Muscle proteins - Their actions and interactions

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 781-789

  Holmes, Kenneth C ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; MUSCLE PROTEIN; MYOSIN; MYOSIN SUBFRAGMENT 1;

ACTIN MYOSIN INTERACTION; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; REVIEW;

EID: 0030444538     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80008-X     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Lymn RW, Taylor EW: Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis of actomyosin. Biochemistry 1 971, 10:461 7-4624.
2. Huxley HE: The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science 1969, 164:1355-1366.
3. Rayment l, Holden HM, Whittaker M, Yohn CB, Lorenz M, Holmes KG, Milligan RA: Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. Science 1993, 261:58-65.
4. Goody RS, Holmes KC: Cross-bridges and the mechanism of muscle contraction. Biochim Biophys Acta 1983, 726:13-39.
5. Cooke R: The mechanism of muscle contraction. CflC Crit Rev Biochem 1966, 21:53-118.
6. Huxley AF, Simmons R: Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature 1971, 233:533-538.
7. Huxley H: The working stroke of myosin crossbridges, Biophys J Suppt 1995, 68:57-58. Initially it was assumed thai all the elasticity of contracting muscle was in the cross-bridges. New evidence presented here shows that up to half the compliance is in the thick and thin filaments.
8. Geeves MA, Conibear PB The role of three-state docking of myosin S1 with actin in force generation. Biophys J Suppl 1995, 68:199-201, The evidence for multiple-step binding of myosin S1 to actin is summarized in this review.
9. Brenner B, Schoenberg M, Chalovich JM, Greens LE, Eisenberg E: Evidence for cross-bridge attachment in relaxed muscle at low ionic strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982, 79:7288-7291.
10. Pollard TD, Bhandari D, Maupin P, Wachstock D, Weeds A, Zol H: Direct visualization by electron microscopy of the weakly-bound intermediates in the actomyosin ATPase cycle. Bhphys J 1993, 64:454-471.
11. Holmes KC: The actomyosin interaction and its control by tropomyosin. Biophys J Suppl 1995, 66:6-7.
12. Kabsch W, Mannherz HG, Suck D, Pai EF, Holmes KC: Atomic structure of the actin:DNase I complex Nature 1990, 347:37-44.
13. Holmes KC, Popp D, Gebhard W, Kabsch W: Atomic model of the aeon filament Nature 1990, 347:44-49.
14. Lorenz M, Popp D, Holmes KC: Refinement of the F-actin model against X-ray fiber diffraction data by the use of a directed mutation algorithm. J Mol Bhl 1993, 234:826-836.
15. Payment I, Rypniewski WR, Schmidt-Base K, Smith R, Tomchick DR, Benning MM, Winkelmann DA, Wesenbarg G, Holden HM: Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. Science 1993, 261:50-58.
16. Malta T, Yajima E, Magata S, Miyanishi T, Nakayama S, Matsuda G: The primary structure of skeletal muscle heavy chain. IV. Sequence of the rod, and the complete 1938-residue sequence of the heavy chain. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1991, 110:75-87.
17. Payment I, Smith CA, Yount R: The active site of myosin. Annu Rev Physiol 1996, 58:671 -702. The effecls of nucleotide binding on the reactivity of the two reactive sulfhydryls (SH1 and SH2) in myosin are discussed in this review The origin of the intrinsic fluorescence of myosin S1, which changes with the state of hydrolysis, is also discussed.
18. Mornet D, Partei P, Audemard E, Kassab R: The limited tryptic cleavage of chymotryptic S1: an approach to the characterisation of the actin site in myosin heads. Biochem Bhphys Res Commun 1979, 89:925-932.
19. Pai EF, Kabsch W, Krengel U, Holmes KC, John J, Wittinghofer A: Structure of the guanine-nucleotide-binding domain of the Haras oncogene product p21 in the tri phosphate conformation. Nature 1989,341:209-214
20. Cope TV, Whisstock J, Rayment I, Kendrick Jones J: Conservation within the myosin motor domain: implications for structure and function. Structure 1996. 4:969-987 A comparison of over 80 myosin sequences from many sources is used to build an evolutionary tree. The comparison reveals that there is a 'core' myosin, which does not include the light-chain binding region, that is well conserved from yeast to man.
21. Houdusse A, Cohen C: Structure of the regulatory domain of scallop myosin at 2A resolution: implications for regulation. Structure 1996, 4:21-32. The name 'converter domain' is introduced lor the small domain that acts as a socket for the arm lever.
22. Schroeder RR, Manstein DJ, Jahn W, Holden H, Rayment I, Holmes KC, Spudich JA: Three-dimensional atomic model of F-actin decorated with Dictyostetium myosin S1. Nature 1993, 364:171-174.
23. Fisher AJ, Smith CA, Thoden J, Smith R, Sutoh K, Holden HM, Rayment I: Structural studies of myosin:nucleotide complexes: a revised model for the molecular basis of muscle contraction. Biophys J Suppl 1995, 68:27-28 New structures show that the anticipated closing of the nucleotide-binding pocket on binding nucleotide does not take place, which necessitates same revision of the model of muscle contraction presented In [3].
