Tracking toxics: Chemical use and the public's “right-to-know”

Environment

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 4-34

  Hearne, Shelley A ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT; INCINERATION; INDUSTRY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; POLLUTION; RECYCLING; UNITED STATES; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; LEGISLATIVE IMPACT; TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY;

USA;

EID: 0030431472     PISSN: 00139157     EISSN: 19399154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00139157.1996.9929269     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. P. Hill,. National Institute tor Chemical Studies, personal communication with the author. 8 May 1996.
2. P. Orum. coordinator. Working Croup on Community Right-To-Know, personal communication with the author. 6 March 1998
3. W. Muir, research director. INFORM, and president, Hampshire Research.Associates, Alexandria. Va. personal communication with the author. 28 August 1993.
4. R. Gottlieb, ed. Reducing Toxics: A New Approach to Policy and Industrial Decisionmaking (Washington, DC.: Island Press, 1995). 133 -35.
5. Office of Pollution Prevention. Environmental Protection Agency, Pollution Prevention 1991: Progress on Reducing Industrial Pollutants. EPA ZIP- 3003 (Washington. D.C., October 1991)
6. P. Orum. ed. Making the Difference: Part I (Washington. D.C.: Working Group on Community Right-to- Know. February 1990) Guidelines. Q&A (Washington. D C., May 1994), 1.
7. D. Lobcr ct al. "Corporate Environmental Reports: An Evolving Management Tool" (working paper for Duke University, Durham. N.C., 1996).
8. T. Naten. associate. Hampshire Research Associates. personal communication with the author. 3 March 1W.
9. G. V. Poje and D. Horowitz. Phantom Reductions: Tracking Toxic Trends (Washington. DC.: National Wildlife Federation. August 1990)
10. Citizens Fund. Manufacturing Pollution: A Survey of the Notion's Toxic Polluters (Washington. DC. July 1991)
11. Citizens Fund. Manufacturing Pollution (Washington. D.C., August 1992)
12. J. B. Courteau and N. Lilien- thiil. Toward a More Informed Public: Recommendations for Improving the Toxics Release Inventory (New York: INFORM. 1991).
13. G. Riley, J. Warren, and R. Baker. Assessment of Changes in Reported TRI Releases and Transfers Between 1989 and 1990. FPA Contract Number CRH!760-01-0 (Research Triangle Park. N.C.: Center for Economics Research. Research Triangle Institute. May 1993).
14. R. A. Frosch. "Industrial Ecology: Adapting Technology for a Sustainable World." Environment. December 1995. 16.
15. H. Sheevers et al. A Clearer I'iw of Toxics: New Jersey's. Reporting Requirements as a Model (or the United States (New York INFORM. 1994).
16. S. A. Hearne. “Potential Modifications to the US EPA Toxics Release Inventory to Belter Assess Pollution Prevention." (Ph-D. diss. Columbia University. New York, May 1994)
17. S. Hearne and M Aucotl. "Source Reduction vs. Release Reduction: Why the TRI Cannot Measure Pollution Prevention." Pollution Prevention Review. Winter 1991/1992.
18. L. Greer, E. Clarence Smith and J. Warren. Going to the Source: A Case Study on Source Reduction of Industrial Toxic Waste New York: Natural Resources Defense Council. 1991).
19. A. White et al. New Jersey's Planning Process- Shaping a New Vision of Pollution Prevention. Case Study No. Sondo: Phannaceuticals (Boston. Mass.: Tellus Institute. December 1995).
20. T. Greiner, president. Greiner Environmental, personal communication with the author. 24 January 1996