Introducing patient values into the decision making process for breast cancer screening

Women and Health

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 47-67

  Pellissier, James M ^a   Venta, Enrique R ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MODEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UNITED STATES;

AUTONOMY; BREAST CANCER; DECISION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALES; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; UNITED STATES; VALUES;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GUIDELINES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATERNALISM; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIAL VALUES; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 0030425903     PISSN: 03630242     EISSN: 15410331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J013v24n04_03     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Silverberg E, Boring CC, and Squires TS: Cancer statistics 1990. CA Cancer J. Clin. 1990; 40:9-26.
2. Cribb A, Haran D: The benefits and ethics of screening for breast cancer. Public Health 1991; 105(1):63-67.
3. Haus AG, Feig SA, Ehrlich SM et al: Mammography screening: Technology, radiation dose and risk, quality control and benefits to society. Radiology 1990; 174:627-656.
4. Roberts MM: Breast Screening: Time for a Rethink? Br. Med. J. 1989; 229:1153-1155.
5. Miller AB: Breast cancer screening: Who should be included? J. Gen Intern. Med. 1990; 5(5 suppl.):S 19-22
6. Miller A, Baines C, To T et al: Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40-49 years. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1992; 147(10): 1459-1476.
7. de Honing HJ, van Ineveld BM, van Oortmarsen GJ et al: Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness: Uncertain factors, Int. J. Cancer 1991; 49(4):531-537.
8. Miller AB: Is routine mammography screening appropriate for women 40-49 years of age? Am. J. Prev. Med. 1991; 7(l): 55-62.
9. Kerlikoske H, Grady D, and Emster VL: Efficacy of Screening Mammography: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA 1995; 273:149-154.
10. de Honing HJ, van Ineveld BM, de Haas JC et al: Advanced breast cancer and its prevention by screening. Br. J. Cancer 1992; 65(6):950-955.
11. Rakowski W, Dube CE, Marcus BH et al: Assessing elements of women’s decisions about mammography, Health Psychol. 1992; 11 (2): 111-118.
12. Brock DW: The ideal of shared decision making between physicians and patients. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1991; 1 (1 ):28-47.
13. Veatch RM: Models for Ethical Medicine in a Revolutionary Age. Hast-ings Center Report 1972; 2:5-7.
14. Bayles M: Physicians as Body Mechanics, in Contemporary Issues in Biomedical Ethics, ed. John W. Davis, Barry Hoffmaster, and Susan Shorten, Clif-ton, NJ, Humana Press.
15. Beyth-Marom R: How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Forecasting 1982; 1:257-269.
16. Aaronson NK, Meyrowitz BE, Bard M et al: Quality of life research in oncology. Past achievements and future priorities. Cancer 1991; 67:839-843.
17. Aaronson NK: Methodologic in assessing the quality of life of cancer pa-tients. Cancer 1991; 67:844-850.
18. Bloom JR: Quality of life after cancer. A policy perspective. Cancer 1991; 67:855-859.
19. de Haes JZ, de Koning HJ, van Oortmarssen GJ et al: The impact of a breast cancer screening programme onquality-adjusted life-years. Int. J. Cancer 1991; 49(4):538-544.
20. Eddy DM: Anatomy of a decision. JAMA 1990; 263(3):441-443.
21. Eddy DM: Connecting value and costs: Whom do we ask and what do we ask them? JAMA 1990; 264(13): 1737-1739.
22. Busschbach JJV, Hessing DJ, and de Charro FT: The utility of health at dif¬ferent stages of life: A quantitative approach. Soc. Sci. Med. 1993; 37(2): 153-158.
23. Giaque WC and Peebles TC: Application of multidimensional utility theory in determining optimal test-treatment strategies for streptococcal sore throat and rheumatic fever. Operations Research 1976; 24(5):933-950.
24. Mandelblatt JS, Wheat ME, Monane M et al: Breast cancer screening for elderly women with and without comorbid conditions: A decision analysis model. Annals of Internal Medicine 1992; 116:722-730.
25. LaPuma J and Lawlor EF: Quality-adjusted life years. Ethical implications for physicians and policy makers. JAMA 1990; 263:2917-2921.
26. Nelson EC and Berwick DM: The measurement of health status in clinical practice. Med. Care 1989; 27:S77-90.
27. Mulley AG: Assessing patients’ utilities. Can the ends justify the means? Med. Care 1989; 27:8269-281.
28. Keynes JM: The Application of Probability to Conduct. Reprinted in New-man J. ed: The World of Mathematics, p. 1360. New York: Basic Books, 1956.
29. Alberts DA: Decision Theory in Medicine: A review and critique. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 1978; 56(3):362-401.
30. Dawes RM and Corrigan B: Linear models in decision making. Psycholog-ical Bulletin 1974; 81(2):95-106.
31. Howard RA: Decision Analysis: Practice and promise. Management Sci-ence 1988; 34(6):679-695.
32. Von Neumann J and Morgenstem O: Theory of Games and Economic Be-havior. Second Edition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947.
33. Ledley RS and Lusted LB: Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. Science 1959; 130(3366):9.
34. Ledley RS and Lusted LB: Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. Science 1959; 130(3366):9.
35. McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, and Pauker SG: Speech and survival. New England Journal of Medicine 1981; 305:982-987.
36. Plisken JS, Shcpard DS, and Weinstein MC: Utility functions for life years and health status. Operations Research 1980; 28:206-224
37. Pellissier JM and Hazen GB: lmplementation of continuous-risk utility assessment: The total hip replacement decision. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 1994; 28:E 1-276.
38. Card WI, Rusinkiewicz M, and Phillips C1: Utility estimation of a set of states of health. Methods of Information in Medicine 1977; 16(3): 168-1 75
39. O’Brian B and Rushby J: Outcome assessment in cardiovascular costbenefit studies. American Heart Journal 1990; 119(3):740-747
40. Hazen GB, Hopp WJ, and Pellissier JM: Continuous risk utility assessment for medical decision making. Medical Decision Making 1991; 1 1(4):294-304.