Evaluating chemical transport models: Comparison of effects of different CFC-11 emission scenarios

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 101, Issue D9, 1996, Pages 14381-14385

  Hartley, Dana E ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALE/GAGE; ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CCM2; CFC-11; CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODEL; MODEL EVALUATION; NCAR;

EID: 0030424188     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/96JD00865     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Brown, M., Deduction of emissions of source gases using an objective inversion algorithm and a chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 12,639-12,660, 1993.
2. 3F data, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 8379-8400, 1983.
3. 2 estimated from ALE/GAGE and other measurements from July 1978 to June 1991, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1107-1126, 1994.
4. 2O, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 3985-4001, 1986.
5. 3F as a test for 3-D atmospheric models, in Report for WCRP Workshop on Long-Range Transport of Trace Gases, edited by M. Prather, World Clim. Res. Program, World Meteorol. Organ., Geneva, 1992.
6. Hartley, D., and R. Prinn, Feasibility of determining surface emissions of trace gases using an inverse method in a three-dimensional chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 5183-5198, 1993.
7. 3F sim-ulations with ALE/GAGE observations, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 12,885-12,896, 1994.
8. Kao, C. K., X. Tie, E. Mroz, D. Cunnold, and F. Alyea, Simulation of the global CFC-11 using the Los Alamos chemical tracer model, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 15,827-15,838, 1992.