Impact of forest management history on the state of forests in relation to natural forest succession: Comparative study, North Karelia, Finland vs. Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 83, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 71-85

  Uuttera, Janne ^a   Maltamo, Matti ^b   Kuusela, Kullervo ^a  

^a EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forest management; Potential biodiversity; Stand structure

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; FOREST; MANAGEMENT; STAND STRUCTURE; SUCCESSION;

FINLAND; KARELIA; NORTH KARELIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 0030439929     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03698-9     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Brown, V.K., 1986. Life cycle strategies and plant succession. In: Taylor, F. and Karban, R. (Editors). The Evolution of Insect Life Cycles. Springer-Verlag, NY, pp. 105-124.
2. Cajander, A.K. 1926. The theory of forest types. Acta For. Fenn., 29 (3): 1-108.
3. Cajander, A.K., 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta For. Fenn., 56 (5): 1-71.
4. Camp, O., 1994. Critical elements of forest sustainability. Int. J. Ecoforest., 10 (1): 7-10.
5. Cao, Q.V. and Burkhardt, H.E., 1984. A segmented approach for modeling diameter frequency data. For. Sci., 30: 129-137.
6. Droessler, T.D. and Burk, T.E., 1989. A test of nonparametric smoothing of diameter distributions. Scand. J. For. Res., 4: 407-415.
7. Franklin, J.F., 1993. The fundamentals of ecosystem management with applications in the Pacific northwest. In: G.H. Aplet, J.T. Olson, N. Johnson and V.A. Sample (Editors). Defining sustainable forestry. Island Press, Washington, DC.
8. Frey, T.E.A., 1978. The Finnish School and Forest-Site Types. In: R.H. Whittaker (Editor). Classification of Plant Communities. The Hague: 81-110.
9. Global biodiversity strategy: guidelines for action to save, study, and use earth's biotic wealth sustainably and equitably. 1992. World Resource Institute (WRI), The World Conservation Union (IUCN), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
10. Horn, H.S., 1974. The ecology of secondary succession. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 5: 25-37.
11. Huston, M.A., 1994. Biological Diversity. The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
12. Ilvessalo, Y., 1922. Vegetationsstatische Untersuchungen über die Waldtypen. Acta For. Fenn., 20: 1-73. (in German).
13. Kalela, A., 1961. Waldvegetationszonen Finnlands und ihre klimatischen paralleltypen. Arch. Soc. Vanamo, 16: 65-83. (in German).
14. Kuusela, K., 1966. A Basal Area - Mean Tree Method in Forest Inventory. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn., 61.
15. Kuusela, K., 1990. The dynamics of boreal coniferous forests. SITRA, Helsinki, 168 pp.
16. Larsson, T.-B., 1992. Mål för naturvården. En strategi för bevarande av den biologiska mångfalden. Rapport 3986. Naturvårdsvärket, 128 pp. (in Swedish).
17. Lindholm, T. and Tuominen, S., 1993. Metsien puuston luonnontilaisuuden arviointi. [The evaluation of the naturalness of the stocking of forest stand]. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja n:o A:3. Metsähallitus [Finnish Forestry Board], Vantaa. (in Finnish).
18. Lindholm, T. and Vasander, H., 1987. Vegetation and stand development of mesic forest after prescribed burning. Silva Fenn., 21: 259-278..
19. Malmer, N., Lingren, L. and Persson, S., 1978. Vegetational succession in a South-Swedish deciduous wood. Vegetatio, 36: 17-29.
20. Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L., 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biol. Conserv., 43: 63-76.
21. Metsäntutkimuslaitos, 1989. Valtakunnan metsien 8. inventointi. Kenttätyön ohjeet. Pohjois-Karjalan versio. [Finnish Forest Research Institute. 8th National Forest Inventory. Field instructions], 96 pp. (in Finnish).
22. Metsäntutkimuslaitos, 1991. Ladenson metsien inventointi. Kenttätyön ohjeet. [Finnish Forest Resource Institute. The Inventory of Ladenso forests. Field instructions], 77 pp. (in Finnish).
