Long-term renal morphology and function following enterocystoplasty (refluxing or anti-reflux anastomosis): An experimental study

British Journal of Urology

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 840-846

  Kristjansson, A ^a,d   Abol Enein, H ^a,b   Alm, P ^a,b,c   Mokhtar, A A ^a,b   Ghoneim, M A ^a,b   Mansson W ^a  

^a Departmentof Urology   (Sweden)

^b Departmentof Pathology   (Sweden)

^c MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Asymptomatic bacteriuria; Enterocystoplasty; Glomerular filtration rate; Nephropathy; Reflux and anti reflux ureteric implantation

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIURIA; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOMETRY; DOG; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; IMPLANTATION; INTESTINE ANASTOMOSIS; NONHUMAN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELONEPHRITIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE CULTURE; UROLOGIC SURGERY; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX;

EID: 0030438219     PISSN: 00071331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.02376.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ransley PC. Risdon RA. Reflux and renal scarring. Kr I Radial 1978: 14 (suppl): 1-35
2. Hodson C], Mailing TMJ. McManamon PJ, Lewis MC,. The pathogenesis of reflux nephropalhy (chronic atrophie pyelonephritis). Br J Radial 1975: 15 (suppl): 1-26
3. Duggan FJ. Sanford EJ. Rohner TJ. The disadvantages of reflux in uretero-ileal cutaneous anastomoses for supravesical urinary diversion. Ural Res 1974: 2: 85-90
4. Richie JP. Skinner DO, Waisman J. The effect of reflux on (he development of pyelonephritis in urinary diversion: an experimental study. J Surg Res 1974: 16: 256-61
5. Helal M. Pow-Sang J, Sanford F., Figueroa E, Lockhart J . Direct (nontunneled) ureterocolonic reimplantion in association with continent reservoirs. J Urol 1993: 150: 835-7
6. Bejany 1). Suarez 0. Penalver M, Polilano V. Nonlunnelecl ureterocolonic anastomosis: an alternate to the tunneled implantation. J Urol 1989: 142: 961-3
7. Studer UK. Spiegel T. Casanova GA et al. Heal bladder substitute: antireflux nipple or afferent tubular segment? Eur Urol 1991: 20: 315-26
8. Goodwill WE. Winter CC. Barker WE. 'Cup-Patch' technique of ileocysloplasty for bladder enlargement or partial substitution. Surg Gyn Obst 1959: Feb: 240-4
9. Abol-Enein H. Ghoneim MA. A novel uretero-ileal reimplantion technique: the serous lined extramural tunnel. A preliminary report. J Urol 1994: 151: 1193-7
10. Schwartz GR. J effs RD. Heal conduit urinary diversion in children: computer analysis of follow-up from 2 to 16 years. J Ural 1975; 114: 285-8
11. Bergman B. Kaijser B. Nilson AH. Conduit urinary diversion and urinary tract infection. 1. Serum antibody tilers against Uscliericlna coli and Protcits mirabilis in relation to urographical Undings. Scand J U ml Scphrol 1979: 1 3: 65-9
12. James RE. Canham JR. Stowe NT. Novick AC. Levin HS. Straffon RA. The effect of sterile ureteral reflux on intact and diverted upper urinary tracts. Invest Ural 1981: 19: 43-5
13. 3 Lenaghan D. Cass AS. Cusscn LJ. Stephens FD. Long-term effect of vesicoureteral reflux on the upper urinary tract of dogs: II. With urethral obstruction. J Ural 1972: 107: 758-61
14. Studer UE, Ackerman D. Casanova GA, Zingg EJ. Three years' experience with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute. Br J Ural 1989: 63: 43-52
15. Christie BA. Incidence and etiology of vesicoureteral reflux in apparently normal dogs. Invest Ural 1971: 9: 184-94
16. Sommer JL. Roberts JA. Ureteral reflux resulting from chronic urinary infection in dogs: long-term studies. J Urol 1966: 95: 502-5
17. St Clair SR. Hixon CJ. Ritchey ML. Enterocystoplasty and reflux nephropathy in the canine model. J Urol 1992: 148: 728-32
18. Ross G Jr, Thompson IM. The relationship of nonobstructive reflux and chronic pyelonephritis: an experimental study. J Urol 1963; 90: 391-4
19. Kristjänsson A. Wallin L. Mänsson W. Renal function up to 16 years after conduit (refluxing or antireflux anastomosis) or continent urinary diversion. I. Glomerular filtration rate and patency of ureterointestinal anastomosis. Br J Urol 1995: 76: 539-45
20. Kock NG, Nilson AE, Norlén L. Sundin T. Trasti H. Changes in renal parenchyma and the upper urinary tracts following urinary diversion via a continent ileum reservoir. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1979; 49 (suppl): 11-22
21. Mänsson W. Colleen S, Wullt, B. Microbial ecology in urinary tracts reconstructed with intestinal segments: factors influencing bacterial invasion, attachment and growth. In Webster G. Goldwasser B eds. Urinary Diversion: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice. Oxford: ISIS Medical Media. 1995: 53-63
22. Hill MJ, Hudson MJ, Stewart M. The urinary bacterial flora in patients with three types of urinary tract diversion. ; Med Microbiol 1983; 16: 221-6
23. Mânsson W. Colleen S, Mârdh P-A. The microbial flora of the continent cecal urinary reservoir, its stoma and peristomal skin. J Uml 1986: 135: 247-50
24. Akerlund S. Campanello M, Kaijser B, jonsson 0. Bacteriuria in patients with a continent ileal reservoir for urinary diversion does not regularly require antibiotic treatment. Br I Urol 1994: 74: 177-81
25. Paiss T. Gschwend J. Gottfried W. Hautmann RE. Die Signifikanz der Bakteriuria bei der Ileum-Neoblase. Der Urologe 1995: Suppl 1: S49
26. Kristjânsson A. Bajc M. Wallin L. Willner J. Mânsson W. Renal function up to 16 years after conduit (relluxing or antirefluxing anastomosis) or continent urinary diversion. 2. Renal scarring and location of bacteriuria. Br J Urol 1995: 76: 546-50
27. Gotoh M, Yoshikawa Y, Sahashi M et al. Urodynamic study of storage and evacuation of urine in patients with a ureteral Kock pouch. J Urol 1995; 154: 1850-3