Fuzzy multicriteria ranking of urban transportation investment alternatives

Transportation Planning and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 15-31

  Teng, Junn Yuan ^a   Tzeng, Gwo Hshiung ^b  

^a Hua Fan College of Humanities and Technology Taiwan   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fuzzy sets; Multicriteria ranking method; Multiple criteria decision making; Ranking; Transportation investment; Urban

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; FUZZY SETS; URBAN PLANNING;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; KIM-PARK METHOD; MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTICRITERIA RANKING METHOD; TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT;

TRANSPORTATION;

FUZZY MULTICRITERIA RANKING; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; TRANSPORT INVESTMENT; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 0030404613     PISSN: 03081060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081069608717577     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bortolan, G. and Degani, R., A Review of Some Methods for Ranking Fuzzy Subsets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 1-19 (1985).
2. Chen, S. H., Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 113-130 (1985).
3. Cheslow, M. d., Issues in the Evaluation of Metropolitan Transportation Alternatives. Transportation Research Record, No. 751, 1-8 (1980).
4. Gomes, L. F. A. M., Multicriteria Ranking of Urban Transportation System Alternations. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 23(1), 43-52 (1989a).
5. Gomes, L. F. A. M., Comparing Two Methods for Multicriteria Ranking of Urban Transportation System Alternations. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 23(2), 217-219 (1989b).
6. Gomes, L. F. A. M., Modeling Interdependence Among Urban Transportation System Alternatives Within A Multicriteria Ranking Framework. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 24(1), 77-85 (1990).
7. Hill, M., A Goals Achievement Matrix for Evaluating Alternative Plans, Journal of the American institute of Planners, 44(1) (1968).
8. Hill, M., Planning for Multiple Objectives: An Approach to Evaluation of Transportation Plans. Monograph No. 5. Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (1973).
9. Holmes, J. C., An Ordinal Method of Evaluation. Urban Studies, 9(1), 179-191 (1972).
10. Holmes, J. C., An Ordinal Method of Evaluation. A Rejoinder. Urban Studies, 10(1), 101-104 (1973).
11. Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Sprinnger-Verlag, New York (1981).
12. Jain, R., Procedure for Multi-Asspect. Decision Making Using Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Systems Sciences, 8, 1-7 (1977).
13. Janarthanan, N. and Schneider, J., Multicriteria Evaluation of Alternatives. Transportation Research Record, No. 1064, 1-9 (1984).
14. Kaufmmann, A. and Gupta, M. M. (1988), Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science, Elsevier, New York.
15. Kim, K. and Park, K. S., Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Index of Optimism. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 35, 143-150 (1990).
16. Kula, E., Future Generations and Discounting Rules in Public Sector Investment Appraisal. Environment and Planning A, 13, 899-910 (1981).
17. Luce, R. and Raffia, H., Games and Decision, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1975).
18. Mahmassani, H. and Krzysztofowicz, A Behaviorally Based Framework for Multicriteria Decision-Making under Uncertainty in the Urban Transportation Context. Environment and Planning B, 10, 193-206 (1983).
19. Nijkamp, P. and Voogd, H., An Introduction to Multicriteria Evaluation: Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications, Spriinger-Verlag, London (1985).
20. Nowland, D. M., The Use of Criteria Weights in Rank Ordering Techniques of Project Evaluation. Urban Studies, 12(2), 169-176 (1975).
21. O'Leary, T. J., The Cost / Benefit Analysis: It Can be A Misleading Tool for Transportation Planners. Transportation Planning and Technology, 5, 189-193 (1979).
22. Park, Y. H., Park, E. H., and Ntuen, C. A., Investment Decision: An Integrated Economic and Strategic Approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 9(1-4), 534-539 (1990).
23. Park, P. S. Tsuji, K. and Suzubi, Y., Comprehensive Evaluation of New Urban Transportation Systems by AHP, International Journal of Systems Science, 18(6), 1179-1190 (1987).
24. Potus, A. and Tjomecki, A. B., A Level-of-Service Framework for Evaluating System Management Alternatives. Transportation Research Record, No. 1081, 47-53 (1985).
25. Roy, B., Problems and Methods with Multiple Objective Functions. Mathematical Programming 1, 239-266 (1971).
26. Roy, B. and Hugonnard, J. C., Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multicriteria Method. Transportation Research 16A(4), 301-312 (1982).
27. Roy, B., Present, M. and Silhol. A Programming Method for Determining which Pans Metro Stations Should be Renovated. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 358-334 (1986).
28. Saaty, T. L., A scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281 (1977).
29. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York (1980).
30. Teng, J. Y. and Tzeng, G. H. (1993), Multicriteria Evaluation for Strategies Improving and Controlling Air Quality in the Super City: A Case Study of Taspei City. Journal of Environmental Management, 40, 213-229.
31. Voogd, H., Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning, Pion. London (1983)
32. Won, J., Multicriteria Evaluation Approaches to Urban Transportation Projects. Urban Studies, 27(1), 119-138 (1990).
33. Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy Sets. Information and contral. 8(2), 338-353 (1965)