Effect of tool vibrations on surface roughness during lathe dry turning process

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 637-644

  Thomas, M ^a   Beauchamp, Y ^a   Youssef, A Y ^a   Masounave, J ^a  

^a ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cutting parameters; Design of experiments; Full factorial design; Lathe dry turning operation; Measurements; Surface roughness; Tool vibrations

Indexed keywords

CARBON STEEL; CUTTING TOOLS; LATHES; MEASUREMENTS; RESONANCE; SPEED; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TURNING; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; FULL FACTORIAL DESIGN; TOOL VIBRATIONS; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0030402844     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(96)00235-5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Albrecht A.B., 1956, "How to secure desired surface finish in turning operations", American machinist, pp 133-136.
2. Beauchamp Y., Masounave J., Thomas M. and Youssef Y.A., 1995, 'Modeling of latthe dry turning operation variable's effects on surface roughness', submitted to ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry.
3. Beauchamp Y., Thomas M., Youssef Y.A. and Masounave J., 1994, 'Effect of lathe dry turning operation variables on surface roughness ', submitted to Quality Engineering.
4. Beauchamp Y, Thomas M., Masounave J and Youssef Y.A., 1994,' Application of a full factorial design for the development of prediction models for surface roughness in lathe turning and boring operations', Tenth international conference of the Israel society for quality, Part 2, Jerusalem, pp 953- 961.
5. Boubekri N., Schneider M. H. and Asfour S., 1992, " Effects of some machining variables in lathe facing using a profilometer to measure surface roughness", Quality Engineering, 5(2), pp 243-253.
6. Hasegawa M., Seireg A. and Lindberg RA., 1976, "Surface roughness model for turning", Tribology international, pp 285-289.
7. Jang D.Y., Seireg A., 1989, "Dynamic simulation for predicting surface roughness in turning" ,ASME Machinery dynamics applications and vibration control problems, De vol. 18 2, pp 31-36.
8. Kaczmarek J., 1976, 'Principles of machining by cutting, abrasion and erosion', Peter Peregrinus lted, Stevenage, Warsaw, 551 p.
9. Oben K.V., 1968, "Surface roughness on turned steel components and the relevant mathematical analysis", The production engineer, pp 593-606.
10. Sankar, R.S., and Osman, M.O.M., 1975, "Characterization of manufactured surface using random function excursive technique", ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 97, pp. 190-195.
11. Saxena J.P., 1982, 'Effect of machining conditions on cutting tool vibrations', Adv. Mach. Tool Des. Manuf. Technol., pp 98-106.
12. Taraman K., 1974, "Multi machining output multi independent variable turning research by response surface methodology", Int. J. Prod. Res., Vol 12 (2), pp 233-245.
13. Thomas, M. and Beauchamp, Y., 1993, "Prediction of surface roughness for turning using only controlled cutting parameters", CAD, CAM, Robotics and Autonomous Factories: Volume 1, Editors Juneja, B.L., Pujara, K.K., Sager, R.. TATA McGraw Hill, Dehli (India), pp. 517-526.
14. Thomas, M., Beauchamp Y., Youssef Y.A. and Masounave J.,' 1995, Effect of lathe dry turning parameters on surface roughness cutting forces and tool vibrations', submitted to ASME, Journal of Engineering for industry.
15. Tobias S.A., 1965, ' Machine-tool vibration', Blackie, london, 341 p.
16. Youssef YA., Beauchamp Y. and Thomas M., 1994 ,'Comparaison of a full factorial experiment to fractionnal and Taguchi designs in a lathe dry turning operation', Computers Ind. Eng., Vol 27, No 1-4, pp 59-62.