Law and large carnivore conservation in the Rocky Mountains of the U.S. and Canada;Leyes y conservacion de carnivoros en las Montanas Rocallosas de los Estados Unidos y Canada

Conservation Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1003-1012

  Keiter Harvey Locke, Robert B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and MacKimmie Matthews   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; LARGE CARNIVORE; LEGISLATION;

CANADA, ROCKY MOUNTAINS; USA, ROCKY MOUNTAINS;

EID: 0030446284     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041003.x     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities 115 S.Ct. 2407 (1995).
2. Hader, M. 1992 The need for an ecosystem approach to endangered species protection. Public Land Law Review 13:137-147.
3. Boundary Waters Treaty. 1909. 36 Stat. 2448, T.S. No. 548.
4. British Columbia Government. 1995. The East Kootenay land-use plan. British Columbia Government, Victoria.
5. Canada Wildlife Act. 1973-1974. S.C. 1973-74 c. W-9.
6. Christy v. Hoclcl 857 F.2d 1324 9th Cir. (1988).
7. Coggins, G. 1980. Wildlife and the constitution: the walls come tumbling down. Washington Law Review 55:295-358.
8. Coggins, G. 1987. Protecting the wildlife resources of national parks from external threats. Land and Water Law Review 22:1-27.
9. Coggins, G., and M. Ward. 1981. The law of wildlife management on the federal public lands. Oregon Law Review 60:59-155.
10. Commission on Resources and Environment. 1994. East Kootenay boundary land use plan. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
11. Commission on Resources and Environment Act. 1992. S.B.C. 1992 c.34.
12. Conner i: Bnrfonl848 F.2d 1441 9th Cir. (1988).
13. Convention on Biological Diversity. 1992. 31 I.L.M. 818.
14. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. 1973. 27 U.S.T. 1087(1973).
15. Corn, M., and R. Gone. 1986. Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: an analysis of data submitted by federal and state agencies, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Conim. Print no. 6. Congressional Research Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
16. Defenders of Wildlife t: Andnts 627 P.2d 1238 D.C. Cir. (1980).
17. Dolan r. City ofTigard 114 S. Ct. 2309 (1994).
18. Ecological Reserve Act. 1979. R.S.B.C. 1979C.101.
19. Elgie, S. 1992. Federal species protection legislation: The first step in protecting biological diversity. Sierra Legal Defense Fund, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
20. Endangered Species Act. 1973. 16 U.S.C. §1531 et seq. 1976, 1978, 1979, 1982, 1986, and 1988.
21. Energy Resources Conservation Act. 1980. R.S.A. 1980 cE-11.
22. Environment and Land Use Act. 1979. R.S.B.C. 1979 c.110.
23. Fischer, II. 1991. Discord over wolves. Defenders 66(4):35-39.
24. Forest Act. 1979. R.S.B.C. 1979c.140.
25. Forest Practices Code. 199i. S.B.C. 1994 c.41.
26. France, T., and J. Tuholske. 1986. Stay the hand: New directions for the Endangered Species Act. Public Land Law Review 7:1-19.
27. Friends of the Oldinan Rirer v. Canada 132 N.R. 321 S.C.C. (1992).
28. Fund for Animals, Inc. v. TnrnerWL 206232 D.D.C. (1991).
29. Fund for Animals v. Babbitt 90) F. Supp. 96 D.D.C. (1995).
30. Game Export Act. 1985. R.S.C. 1985 c.G-1.
31. Hogg, P. 1992. Constitutional law of Canada. 3rd edition. Carswell, Ontario, Canada.
32. Hughes v. Oklahoma 441 U.S. 322 (1979).
33. Itilaml Umpire Public Lands Council r. Schnitz 992 F.2d 977 9th Cir. (1993).
34. Keiler, R. 1991. Observations on the future debate over "delisting" the grizzly bear in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem."The Environmental Professional 13:248-253.
35. Keiter, R. 1994. Beyond the boundary line: Constructing a law of ecosystem management. University of Colorado Law Review 65:294-333.
36. Land Act. 1979. R.S.B.C. 1979c.214.
37. Locke, II. 1994. Preserving the wild heart of North America. Borealis 5:20-27;
38. Wild Earth 3(4):63-72.
39. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council 112 S. Ct. 2886 (1992).
40. Lund, T. 1980. American wildlife law. University of California Press, Berkeley.
41. Marble Mountain Ainlnbon Society r. Rice 914 F.2d 179 9th Cir. (1990).
42. Migrator}- Birds Convention Act. 1994. .S.C. 1994 c. 22.
43. Montana Environmental Policy Act. 1971. Mont. Code Ann. § 75-1-101.
44. Montana Nongame and Endangered Species Act. 1973. Mont. Code Ann. § 87-5-101 et seq.
45. Mountain States Legal Foundation i: Hodel 799 F.2d 1423 10th Cir. (1986).
46. Multiple Use-Sustained Yield Act. 1960. 16U.S.C. §§528-31.
