 390-392.
4. Ekman, M., 1993. Postglacial rebound and sea level phenomena, with special reference to Fennoscandia and the Baltic Sea, in Geodesy and Geophysics, pp. 7-70, ed. Kakkuri, J., Publ. Finnish Geod. Inst., 115.
5. Ekman, M., 1996. A consistent map of the postglacial uplift of Fennoscandia, Terra Nova, 8, in press.
6. Ekman, M. & Mäkinen, J., 1990. Land uplift and gravity change in Fennoscandia 1966-1989, Bureau Gravimetrique Int., Bull. d'Information, 67, 114-117.
7. Ekman, M., Mäkinen, J., Midtsundstad, Å. & Remmer, O., 1987. Gravity change and land uplift in Fennoscandia 1966-1984, Bull. Géod., 61, 60-64.
8. Fjeldskaar, W., 1994. Viscosity and thickness of the asthenosphere detected from the Fennoscandian uplift, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 126, 399-410.
9. Fjeldskaar, W. & Cathles, L.M., 1991. The present rate of uplift of Fennoscandia implies a low-viscosity asthenosphere, Terra Nova, 3, 393-400.
10. Honkasalo, T. & Kukkamäki, T.J., 1963. On the use of gravity measurement for investigation of the land upheaval in Fennoscandia, Fennia, 89/1, 21-24.
11. Kääriäkinen, E., 1966. The second levelling of Finland in 1935-1955, Publ. Finnish geod. Inst., 61.
12. Kiviniemi, A., 1974. High precision measurements for studying the secular variation in gravity in Finland, Publ. Finnish geod. Inst., 78.
13. Lambeck, K., Johnston, P. & Nakada, M., 1990. Holocene glacial rebound and sea-level change in NW Europe, Geophys. J. Int., 103, 451-468.
14. Mäkinen, J., Ekman, M., Midtsundstad, Å. & Remmer, O., 1986. The Fennoscandian land uplift gravity lines 1966-1984, Rep. Finnish geod. Inst., 85:4.
15. Mäkinen, J. et al., 1996. The Fennoscandian land uplift gravity lines 1986-1993, in preparation.
16. Mitrovica, J.X. & Peltier, W.R., 1989. Pleistocene deglaciation and the global gravity field, J. geophys. Res., 94 B, 13 651-13 671.
17. Mitrovica, J.X. & Peltier, W.R., 1993. The inference of mantle viscosity from an inversion of the Fennoscandian relaxation spectrum, Geophys. J. Int., 114, 45-62.
18. Mörner, N.-A., 1980. The Fennoscandian uplift: geological data and their geodynamical implication, in Earth rheology, isostasy and eustasy, pp. 251-284, ed. Mörner, N.-A., John Wiley & Sons.
19. Mörner, N.-A., 1990. Glacial isostasy and long-term crustal movements in Fennoscandia with respect to lithospheric and asthenospheric processes and properties, Tectonophysics, 176, 13-24.
20. Mörner, N.-A. 1991a. Course and origin of the Fennoscandian uplift: The case for two separate mechanisms, Terra Nova, 3, 408-413.
21. Mörner, N.-A., 1991b. Reply to Wolf (1991), Tectonophysics, 195, 445-446.
22. Nakiboglu, S.M. & Lambeck, K., 1991. Secular sea-level change, in Glacial isostasy, sea-level and mantle rheology, pp. 237-258, eds Sabadini, R. et al., Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Nansen, F., 1928. The Earth's crust, its surface-forms, and isostatic adjustment, R. Acad. Sci. Oslo, 12, 1-121.
24. O'Connell, R.J., 1976. The effects of mantle phase changes on postglacial rebound, J. geophys. Res., 81, 971-974.
25. Peltier, W.R., 1974. The impulse response of a Maxwell Earth, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 12, 649-669.
26. Peltier, W.R., 1982. Dynamics of the Ice Age Earth, Advances in Geophys., 24, 1-146.
27. Sjöberg, L.E., Nord, T. & Fan, H., 1992. The Fennoscandian geoid bulge and its correlation with land uplift and Moho depth, in Nord, T., Numerical studies in physical geodesy, pp. 1-14, PhD thesis, Royal Inst. Technology, Stockholm.
28. Suutarinen, O., 1983. Recomputation of land uplift values in Finland, Rep. Finnish geod. Inst., 83:1.
29. Ussisoo, I., 1977. Computation of land uplift and mean sea level in Sweden, Geol. Fören. Stockholm Förhandlingar, 99, 42-48.
30. Wolf, D., 1987. An upper bound on lithosphere thickness from glacoisostatic adjustment in Fennoscandia, J. Geophys., 61, 141-149.
31. Wolf, D., 1991. Comment on Mörner (1990), Tectonophysics, 195, 443-444.
32. Wolf, D., 1993. The changing role of the lithosphere in models of glacial isostasy: a historical review, Global planet. Change, 8, 95-106.