Geometrical modelling of soil bidirectional reflectance incorporating specular effects

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 17, Issue 18, 1996, Pages 3691-3704

  Cierniewski, J ^a   Baret, F ^b   Verbrugghe, M ^b   Hanocq, J F ^b   Jacquemoud, S ^c  

^a ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLAY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ACQUISITION; LIGHT REFLECTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); SAND;

NEAR INFRARED RADIATION; SOIL BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE;

SOILS;

GEOMETRY; REFLECTANCE; SOIL SURFACE;

EID: 0030435814     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431169608949178     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brennan, B. and Bandeen, W. R., 1970, Anisotropic reflectance characteristics of natural Earth surfaces. Applied Optics, 9, 404-412.
2. Bartlett, D. S., Johnson, M. A, and Klemas, V., 1986, Assessing impacts of off-nadir observation on remote sensing of vegetation: use of the Suits model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1, 247-264.
3. Cierniewski, J., 1987, A model for soil surface roughness influence on the spectral response of bare soils in the visible and near-infrared range. Remote Sensing of Environment, 123, 97-115.
4. Cierniewski, J., 1989, The influence of the viewing geometry of bare rough soil surfaces on their spectral response in the visible and near-infrared range. Remote Sensing of Environment, 127, 135-142.
5. Cierniewski, J. and Verbrugghe, M., 1994, A geometrical model of soil bidirectional reflectance in the visible and near-infrared range. Sixth International Symposium on Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing, Actes Proceedings Val d'Isere, France, 17-21 January, 1994, edited by International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Commission VII, Working Group 1), pp. 635-642.
6. Cooper, K. D. and Smith, J. A., 1985, A Monte Carlo reflectance model for soil surfaces with three-dimensional structure. I.E.E.E. Transations on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 23, 668-673.
7. Curran, P. J., 1985, Earth surface interaction with electro-magnetic radiation. In Principles of Remote Sensing (London and New York: Longman)
8. Deering, D. W., Eck, T. F. and Otterman, J., 1990, Bidirectional reflectances of selected desert surfaces and their three-parameter soil characterization. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 52, 71-93.
9. Eaton, F. D. and Dirmhirn, L, 1990, Reflected irradiances of natural surfaces and their effect on albedo. Applied Optics, 18, 994-1003.
10. Foody, G. M., 1988, The effects of viewing geometry on image classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9, 1909-1915.
11. Graetz, R. D. and Gentle, M. R., 1982, A study of the relationship between reflectance characterislics in the Landsat wavebands and the composition and structure of an Australian semi-arid rangeland. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 148, 1721-1736.
12. Hapke, B., 1981, Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy 1. Theory. Journal of Geophysical Research, 86, 3039-3054.
13. Hapke, B., 1984, Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy 3. Correction for macroscopic roughness. Icarus, 59, 41-59.
14. Hapke, B., 1986, Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy 4. The extinction coefficient and the opposition effect. Icarus, 67, 264-280.
15. Huete, A. R., 1987, Soil and sun angle interactions on partial canopy spectra. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 1307-1317.
16. Irons, J. R., Campbell, G. S., Norman, J. M., Graham, D. W, and Kovalick, W. M., 1992, Prediction and measurement of soil bidirectional reflectance. I.E.E.E. Transations on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30, 249-260.
17. Jacquemoud, S., Baret, F. and Hanocq, J. F., 1992, Modelling spectral and bidirectional soil reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 41, 123-132.
18. ICimes, D. S. and Sellers, P. J., 1985, Inferring hemispherical reflectance of the Earth’s surface for global energy budget from remotely sensed nadir or directional radiance values. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 205-223.
19. Kriebel, K. T., 1976, On the variability of the reflected radiation field due to differing distributions of the radiation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 4, 57-264.
20. Milton, E. J. and Webb, J. P., 1987, Ground radiometry and airborne multispectral survey of bare soils. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 3-14.
21. Norman, J. M., Welles, J. M. and Walter, E. A., 1985, Contrast among bidirectional reflectance of eaves, canopies, and soils. I.E.E.E. Transations on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 23, 659-667.
22. Ott, W„ Pfeiffer, B, and Quiel, F., 1984, Directional reflectance properties determined by analysis of airborne multispectral scanner data and atmospheric correction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 116, 7-54.
23. Pech, R. P., Graetz, R. R. and Davis, A. W., 1986, Reflectance modelling and the derivation of vegetation indices for an Australian semi-arid shrubland. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, 389-403.