A standard protocol for the evaluation of laser treatment of the prostate

British Journal of Urology

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 876-885

  Carter, A C ^a  

^a TAUNTON AND SOMERSET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asessment; Follow up; Laser treatment; Outcome; Prostate; Protocol

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LASER SURGERY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE DISEASE; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0030423266     PISSN: 00071331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.23812.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. N'eal DE. Transurethral prostatectomy. Kr Med J 1994; 81: 484-5
2. Mebusl WK, Holtgrewe HL. Cockett ATK. Peters PC and Writing Committee. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A co-operative study of 1 3 participating institutions evaluating 5885 patients. J Ural 1989: 141: 243-7
3. Anson K. Nawrocki J. Buckley J et al. A multicenter. randomised, prospective study of endoscopie laser ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology 1995: 46: 305-10
4. Costello AJ. Lusaya DG, Crowe HR. Transurethral laser ablation of the prostate -long term results. World J Urol 1995: 13: 119-22
5. James MJ. Harriss DR, Ceccherini A. Manhire AR. Bates CP. A urodynamic study of laser ablation of the prostate and a comparison of techniques. Br J Urol 1995: 76: 179-83
6. Cowles RS. Kabalin JN. Childs S et al. A prospective randomised comparison of transurethral resection to visual laser ablation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1995; 46: 155-60
7. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ. O'Leary MP. Measuring disease-specific health status in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med Care 1995: 33 (suppl): AS145-54