Consistent and inconsistent rules in competitive facility choice

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 1494-1503

  Drezner, Tammy ^a   Drezner, Zvi ^a   Eiselt, H A ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consumer behaviour; Facility location; Retail stores

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RETAIL STORES; SELECTION;

COMPETITIVE FACILITY CHOICE; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; SELECTION RULE;

LOCATION;

EID: 0030393329     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jors.1996.193     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. M. S. DASKIN (1995) Network and Discrete Locations: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. John Wiley, New York.
2. Z. DREZNER (Ed.) (1995) Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods, Springer Verlag, New York.
3. R. L. Francis, L. F. McGinnis Jr. and J. A. WHITE (1992) Facility Layout and Location: an Analytical Approach., 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
4. R. F. LOVE, J. G. Morris and G. O. Wesolowsky (1988) Facility Location: Models and Methods., North Holland, New York.
5. J. J. Gabszewicz and J. F. Thisse (1986) Spatial competition and the location of firms. Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics. 5, 1-71.
6. J. Gabszewicz and J. F. Thisse (1992) Location. In Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications. (R. Aumann and S. Hart, Eds) pp. 281-304. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
7. D. PEETERS and J. F. THISSE (1995) Economic models of firm location. In Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. (Z. Drezner, Ed.) pp 331-336. Springer Verlag, New York.
8. T. Friesz, T. Miller and R. Tobin (1988) Competitive network facility location models: a survey. Papers of the Regional Science Association. 65, 47-57.
9. S. L. Hakimi (1990) Location with spatial interactions: competitive locations and games. In Discrete Location Theory.(P. B. Mirchandani and R. L. Francis, Eds.) pp 439-478. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
10. T. Drezner (1995) Competitive facility location in the plane. In Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. (Z. Drezner, Ed.) pp 285-300. Springer-Verlag, New York.
11. A. GHOSH, S. McLafferty and C. S. CRAIG (1995) Multifacility retail networks. In Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. (Z. DREZNER, Ed.) pp 301-330. Springer-Verlag, New York.
12. D. SERRA and C. ReVelle (1995) Competitive location in discrete space. In Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. (Z. Drezner, Ed.) pp 367-386. Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. H. A. Eiselt, G. Laporte and J. F. THISSE (1993) Competitive location models: A framework and bibliography. Trans. Sci. 27, 44-54.
14. C. ReVelle (1986) The maximum capture or ‘sphere of influence’ location problem: Hotelling revisited on a network. J. Reg. Sci. 26, 343-358.
15. H. A. Eiselt and G. Laporte (1989) The maximum capture problem in a weighted network. J. Reg. Sci. 29, 433-439.
16. H. Hotelling (1929) Stability in competition. Econ. J. 39, 41-57.
17. D. Erlenkotter (1977) Facility location with price-sensitive demand: private, public, and quasi-public. Mgmt Sci. 24, 378-386.
18. G. DOBSON and U.S. Karmakar (1987) Competitive location on a network. Opns Res. 35, 565-574.
19. S. L. Haiumi (1983) On locating new facilities in a competitive environment. Eur. J. Opl Res. 12, 29-35.
20. S. L. Hakimi, M. Labbe and E. Schmeichel (1992) The Voronoi partition of a network and its implications in location theory. ORSA Journal of Computing 4, 412-417.
21. C. D’Aspremont, J. J. Gabszewicz and J.-F. Thisse (1979) On Hotelling’s ‘stability in competition’. Econometrica. 47, 1145-1150.
22. H. A. Eiselt and G. Laporte (1993) The existence of equilibria in the 3-facility Hotelling model in a tree. Trans. Sci. 27, 39-43.