23. Metsäntutkimuslaitos, 1992. Metsätilastollinen vuosikirja 1990-1991. Yearbook of forest statistics 1990-1991. Folia For. 790: 281 pp. (in Finnish with English summary).
24. Mikola, P., 1982. Application of vegetation science to forestry in Finland. In: G. Jahn (Editor). Application of Vegetation Science to Forestry. The Hague, pp. 199-244.
25. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Helsinki, 1993. Sound Forestry - Svistainable Development. Conference Proceedings, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Helsinki, 161 pp.
26. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Helsinki. 1993. Sound Forestry - Sustainable Development, Report on the follow-up of the Strasbourg Resolutions of the Ministerial Conference, 1990, 201 pp.
27. Mladenoff, D.J. and Pastor, J. 1993. Sustainable forest ecosystems in the northern hardwood and conifer region: concepts and management. In: G.H. Aplet, J.T. Olson, N. Johnson and V.A. Sample (Editors). Defining Sustainable Forestry. Island Press, Washington, DC.
28. Myllynen, A.-L. and Saastamoinen, O., 1995. Karjaian tasavallan metsätalous [Forestry in the Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation]. Silva Carelica, 29: 210 pp. (in Finnish).
29. Päivinen, R., 1980. On the estimation of stem diameter distribution and stand characteristics. Folia For., 442: 28 pp. (in Finnish with English summary).
30. Shafi, M.I. and Yarranton, G.A., 1973. Diversity, floristic richness, and species eveness during a secondary (postfire) succession. Ecology, 54: 897-902.
31. Silverman, B.W., 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, 175 pp.
32. Solbrig, O.T., 1991a. Biodiversity, Scientific issues and collaborative research proposals. Man and Biosphere Digest 9, UNESCO, Paris.
33. Solbrig, O.T., 1991b. From genes to ecosystems: a research agenda for biodiversity. International Union of Biological Sciences, Paris.
34. Sukatšev, V., 1960. Metsätyyppien tutkimisen opas. Suomentanut Erkki Laitakari. [Guide to determine forest types. Translated by Erkki Laitakari]. Silva Fenn., 99: 181 pp. (in Finnish with English summary).
35. Toivonen, H. and Leivo, A., 1993. Kasvillisuuskartoituksessa käytettävä kasvillisuus - ja kasvupaikkaluokitus. Kokeiluversio. [Vegetation and habitat classification in the Finnish vegetation mapping. Draft version]. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja A: 14, 96 pp. (in Finnish with English summary).
36. Tonteri, T., 1994. Species richness of boreal understorey forest vegetation in relation to site type and successional factors. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 31: 53-60.
37. Tonteri, T., Hotanen, J.-P. and Kuusipalo, J., 1990. The Finnish forest site type approach: ordination and classification studies of mesic forest sites in southern Finland. Vegetatio, 87: 85-98.
38. Uuttera, J. and Maltamo, M., 1995. Impact of regeneration method on forest structure prior to first thinning. Silva Fenn., 29(4): in press.
39. Virkkala, R., Rajasärkkä, A., Väisänen, R.A., Vickholm, M. and Virolainen, E., 1994. Conservation value of nature reserves: do hole-nesting birds prefer protected forests in southern Finland? Ann. Zool. Fenn., 31: 173-186.
40. Wilson, E.O., 1988. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 521 pp.
41. Wilson, E.O., 1992. The diversity of life. Harvard University Press, MA.
42. Zackrisson, O., 1977. Influence of forest fires on the North Swedish boreal forest. Oikos, 29: 22-32.
43. Zackrisson, O., 1992. Boreal forest ecosystems in Western Europe. A past-present-future perspective focusing on biodiversity in Swedish forests. Boreal forests of the World. Abstract and Proceedings of an International Scientific Meeting, 30 September-2 October 1992, Jokkmokk, Sweden. Taiga Rescue Network: 3-5.
44. Zopel, M., 1989. Secondary forest succession in Järviselja, South-Eastern Estonia: changes in field layer vegetation. Ann. Bot. Fenn., 26: 171-182.