Motion-onset visual evoked potentials improve the diagnosis of glaucoma

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 211-221

  Kubová, Zuzana ^a   Kuba, Miroslav ^a   Hrochová, Jana ^a   Svěrák, Jaroslav ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

glaucoma; human magnocellular pathway; motion onset VEPs; pattern reversal VEPs; visual evoked potentials (VEPs)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; COLOR PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0030436809     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02583292     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibres. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 357-63.
2. Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR, L'Hernaut NL, Baginski TA. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibres. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 28: 913-20.
3. Livingstone M, Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: anatomy, physiology and perception. Science 1988; 240: 740-9.
4. Fitzke FW, Poinoosawmy D, Nagassubramanian S, Hitchings RA. Peripheral displacement thresholds in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. In: Heil A, ed. Perimetric update. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini Publications, 1989: 399-452.
5. Silverman SE, Trick GL, Hart WM. Motion perception is abnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 722-9.
6. Joffe KM, Raymond JE, Crichton A. Motion perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 1103.
7. Bullimore MA, Wood JM, Swenson K. Motion perception in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 3526-33.
8. Kubová Z, Kuba M, Spekreijse H, Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res 1995; 35: 197-205.
9. Kuba M, Kubová Z. Visual evoked potentials specific for motion-onset. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 80: 83-9.
10. Kuba M, Toyonaga N, Kubová Z. Motion-reversal visual evoked responses. Physiol Res 1992; 41: 369-73.
11. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Committee on Vision. Report of Working Group 39: recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Adv Ophthalmol 1980; 41: 103-48.
12. Towle VL, Moskowitz A, Sokol S, Schwartz B. The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 175-83.
13. Göpfert E, Schlykowa L, Müller R. Zur topographie des Bewegungs-VEP am Menschen. ZEBG-BMG 1988; 19: 14-8.
14. Sokol S, Domar A, Moskowitz A, Schwartz. H. Pattern evoked potential latency and contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1981; 27: 79-86.
15. Howe JW, Mitchell KW. Simultaneous recording of pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked cortical potential in group of patients with glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1984; 40: 101-7.
16. Howe JW, Mitchell KW. Visual evoked cortical potential to paracentral retinal stimulation in chronic glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and an age-matched group of normals. Doc Ophthalmol 1986; 63: 37-44.
17. Fernández-Tirado FJ, Ucles P, Pablo L, Honrubia FM. Electrophysiological methods in early glaucoma detection. Acta Ophthalmol 1994; 72: 168-74.
18. Regan D. Steady-state evoked potentials. J Opt Soc Am 1977; 67: 1475-89.
19. Tobimatsu S, Tashima-Kurita S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu M, Kato M. Clinical relevance of phase of steady-state VEPs to P100 latency of transient VEPs. EIectroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80: 89-93.
20. Strasburger H. The analysis of steady-state evoked potentials revisited. Clin Vision Sci 1987; 1: 245-56.
21. Bray LCH, Mitchell KW, Howe JH, Gashau A. Visual function in glaucoma: a comparative evaluation of computerised static perimetry and the pattern visual evoked potential. Clin Vision Sci 1992; 7: 21-9.
22. Baez KA, McNaught AI, Dowler JGF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchins RA. Motion detection threshold and field progression in normal tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 125-8.
23. Kubová Z, Kuba M, Juran J, Blakemore C. Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses. Vision Res 1996; 36: 181-90.
24. Kubová Z, Kuba M. Clinical application of motion-onset visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 81: 209-18.