Comparative NMR study of new carbon forms

Carbon

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1287-1291

  Maniwa, Y ^a   Sato, M ^a   Kume, K ^a   Kozlov, M E ^b,c   Tokumoto, M ^b  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ELECTROTECHNICAL LABORATORY   (Japan)

^c INSTITUTE OF SEMICONDUCTOR PHYSICS   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

C60; Carbon nanotube; Diamond; Fullerenes; Hard carbon; NMR; Polymer

Indexed keywords

COMPACTION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIAMONDS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; FULLERENES; GRAPHITE; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRESSURE EFFECTS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

CARBON 13 NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; CARBON NANOTUBES;

CARBON;

EID: 0030415201     PISSN: 00086223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(96)00116-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. For a review, see Physics and Chemistry of the Fullerenes, (Edited by K. Prassides). Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (1994).
2. S. Iijima, Nature 354, 56 (1991).
3. D. Ugarte, Nature 359, 707 (1992).
4. A. M. Rao, P. Zhou, K.-A. Wang, G. T. Hager, J. M. Holden, Y. Wang, W.-T. Lee, X.-X. Bi, P. C. Eklund, D. S. Cornett, M. A. Duncan and I. J. Amster, Science 259, 955 (1993).
5. Y. Iwasa, T. Arima, R. M. Fleming, T. Siegrist, O. Zhou, R. C. Haddon, L. J. Rothberg, K. B. Lyons, H. L. Carter, Jr., A. F. Hebard, R. Tycko, G. Dabbagh, J. J. Krajewski, G. A. Thomas and T. Yagi, Science 264, 1570 (1994).
6. M. N.-Regueiro, L. Marques, J.-L. Hodeau, O. Bethoux and M. Perroux, Phys, Rev. Lett. 74, 278 (1995).
7. M. E. Kozlov, M. Hirabayashi, K. Nozaki, M. Tokumoto and I. Ihara, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1199 (1995).
8. T. W. Ebbsen, H. Hiura, J. Fujita, Y. Ochiai, S. Matui and K. Tanigaki, Chem. Phys. Lett. 209, 83 (1993).
9. M. Mehring, High Resolution NMR Spectroscopy in Solid. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York (1983).
10. Y. Maniwa, K. Mizoguchi, K. Kume, K. Kikuchi, S. Suzuki and Y. Achiba, Solid State Commun. 80, 609 (1991).
11. R. D. Johnson, C. S. Yannoni, H. C. Dorn, J. R. Salem and D. S. Bethune, Science 255, 1235 (1992).
12. R. Tycko, G. Dabbagh, R. M. Fleming, R. C. Haddon, A. V. Makhija and S. M. Zahurak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1886 (1991).
13. Y. Maniwa, M. Nagasaka, A. Ohi, K. Kume, K. Kikuchi, K. Saito, I. Ikemoto, S. Suzuki and Y. Achiba, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (Part 2) 33, L173 (1994).
14. Y. Hiroyama and K. Kume, Solid State Commun. 65, 617 (1988).
15. M. Lender, A. Hohener and R. R. Ernst, J. Mag. Resonance 35, 379 (1979).
16. The apparent stronger temperature dependence of the sharp lines as compared with the broad line can be explained by a fact that the spectra are convolution of two contributions. One is the anisotropy and the other is contribution from the Curie-like spins. The temperature dependence is due to Curie-like spins, which gives the same linewidth for the broad and sharp lines. However, because of the smaller anisotropy of the sharp line, it has an apparent stronger temperature dependence compared with the broad line.
17. T. Ishida, M. Tsuda, T. Nogami, S. Kurono and M. Ohashi, Fullerene Sci. Technol. 2, 155 (1994).
18. M. E. Kozlov, A. A. Zakhidov, K. Yakushi and M. Tokumoto, J. Phys. Chem., in press.
19. 60 polymers using MAS NMR (IWEPNM '96).
20. A. B. Smith III, H. Tokuyama, R. M. Strongin, G. T. Furst, W. J. Romanow, B. T. Chait, U. A. Mirza and I. Haller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 9359 (1995).
21. S. Iijima, T. Wakabayashi and Y. Achiba, J. Chem. Phys. in press.
22. M. Fujita, T. Umeda and M. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. B 51, 13778 (1995).
23. A. P. Ramirez, R. C. Haddon, O. Zhou, R. M. Fleming, J. Zhang, S. M. McClure and R. E. Smalley, Science 265, 84 (1994).
24. O. Chauvet, L. Forro, W. Bacsa, D. Ugarte, B. Doudin and W. A. de Heer, Phys. Rev. B 52, R6963 (1995).