Ceteris paribus: An evolution within agricultural econometrics

European Review of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 262-280

  Bessler, David A ^a   Dearmont, David ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chance; Demand analysis; Econometrics; Experimental methods; Structure

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMETRICS; CETERIS PARIBUS; DEMAND ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGICAL ROLE;

EID: 0030406354     PISSN: 01651587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/erae/23.3.262     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Allen, P. G. (1994). Economic forecasting in agriculture. International Journal of Forecasting 10: 81-135.
2. Battalio, R., Kagel, J., Winkler, R., Fisher Jr., E., Basmann, R. and Krasner, L. (1973). A test of consumer demand theory using observations of individual consumer purchases. Western Journal of Economics 11: 411-428.
3. Bessler, D. and Covey, T. (1993). On the search for econometric structure in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74 (Anniversary Issue): 41-47.
4. Blaug, M. (1985). Great Economists Since Keynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Burks, A. W. (1977). Chance, Cause, Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Scientific Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Davis, D. and Holt, C. (1993). Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. Dawid, A. P. (1992). Prequential analysis, stochastic complexity, and Bayesian inference. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid and A. F. M. Smith (eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109-125.
8. Dearmont, D. (1995). A hint at Peirce's empirical evidence for tychism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31(1): 185-204.