Dynamics of photoexcited electrons in metals studied with time-resolved two-photon photoemission

Surface Science

Volumn 368, Issue 1-3, 1996, Pages 76-81

  Knoesel, E ^a   Hotzel, A ^a   Hertel, T ^a   Wolf, M ^a   Ertl, G ^a  

^a FRITZ HABER INSTITUT DER MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Copper; Electron solid interactions; Non linear optical methods; Photoelectron spectroscopy; Secondary electron emission; Silver Tantalum

Indexed keywords

COPPER; ELECTRON SCATTERING; ELECTRONS; FERMI LEVEL; NONLINEAR OPTICS; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; PHOTOEMISSION; SILVER; TANTALUM; THERMAL EFFECTS;

SECONDARY ELECTRON EMISSION; TIME RESOLVED TWO PHOTON PHOTOEMISSION;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 0030413931     PISSN: 00396028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(96)01032-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. R.R. Chavanagh, D.S. King, J.C. Stephenson and T.F. Heinz, J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 786.
2. R. Haight, Surf. Sc. Rep. 21 (1995) 275.
3. V. Dose, Surf. Sc. Rep. 5 (1985) 337.
4. T. Fauster and W. Steinmann, in: Electromagnetic Waves: Recent Developments in Research, Ed. P. Halevi (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995) p. 350.
5. J. Bokor and R. Haight, in: Angle-Resolved Photoemission Ed. S.D. Kevan (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992) p. 553.
6. M. Baeumler and R. Haight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1991) 815.
7. J.R. Goldman and J.A. Prybyla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 1364.
8. W.S. Fann, R. Storz, H.W.K. Tom and J. Bokor, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 13592.
9. C.A. Schmuttenmaer, M. Aeschlimann, H.E. Elsayed-Ali, R.J.D. Miller, D.A. Mantell, J. Cao and Y. Gao, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 8957.
10. M. Aeschlimann, S. Pawlik and M. Bauer, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 1504.
11. T. Hertel, E. Knoesel, M. Wolf and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 535.
12. S. Ogawa and H. Petek, Surf. Sci. 357/358 (1996) 585.
13. R.W. Schoenlein, J.G. Fujimoto, G.L. Eesley and T.W. Capehart, Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 4688.
14. MK. Reed, M.S. Armas, M.K. Steiner-Shepard and D.K. Negus, Opt. Lett. 20 (1995) 605.
15. E. Knoesel, T. Hertel, M. Wolf and G. Ertl, Chem. Phys. Lett. 240 (1995) 409.
16. D. Pine and P. Nozieres, The Theory of Quantum Liquids (Benjamin, New York, 1966).
17. The results for Cu reported in Refs. [9,10] were obtained from autocorrelation measurements with ∼3.3 eV photons, suggesting a different contribution of secondary electrons. See also Ref. [12] for a discussion of the data analysis.
18. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1986).
19. The Fermi energies for Cu, Ag, Ta are 7.0, 5.5 and ∼6 eV, respectively.
20. M. Aeschlimann, M. Bauer and S. Pawlik, Chem. Phys. 205 (1996) 127.
21. M. Wolf, E. Knoesel, A. Hotzel and G. Ertl, to be published.
22. R.H. Ritchie and J.C. Ashley, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 1689.
23. F. Weik, A.D. Meijere and E. Hasselbrink, J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 682.
24. We note, however, that the data analysis in Ref. [11] is actually supported by the results of our simulation.
25. G. Grimvall, The Electron-Photon Interaction in Metals (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).