Analytically defined surfaces to analyze molecular interaction properties

Journal of Molecular Graphics

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 341-353

  Gabdoulline, R R ^a   Wade, R C ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROSTATICS; HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, SOMATOTROPIN; SOFTWARE; SOLVENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0030404063     PISSN: 02637855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7855(97)00008-8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 1 Lee, B. and Richards, FM. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 1971, 55, 379-400
2. 2 Eisenberg, D. and McLachlan, A.D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature (London) 1986, 319, 199-203
3. 3 Richards, F.M. Areas, volumes, packing, and protein structure. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 1977, 6, 151-176
4. 4 Connolly, M.L. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 1983, 221, 709-713
5. 5 Nicholls, A., Bharadwaj, R., and Honig, B. GRASP: Graphical representation and analysis of molecular surfaces. Biophys. J. 1993, 64, A166
6. 6 Lijnzaad, P., Berendsen, H.J.C., and Argos, P. Hydrophobic patches on the surfaces of protein structures. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 1996, 25, 389-397
7. 7 Fischer, D., Norel, R., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. Surface motifs by a computer vision technique: Searches, detection, and implications for protein-ligand recognition. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 1993, 16, 278-292
8. 8 Eisenhaber, F., Lijnzaad, P., Argos, P., Sander, C., and Scharf, M. The double cubic lattice method: Efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies. J. Comput. Chem. 1995, 16, 273-284
9. 9 Duncan, B. and Olson, A.J. Shape analysis of molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 1993, 33, 231-238
10. 10 Grant, J.A. and Pickup, B.T. A Gaussian description of the molecular shape. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 3503-3510
11. 11 Laskowski, R.A. SURFNET: A program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J. Mol. Graphics 1995, 13, 323-330
12. 12 Agishtein, M.E. Fuzzy molecular surfaces. J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam. 1992, 9, 759-768
13. 13 deVos, A.M., Ultsch, M., and Kossiakoff, A.A. Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: Crystal structure of the complex. Science 1992, 255, 306-313; pdb entry 303hhr, notations hGH, hGHR301, and HGHR302 are used for chains A, B, and C, respectively
14. 14 Bacon, D.J. and Moult, J. Docking by least-squares fitting of molecular surface patterns. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 225, 849-858
15. 15 Korn, G. A. and Korn, T.M. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961
16. 16 Murray, J.S., Brinck, T., and Politizer, P. Relationships of molecular surface electrostatic potentials to some macroscopic properties. Chem. Phys. 1996, 204, 289-299
17. 17 Richard, A.M. Quantitative comparison of molecular electrostatic potentials for structure-activity studies. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 959-969
18. 18 Masek, B.B. Molecular surface comparisons. In: Molecular Similarity in Drug Design (P.M. Dean, ed.). Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, Scotland, 1995, pp. 163-186
19. 19 Gasteiger, J., Li, X., Rudolph, C., Sadowski, J., and Zupan, J. Representation of molecular electrostatic potentials by topological feature maps. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4608-4620
20. 20 Gasteiger, J., Li, X., and Uschold, A. The beauty of molecular surfaces as revealed by self organizing neural networks. J. Mol. Graphics 1994, 12, 90-97
21. 21 Chau, P.L. and Dean, P.M. Molecular recognition: 3D surface structure comparison by gnomonic projection. J. Mol. Graphics 1987, 5, 97-100
22. 22 Duncan, B. and Olson, A.J. Approximation and characterization of molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 1993, 33, 219-229
23. 23 Clackson, T. and Wells, J.A. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 1995, 267, 383-386
24. 24 Preusser, A. Algorithm 671-FARB-E-2D: Fill area with bicubics on reactangles - a contour plot program. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 1989, 15, 79-89
25. 25 Madura, J.D., et al. Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solutions: Simulations with the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics Program. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91, 57-95
26. 26 Demchuk, E., Mueller, T., Oschkinat, H., Sebald, W., and Wade, R.C. Receptor binding properties of fourhelix-bundle growth factors deduced from electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci. 1994, 3, 920-935
27. 27 Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, W.G. Molecular similarity based on electrostatic potential and electric field. Int. J. Quantum Chem. Quantum Biol. Symp. 1987, 14, 105-110
28. 28 QUANTA Molecular Modeling Software Package. Molecular Simulations Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, 1992