23. M. Labbe and S. L. Hakimi (1991) Market and locational equilibrium for two competitors. Opns Res. 39, 749-756.
24. A. Okabke and A. Suzuki (1987) Stability of spatial competition for a large number of firms on a bounded two-dimensional spacq. Environment and Planning A. 19, 1067-1082.
25. S. P. Anderson, A. DePalma and J. F. Thisse (1992) Social surplus and profitability under different spatial pricing policies. Southern Econ. J. 58, 934-949.
26. J. H. Hamilton, J. F. Thisse and A. Weskamp (1989) Spatial discrimination: Bertrand vs Cournot in a model of location choice. Reg. Sci. and Urban Econ. 19, 87-102.
27. M. OSBORNE and C. PLTCHLCK (1987) Equilibrium in Hotelling’s model of spatial competition. Econometrica. 55, 911-922.
28. H. Bester (1989) Noncooperative bargaining and spatial competition. Econometrica. 57, 97-113.
29. N. S. ECONOMIDES (1986) Minimal and maximal product differentiation in Hotelling’s duopoly. Econ. Lett. 21, 67-71.
30. T. Kuroda (1989) Location of public facilities with spillover effects: variable locations and parametric scale. J. Reg. Sci. 29, 575-594.
31. H. A. Eiselt, G. Pederzoli and C. L. Sandblom (1988) On the location of a new service facility in an urban area. In Real Estate and Urban Management (H. Bartel, Ed.) pp. 42-55. Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada.
32. F. Aurenhammer and H. Edelsbrunner (1984) An optimal algorithm for constructing the weighted Voronoi diagram in the plane. Patt. Recog. 17, 251-257.
33. M. Nakanishi and L. G. COOPER (1974) Parameter estimate for multiplicative interactive choice model: least squares approach. J. Marketing Res. 11, 303-311.
34. T. Drezner (1994) Locating a single new facility among existing, unequally attractive facilities. J. Reg. Sci. 34, 237-252.
35. R. G. Golledge and H. Timmermans (Eds.) (1988) Behavioural Modelling in Geography and Planning. Croom Helm, London.
36. D. C. Prosperi and H. J. SCHULER (1976) An alternate method to identify rules of spatial choice. Geographical Perspectives. 38, 33-38.
37. H. TIMMERMANS (1982) Consumer choice of shopping centre: an information integration approach. Reg. Studies. 16, 171-182.
38. A. H. Spencer (1980) Cognition and shopping choice: a multidimensional scaling approach. Environment and Planning A. 12, 1235-1251.
39. H. Timmermans (1988) Multipurpose trips and individual choice behaviour: an analysis using experimental design data. In Behavioural Modelling in Geography and Planning. (R. G. Golledge and H. Timmermans Eds.) pp 356-367. Croom Helm, London.
40. R. M. DOWNS (1970) The cognitive structure of an urban shopping center. Environment and Behavior. 2, 13-39.
41. H. J. Schuler (1981) Grocery shopping choices-Individual preferences based on store attraciveness and distance. Environment and Behavior. 13, 331-347.
42. T. Drezner and Z. Drezner (1986) Competitive facilities: Market share and location with random utility, J. Reg. Sci. 36, 1-15.
43. A. DePalma, V. Ginsburgh, Y. Y. Papageorgiou and J.-F. Thisse (1985) The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity. Econometrica. 53, 767-781.
44. R. M. Braid (1988) Heterogeneous preferences and non-central agglomeration of firms. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 18, 57-68.
45. P. D. CONVERSE (1949) New laws of retail gravitation. Journal of Marketing. 14, 379-384.
46. W. J. REILLY (1931) The Law of Retail Gravitation., Knickerbocker Press, New York.
47. D. L. HUFF (1964) Defining and estimating a trade area. Journal of Marketing. 28, 34-38.
48. D. L. Huff (1966) A programmed solution for approximating an optimum retail location. Land Economics. 42, 293-303.
49. O. BERMAN, M. J. HODGSON and D. KRASS (1995) Flow interception problems. In Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. (Z. DREZNER Ed.), pp 427-452. Springer-Verlag, New York.
50. S. A. STOUFFER (1940) Intervening opportunities: A thory relating mobility an distance. American Sociological Review. 5, 845-867.