24. Huston EE, Grammer JC, Yount RG: Flexibility of the myosin heavy chain: direct evid.ence that the region containing SH1 and SH2 can move 10A under the influence of nucleotide binding. Biochemistry 19B8, 27:8945-8952.
25. Uyeda T, Abramson PD, Spudich JA: The neck region of the myosin motor domain acts as a lever arm to generate movement Proc Nail Acad Sei USA 1996, 93:4459-4464. See annotation [26].
26. Arson M, Geeves MA, Kurzawa SE, Manstein D: Myosin motors with artificial lever arms. EMSO J 1996,15:101-106. These two papers [25**,26**] lend new support to the lever-arm hypothesis.
27. Parterson B, Spudich JA: Cold-sensitive mutations of Dictyostelium myosin heavy-chain highlight functional domains of the myosin motor. Genefics 1996, 143:801-810.
28. Kinose F, Wang SX, Kidambi US, Moncman CL, Winkelmann DA: Glycine 699 is pivotal for the motor activity of skeletal muscle myosin. J Cell Bml 1996, in press, This paper demonstrates that one extra methyl group (at 699gg) in tha middle of the putative hinge of the lever arm can slow the myosin motor by a factor of 100.
29. Jontes JD, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Milligan RA : The brush border myosin-1 tail swings through a 32* arc upon ADP release. Nature 1995,378:751-753 See annotation (30"j.
30. Whittaker M. Wilson-Kubalek EM, Smith JE, Faust L, Milligan RA, Sweeney HL: Smooth muscle myosin moves 35 Åupon ADP release. Nature 1995, 378:748-751. Two very important papers [29**,30**] that demonstrate unambiguously a movement within myosin S1 is produced on the binding ot a nucleotide.
31. Irving M, Alien TS, Sabido-David C, Craik JS, Brandrneier B, Kendrick-Jones J, Corrie JE, Trentham DR, Goldman YE: Tilting of the light-chain region of myosin during step length changes and active force generation in skeletal muscle [see comments]. Nature 1995, 375:688-691.
32. Alien TS, Sabido-David C, Ling N, Irving M, Goldman YE: Transients of fluorescence polarization in skeletal muscle fibers labeled with rhodamine on the regulatory light chain. Biophys J Suppl 1 995, 66:85-86.
33. Smith CA, Rayment I: X-ray structure of the magnesium(ll)-yrophosphate complex of,the truncated head of Dictyostelium discoideum myosin to 2,7 A resolution. Biochemistry 1995, 34:8973-8981. The structure of D. discoideum myosin is similar to that of chicken S1 without nucleotide bound.
34. Fisher AJ, Smith CA, Thoden JB, Smith R, Sutoh K, Holder HM, Rayment I: X-ray structures of the myosin motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum complexed with MgADP-BeF( and MgADP-AIF4. Biochemistry 1995, 34:8960-8972. The structure ol D. discoideum myosin with ADPBeFx, which is an ana logue o( ATP, also appears to be very similar to that ol chicken S1 without bound nucleotide (see annotation |33*]), whereas the structure with bound ADP-AIFa shows more similarity to the structure with bound ADP vanadate 135"),
35. Smith CA, Raymeni I: X-ray structure of the magnesium(ii)1 ADP-vanadate complex of the Dictyostellum discoideum myosin motor domain to 1.9 A resolution. Biochemistry 1996, 35:5404-541 7. This Is a very important structure which appears to provide an atomic model of the beginning of the power stroke.
36. Stona DB, Schneider DK. Huang Z, Mendelson R: The radius of gyration of native and reductively methylated myosin subfragment-1 from neutron scattering. Biophys J 1995, 69:767-776.
37. Johnson K, Taylor EW: Intermediate states of subfragment 1 and actosubfragmentl ATPase: reevaluation of the mechanism. Biochemistry 1978, 17:3432-3442.
38. Smith CA, Rayment I : Active site comparisons highlight structural similarities between myosin and other P-loop proteins. Biophys J 1 996, 70:1590-1 602. An illuminating comparison of active sites which points out the great similarity of mechanism and structure between the myosin ATPase and the G-proteins GTPase.
39. ras and other GTP-binding proteins. War Struct Biol 1995, 2:36-43. The current model for the mechanism of hydrolysis of GTP by G proteins is presented.
40. Ruppel KM, Spudich JA: Structure-function studies of the myosin motor domain: importance of the 50-kDa cleft Mol Bio! Cei! 1996, 7:1123-1136. This paper shows by mutational analysis that Glu468(gg) is essential tor ATPase activity.
41. Yount RG, Lawson O, Rayment I: Is myosin a 'back door' enzyme? Biophys J Supp! 1995, 6B:47-49 The hypothesis is presented that the γP, leaves myosin by a different route from that by which it came in.
42. Mendelson R, Schneider D, Stone D. Conformations of myosin subfragment-1 ATPase intermediates from neutron and x-ray scattering. ; Mol Biol 1996, 256:1-7 A careful analysis which shows that the conformation of myosin S1 in solution is simitar in rigor and with ATP bound but is different when the products complex (ADP-Pj) is bound,
43. Wray J: Structure of relaxed myosin filaments in relation to nucleotide state in vertebrate skeletal muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 1987, 6:62.
44. Schrumpf M, Wray J: Structural effects of AI-F and Be-F as analogues of Pi in skeletal muscle myosin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 1992, 13:254.
45. Micholls A, Sharp KA Honig B: Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 1991, 11:2B1 -296.