Usefulness of a quantitative analysis of the recovery phase patterns of the ST-segment depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

American Journal of Medicine

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 592-598

  Herpin, Daniel ^a   Ferrandis, Jérôme ^b   Couderq, Christophe ^b   Gaudeau, Bernard ^b   Ragot, Stéphanie ^b   Gigon, Sandrine ^b   Demange, Jean ^b  

^a POITIERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ST SEGMENT DEPRESSION; THORAX PAIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0030424911     PISSN: 00029343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00302-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1. Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D, et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation. 1989;80:87-98.
2. 2. Elamin MS, Mary DASG, Smith DR, Linden RJ. Prediction of severity of coronary artery disease using slope of submaximal ST segment/heart rate relationship. Cardiovasc Res. 1980,14:681-691.
3. 3. Detrano R, Salcedo E, Passalacqua M, Friis R. Exercise electrocardiographic variables: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8:836-847.
4. 4. Lachterman B, Lehmann KG, Detrano R, et al. Comparison of ST segment/ heart rate index to standard criteria for analysis of exercise electrocardiogram. Circulation. 1990;82:44-50.
5. 5. Okin PM, Bergman G, Kligfield P. Effect of ST measurement point on performance of standard and heart rate-adjusted ST segment criteria for the identification of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1991;84:57-66.
6. 6. Morise P, Duval RD. Diagnostic accuracy of heart rate-adjusted ST segments compared with standard ST-segment criteria. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75:118-121.
7. 7. Herpin D, Ferrandis J, Borderon P, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of different methods of measurement of heart-rate-adjusted ST-segment depression during exercise testing for identification of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1147-1151.
8. 8. Parrens E, Douard H, Couffinal T, et al. Apport de la boucle effort-récupération des variations du segment ST selon la fréquence cardiaque au diagnostic de la maladie coronaire et de la resténose après angioplastie. Arch Mal Coeur. 1994;87:1283-1288.
9. 9. Okin PM, Ameisen O, Kligfield P. Recovery-phase patterns of ST segment depression in the heart rate domain. Identification of coronary artery disease by the rate-recovery loop. Circulation. 1989;80:533-541.
10. 10. Gavrielides S, Kaski JC, Galassi AR, et al. Recovery-phase patterns of ST segment depression in the heart rate domain cannot distinguish between anginal patients with coronary artery disease and patients with syndrome X. Am Heart J. 1991;122:1593-1598.
11. 11. Burton P, Kaski JC, Maseri A. A combination of electrocardiographic methods represents a further step toward the noninvasive identification of patients with syndrome X. Am Heart J. 1992;123:53-58.
12. 12. Romhilt DW, Bove KE, Norris RJ, et al. A critical appraisal of the electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1969;11:185-195.
13. 13. American Heart Association Committee on Electrocardiography. Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for instruments in ECG/VCG. Circulation. 1975;52:11-25.
14. 14. Meyer CR, Keiser HN. Electrocardiogram baseline noise estimation and removal using cubic splines and state-space computation techniques. Comput Biomed Res. 1977;10:459-470.
15. 15. Bhargava V, Watanabe K, Froelicher VF. Progress in computer analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1981;47:1143-1151.
16. 16. Ellestad MH. Stress Testing. Principles and Practice. 3d ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1986:234-236.
17. 17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29-36.
18. 18. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-843.
19. 19. Bigi R, Maffi M, Occhi G, et al. Improvement in identification of multivessel disease after acute myocardial infarction following stress-recovery analysis of ST depression in the heart rate domain during exercise. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:1240-1246.
20. 20. Gavrielides S, Kaski JC, Tousoulis D, et al. Duration of ST segment depression after exercise-induced myocardial ischemia is influenced by body position during not by type of exercise. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1665-1670.
21. 21. Philbrick JT, Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: groups, analysis and bias. Am J Cardiol. 1980;46:807-812.
22. 22. Okin PM, Kligfield P. Population selection and performance of the exercise ECG for the identification of coronary disease. Am Heart J. 1994;127:296-304.