The implications of transference and parallel process for the frame of supervision: A historical perspective

Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 485-497

  Perlman, Stuart D ^a,b,c  

^a AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOANALYSIS   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; HISTORY; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; REVIEW; TRAINING; TRANSFERENCE;

EID: 0030425548     PISSN: 00903604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/jaap.1.1996.24.3.485     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Bibring, E. (1937), Discussion on "methods and technique of control analysis (a part of the report of the Four Countries Conference of the International Training Commission), Int. J. Psychoanal., 18, 369-371.
2. Doehrman, M. (1976), Parallel process in supervision and psychotherapy, Bull. Menninger Clin., 40, 3-104.
3. Ekstein, R., and Wallerstein, R. (1958), The teaching and learning of psychotherapy, Basic Books, New York.
4. Friedlander, M., Siegel, S., and Brenock, K. (1989), Parallel processes in counseling and supervision: A case study, J. Counsel. Psychol., 36, 149-157.
5. Kovacs, V. (1936), Training and control analysis, Int. J. Psychoanal., 17, 346-354.
6. Searles, H. (1955), The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experiences, Psychiatry, 18, 135-146.