On the equivalence of EELS and IRAS: The case of O-Ag(110)

Surface Science

Volumn 369, Issue 1-3, 1996, Pages 336-342

  Vattuone, L ^a   Rocca, M ^a   Valbusa, U ^a  

^a INFM   (Italy)

Author keywords

Electron energy loss spectroscopy; Low index single crystal surfaces; Oxygen; Silver; Vibrations of adsorbed molecules

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; CHARGE TRANSFER; ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS; OXYGEN; SILVER;

INFRARED REFLECTION ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY (IRAS); STRETCHING VIBRATIONS;

SURFACE STRUCTURE;

EID: 0030407899     PISSN: 00396028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(96)00877-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. L. Vattuone, U. Valbusa and M. Rocca, Surf. Sci. 317 (1994) L1120.
2. F. Stietz, A. Pantförder, J.A. Schaefer, G. Meister and A. Goldmann, Surf. Sci. 318 (1994) L1201.
3. M.R. Peng and J.E. Reutt-Robey, Surf. Sci. 336 (1995) L755.
4. T. Schimizu and M. Tsukada, Surf. Sci. 295 (1993) L1017.
5. -.
6. -.
7. 2 in Eq. (1), the reported value of q is smaller by a factor of 2π than the real value. The charge transfer needed to explain all the frequency shift by dipole-dipole coupling alone is thus larger than the charge transfer needed to account for the observed intensity, and not smaller as stated there.
8. H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. 66 (1977) 56.
9. H. Ibach and D.L. Mills, in: Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy and Surface Vibrations (Academic Press, New York, 1982).
10. L. Vattuone, M. Rocca, G. Molinari and M. Repetto, in: 6th Int. IGTE Symp. Numerical Field Calculation in Electrical Engineering - Proceedings, Ed. K.R. Richter (IGTE Technical University of Graz, Graz, 1994).
11. F. Steitz, private communication.
12. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 58th ed, Ed. R.C. Weast (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1977) p. E81.
13. A.D. Ubbelohde and F.A. Lewis, Graphite and its Crystal Compounds (Oxford University Press, London, 1960).
14. K. Giesen, F. Hage, F.J. Himpsel, H.J. Riess, W. Steinmann and N.V. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 35 (1987) 975.
15. A. Englhardt and D. Menzel, Surf. Sci. 57 (1976) 591.
16. R. Sporken, P.A. Thiry, J.J. Pireaux, R. Caudano and A. Adnot, Surf. Sci. 160 (1985) 443.
17. M. Canepa, P. Cantini, L. Mattera, S. Terreni and F. Valdenazzi, Phys. Scr. T 41 (1992) 226.
18. L. Vattuone, M. Rocca, C. Boragno and U. Valbusa, J. Chem. Phys. 101 (1994) 742. The dipole moment given in that paper agrees with the values obtained here, within experimental error. The apparent disagreement in the charge transfer is due to the different definition of q and e * (q≈2 e *). In the present paper the same definitions used in Ref. [10] have been used for consistency.
19. A. Pantförder, F. Stietz, A. Goldsmith and R. Courths, J. Phys. C 7 (1995) 5281.