Phenotypic selection on plant height in a segregating hybrid population of Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae)

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 157, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 488-492

  Andersson, Stefan ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTERACEAE; CREPIS; CREPIS TECTORUM; CREPIS TECTORUM PUMILA;

FLOWERING RATE; HERBIVORE DAMAGE; PHENOTYPIC SELECTION; PLANT HEIGHT; SEGREGATING HYBRID POPULATION;

EID: 0030428890     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/297366     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andersson S 1988 Limiting factors on seed production in Crepis tectorum ssp. pumila. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 76:9-20.
2. _ 1989 Life-history variation in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Oecologia 80:540-545.
3. _ 1990 A phenetic study of Crepis tectorum in Fennoscandia and Estonia. Nord J Bot 9:589-600.
4. _ 1991 Quantitative genetic variation in a population of Crepis tectorum subsp. pumila (Asteraceae). Biol J Linn Soc 44:381-393.
5. _ 1992 Phenotypic selection in a natural population of Crepis tectorum subsp. pumila (Asteraceae). Can J Bot 70:89-95.
6. _ 1993 Morphometric differentiation, patterns of interfertility, and the genetic basis of character evolution in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 184:27-40.
7. _ 1996 Seed size as a determinant of germination rate in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): evidence from a seed burial experiment. Can J Bot 74:568-572.
8. Andersson S, RG Shaw 1994 Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): genetic correlations across light regimens. Heredity 72:113-125.
9. Andersson S, B Widén 1993 Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits in a synthetic population of Senecio integrifolius (Asteraceae). Oikos 66:72-79.
10. Babcock EB 1947 The genus Crepis. University of California Press, Berkeley. 1030 pp.
11. Bengtsson K, HC Prentice, E Rosén, R Moberg, E Sjögren 1988 The dry alvar grasslands of Öland: ecological amplitudes of plant species in relation to vegetation composition. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 76:21-46.
12. Bennington CC, JB McGraw 1995 Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecol Monogr 65:303-323.
13. Clausen J, DD Keck, WM Hiesey 1940 Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. The effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst Washington Publ 520. 450 pp.
14. Cronquist A 1969 On the relationship between taxonomy and evolution. Taxon 18:177-187.
15. Davis JI, AJ Gilmartin 1985 Morphological variation and speciation. Syst Bot 10:417-425.
16. Ehrlén J 1995 Demography of the perennial herb, Lathyrus vernus L. I. Herbivory and individual performance. J Ecol 83:287-295.
17. Endler JA 1986 Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
18. Gould SJ 1980 Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6:119-130.
19. Heslop-Harrison J 1964 Forty years of genecology. Adv Ecol Res 2:159-247.
20. Johnston MO 1991 Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45:1468-1479.
21. Jordan N 1991 Multivariate analysis of selection in experimental populations derived from hybridization of two ecotypes of the annual plant Diodia teres W. (Rubiaceae). Evolution 45:1760-1772.
22. Lande R, SJ Arnold 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
23. Lotz LAP 1990 The relation between age and size at first flowering of Plantago major in various habitats. J Ecol 78:757-771.
24. Miller TE 1987 Effects of emergence time on survival and growth in an early old-field plant community. Oecologia 72:272-278.
25. Mitchell-Olds T, RG Shaw 1987 Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149-1161.
26. Neuffer B, S Bartelheim 1989 Genecology of Capsella bursa-pastoris from an altitudinal transect in the Alps. Oecologia 80:521-527.
27. Peakall R, SN Handel 1993 Pollinators discriminate among floral heights of a sexually deceptive orchid: implications for selection. Evolution 47:1681-1687.
28. Pettersson B 1958 Dynamik och konstans i Gotlands flora och vegetation. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 40:1-288.
29. Primack RB, H Kang 1989 Measuring fitness and natural selection in wild plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:367-396.
30. Scheiner SM 1989 Variable selection along a successional gradient. Evolution 43:548-562.
31. Stanley SM 1979 Macroevolution: pattern and process. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
32. Steinberg D 1988 LOGIT: a supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, Ill.
33. Turesson G 1922 The genotypic response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3:211-350.
34. Van Tienderen P, J Van der Toorn 1991 Genetic differentiation between populations of Plantago lanceolata. II. Phenotypic selection in a transplant experiment in three contrasting habitats. J Ecol 79: 43-59.
35. Verbeek NAM, R Boasson 1995 Flowering height and postfloral elongation in 13 species of angiosperms. Can J Bot 73:723-727.
36. Waisel Y 1959 Ecotypic variation in Nigella arvensis L. Evolution 13:469-475.
37. Warwick SI, D Briggs 1979 The genecology of lawn weeds. III. Cultivation experiments with Achillea millefolium L., Bellis perennis L., Plantago lanceolata L., Plantago major L. and Prunella vulgaris L. collected from lawns and contrasting grassland habitats. New Phytol 83:509-536.
38. Witte H 1906 Till de svenska alfvarväxternas ekologi. PhD diss. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
39. Wolff K 1988 Genetic analysis of ecological relevant morphological variability in Plantago lanceolata L. 3. Natural selection in an F2 population. Theor Appl Genet 75:772-778.