Infrared pupillometry in presbyopes fitted with soft contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 73, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 733-741

  Chateau, Nicolas ^a,d   De Brabander, John ^b   Bouchard, Florence ^a   Molenaar, Henk ^c  

^a Research and Development Center   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Lunelle BV   (Netherlands)

^d Essilor Optique de Contact   (France)

Author keywords

multifocal contact lenses; presbyopia; pupil; soft contact lenses

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENSES; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISION AIDS;

INFRARED PUPILLOMETRY; MULTIFOCAL CONTACT LENSES; PRESBYOPIA; SOFT CONTACT LENSES;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFRARED RADIATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; PUPILLOMETRY; SOFT CONTACT LENS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFRARED RAYS; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPES; PRESBYOPIA; PUPIL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0030443150     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199612000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Charman WN, Saunders B. Theoretical and practical factors influencing the optical performance of contact lenses for the presbyope. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1990;13:67-75.
2. Baude D, Miège C. Presbyopia compensation with contact lenses - a new aspheric progressive lens. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1992;15:7-15.
3. Baude D. Caractérisation, optimisation et réalisation de composants optiques multifocaux diffractifs et réfractifs. 1990. PhD Thesis. Université de Paris-Sud-France.
4. Borish IM. Pupil dependency of bifocal contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:417-23.
5. Erickson P, Robboy M, Apollonio BS, Jones WF. Optical design considerations for contact lens bifocals. J Am Optom Assoc 1988;59:198-202.
6. Birren JE, Casperson RC, Botwinick J. Age changes in pupil size. J Gerontol 1950;5:216-24.
7. Kadlecova V, Peleska M, Vasko A. Dependence on age of the diameter of the pupil in the dark. Nature 1958;182: 1520-1.
8. Loewenfeld IE. Pupillary changes related to age. In: Thompson HS, ed. Topics in Neuro-ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1979:124-50.
9. Thompson HS. The pupil. In: Moses RA, ed. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. 7th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1981:326-56.
10. Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE. The pupil. In: Davson H, ed. The Eye, 2nd ed, vol 3. New York: Academic Press, 1969: 255-327.
11. De Groot SG, Gebhard JW. Pupil size as determined by adapting luminance. J Opt Soc Am 1952;42:492-5.
12. Schäfer R, Weale R. The influence of age and retinal illumination on the pupillary near reflex. Vision Res 1970;10:179-91.
13. Erickson P, Robboy M. Performance characteristics of a hydrophilic concentric bifocal contact lens. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:702-8.
14. Woods RL, Saunders JE, Port MJ. Concentric-design rigid bifocal lenses, part II: visual performance. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1993;16:25-36.
15. Walsh G. The effect of mydriasis on the pupillary centration of the human eye. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988;8:178-82.
16. Wilson MA, Campbell MCW, Simonet P. Change of pupil centration with change of illumination and pupil size. Optom Vis Sci 1991;2:129-36.
17. Mandell RB. Contact lens practice. 4th ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1988:785-823.
18. Borish IM, Perrigin D. Relative movement of lower lid and line of sight from distant to near fixation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:881-7.
19. Guillon M. Basic contact lens fitting. In: Ruben M, Guillon M, eds. Contact Lens Practice. London: Chapman & Hall Medical, 1994:587-622.
20. CIE Technical Committee 3.1. An analytic model for describing the influence of lighting parameters upon visual performance vol. II: summary and application guidelines. Publication CIE no19/2.2. Paris: Bureau Central de la CIE, 1981: 60-4.
21. Back AP, Holden BA, Hine NA. Correction of presbyopia with contact lenses: comparative success rates with three systems. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:518-25.
22. Smith G. Schematic eyes: history, description and applications. Clin Exp Optom 1995;78:176-89.
23. Stiles WS, Crawford BH. The luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 1933;112:428-50.
24. Applegate RA, Lakshminarayanan V. Normal variation in the Stiles Crawford effect peak location and rho values. OSA Technical Digest series 1993;3:80-3.