Studies on apple bruising: I. Estimation of incidence and susceptibility differences in the bruising of three apple cultivars

Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 209-213

  Ericsson, N A ^a   Tahir, I I ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Aroma; Bruise weight; Cox's Orange Pippin; Ingrid Marie; Percentage

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 0030426689     PISSN: 09064710     EISSN: 16511913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09064719609410951     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Brusewitz, G. H., McCollum, T. G., and Zhang, X., 1991. Impact bruise resistance of peaches. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 34:962–965.
2. Ericsson, N.-A., 1989. Possibilities for reduction of mechanical damages during distribution of apples. DGQ-XXIV, 13–14. 126–136. Vortragstagunta Qualitätsaspekte Von Obst Und Gemüse. März 1989, E.V.
3. Klein, J. D., 1987. Relationships of harvest date, storage conditions and fruit characteristics to bruise susceptibility of apples. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 112 (1):113–118.
4. Maness, N. O., Brusewitz, G. H., and McCollum, T. G., 1992. Impact bruise resistance comparison among peach cultivars. Hortscience, 27 (9):1008–1011.
5. Pictian Chen & Zongnan Sun. 1981. Impact parameters in relation to bruise injury in apples. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. Pap., 81:3041
6. Schoorl, D., and Holt, J. E., 1977. The effect of storage time and temperature on the bruising of Jonathan, Delicious and Granny Smith apples. J. Text. Stud., 8:409–416.
7. Topping, A. J., and Luton, M. T., 1986. Cultivar differences in the bruising of English apples. J. Hort. Sci., 61 (1):9–13.
8. Tsukamoto, M., 1981. Studies on the mechanical injury of fruit. 2. Susceptibility to impact and compression in apple fruit as related to storage periods and fruit portions. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci., 49 (4):571–575.