47. Municipal District of Pincher Creek General Municipal Plan. 1987. Bylaw no. 809.
48. Municipal Government Amendment Act. 1995. S.A. 1995 c. 24.
49. National Environmental Policy Act. 1970. 42 U.S.C. §4332(2)(C) (supra. 1969).
50. National Forest Management Act. 1976. 16 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.
51. National Park Service "Organic" Act. 1916. 16 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
52. National Parks Act. 1988. S.C. 1988 c. 48.
53. Xattonal Wildlife Federation v. National Park Service 699 F. Supp. 384 D. Wyo. (1987).
54. Natural Resources Conservation Board Act. 1990. S.A. 1990 c.N-5-5.
55. Newmark, W. D. 1987. A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North American parks. Nature 325:430-432.
56. Kartb Fork Preservation Association v. Department of State Lands 778 P.2d 862 Mont. (1989).
57. Northern Spotted Oui v. Hodel 716 F. Supp. 479 W.D. Wash. (1988).
58. Noss, R., and A. Coopcrrider. 1994. Saving nature's legacy: Protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, U.C.
59. O'Brien v. State 711 P.2cl 1144 Wyo. (1986).
60. Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas 30 F.3d 1050 9th Cir. (1994).
61. Paquet, P. C. 1993. Summary reference document-ecological studies of rccolonizing wolves in the central Canadian Rocky Mountains. Final report. Parks Canada, Banff National Park, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
62. Paquet, P., and A. Hackman. 1995. Urge carnivore conservation in the Rocky Mountains. World Wildlife Fund, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
63. Park Act. 1979. R.S.B.C. 1979c.309.
64. Parks Canada. 1994. Initial assessment of proposed improvements to the TransCanada highway in Banff National Park phase IIIA, Sunshine Interchange to Castle Mountain Interchange. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
65. Provincial Parks Act. 1980. U.S.A. 1980 cP-22.
66. Reed, S. 1994. The county supremacy movement: mendacious myth marketing. Idaho Law Review 30:525-553.
67. Robertsim v. Melbaw Valley Citizens Council 490 U.S. 332 (1989).
68. Robertsan v. Steinbauer 33 Alta LR. 3rd 422 Q.B. (1995).
69. Rounthwaite, I. L. 1981-1982. The national parks of Canada: an endangered species? Saskatchewan Law Review 46:1.
70. Sax, J. 1993. Property rights and the economy of nature: Understand-Ing Lucas v. South Carolina Constat Council. Stanford Law Review 45:1-433-1-155.
71. Seattle Amdubon Society v. Ih-iins 952 F.2d 297 9th Cir. (1991).
72. Seattle Ailclilbon Society v. Lyons K7 F. Supp. 1291 W.D. Wash. (1994).
73. Sliaffcr, M. 1992. Keeping the grizzly bear in the American West: an alternative recover}' plan. The Wilderness Society, Washington, D.C.
74. Sierra Club r. 1-sjiy 38 F.3d 792 5th Cir. (1994).
75. Sierra Club t: Marita 843 F. Supp. 1526 E.D. Wise. (1994), affirmed, 46 F.3d 606 7th Cir. (1995).
76. Sierra Club r. Robcrtson 810 F. Supp. 1021 W.O. Ark. (1992).
77. Silverstone, S. 1974. Canadian park systems as open space: how much protection? Chitty's Law Journal 22:9.
78. Sunshine Village Corjxiration v. Minister of Ijirironinent et al. T-137-94 Fed Ct. T.I). (1994).
79. Siran Vieir Coalition, Inc. r. Turner 824 F. Supp. 923 1). Mont. (1992).
80. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill 437 U.S. 153 (1978).
81. Thomas v. Peterson 753 F.2d 754 9th Cir. (1985).
82. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1985. Flathead National Forest plan. Kalispell, Montana.
83. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1986. Lewis and Clark National Forest plan. Great Falls, Montana.
84. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Grizzly bear recover)' plan. Missoula, Montana.
85. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. The reintroduction of gray wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Central Idaho. Final environmental impact statement. Helena, Montana.
86. United States t: St. Onge 676 F. Supp. 1044 I). Mont. (1988).
87. Wild Animal and Plant Protection Act. 1992. S.C. 1992 c. 52.
88. Wilderness Areas, Ecological Reserves and the Natural Areas Act. 1980. R.S.A. 1980 c W-8.
89. Wildlife Act. 1982. S.B.C. 1982 c.57.
90. Wildlife Act. 1987. S.A. 1987 c. W-9.1.
91. Wildlife Amendment Act. 1996. S.A. 1996.
92. Wilkinson, C., and M. Anderson. 1985. Land and resource planning in the national forests. Oregon Law Review 64:1-373.
93. Willmore Wilderness Park Act. 1980. R.S.A. 1980 c W-10.
94. Willmore Wilderness Park Amendment Act. 1995. S.A. 1995 c. 38.
95. Williams, F. 1994. Land use plan is disemboweled. High Country News 26 December:6-7.