Improving the fit between research and practice in health promotion: Overcoming structural barriers

Canadian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 87, Issue SUPPL. 2, 1996, Pages

  Nutbeam, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLIC HEALTH;

HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERIODICALS; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 0030445366     PISSN: 00084263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Nutbeam D, Smith C, Catford J. Evaluation in health education: A review of progress, possibilities, and problems. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1930;44:83-89.
2. Nutbeam D, Wise M. Planning for Health for All: International experience in setting health goals and targets. Health Prom Int 1996;11(3):219-26.
3. Goodman RM, McLeroy KR, Steckler AB, Hoyle RH. Development of a level of institutionalisation scales for health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1993;20(2):161-78.
4. Allensworth DD. The research base for innovative practices in school health education at the secondary level. J School Health 1994;64(5):180-87.
5. Orlandi M. The diffusion and adoption of work-site health promotion innovations: An analysis of barriers. Prev Med 1986;15:522-36.
6. Parcel GS, Taylor WC, Brink SG, et al. Translating theory into practice: Intervention strategies for the diffusion of a health promotion innovation. Family and Community Health 1989;12(3):1-13.
7. Glynn TJ. Essential elements of school-based smoking-prevention programs. J School Health 1989;59(5):181-88.
8. Sanson-Fisher R, Campbell E. Health Research in Australia - Its role in achieving the goals and targets. Health Prom J Australia 1994;3:28-33.
9. Chapman S. Unravelling gossamer with boxing gloves: Problems in explaining the decline in smoking. Br Med J 1993;307:429-32.
10. Nutbeam D. Achieving 'best practice' in health promotion: Improving the fit between research and practice. Health Educ Res 1996;11(3):317-20.
11. Green LW, Kreuter M. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1991.
12. World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva: WHO, 1986.
13. Bracht N, Finnegan JR, Rissel C, et al. Community ownership and program continuation Following a health demonstration project. Health Educ Res 1994;9(2):243-55.
14. Oberle MW, Baker EL, Magenheim MJ. Healthy People 2000 and Community Health Planning. Annu Rev Public Health 1994;15:259-75.
15. Rigby K, Brown MW, Anagnostou P, et al. Shock tactics to counter AIDS: The Australian experience. Psychology and Health 1989;3(3):145-60.
16. Rhodes T. The politics of anti-drug campaigns. Druglink 1990;5(3):16-18.
17. Frenck J. Balancing relevance and excellence: Organizational responses to link research with decision-making. Soc Sci Med 1992;35(11):1397-404.
18. Whitelaw A, Williams J. Relating health education research to health policy. Health Educ Res 1994;9(4):519-26.
19. Evidence-based medicine working group: Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268(17):2420-25.
20. International Union for Health Promotion and Education. Instrument for Analysing the Effectiveness of Studies on Health Promotion and Education (and series of 16 publications). Utrecht: IUHPE (European Office), 1994.
21. Hawe P, Degeling D, Hall J. Evaluating Health Promotion: A Health Workers Guide. Sydney: McLennan and Petty, 1990.
22. Shea S, Basch CE. A review of five major community based cardiovascular disease prevention programs, Part II: Intervention strategies, evaluation methods and results. Am J Health Prom 1990;4(4):279-87.
23. Mullen PD, Mains DA, Velez R. A meta-analysis of controlled trials in cardiac patient education. Patient Education and Counselling 1992;14:143-62.
24. Bruvold WH. A meta-analysis of adolescent smoking prevention programs. Am J Public Health 1993;83(6):872-80.