Estimating tree volume in tropical dry deciduous forest from landsat tm data

Geocarto International

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 33-39

  Oza, M P ^a   Srivastava, V K ^a   Devaiah, P K ^b  

^a INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION   (India)

^b Karnataka Forest Department   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; LANDSAT TM; REMOTE SENSING; TREE VOLUME; TROPICAL DRY FOREST; TROPICS;

INDIA, KARNATAKA, HUNSUR;

EID: 0030391102     PISSN: 10106049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10106049609354559     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahern, F., Erdle, T., Maclean, D.A., and Kneppeck, I.D., 1991. A quantitative relationship between forest growth rates and Thematic Mapper reflectance measurements. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 12(3):387–400.
2. Ahlcrona, E., 1988. The Impact of Climate on Land Transformation in Central Sudan, Lund:Lund University Press. Meddelande fran Lunds Universitets Geografiska Institutioner, Avhandlingar, 103.
3. Ardo, J., 1992. Volume quantification of coniferous forest compartments using spectral radiance recorded by Thematic Mapper. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 13(9):1779–1786.
4. Baldochii, D.D., Matts, D., Hutchinson, B.A., and Mc Millan, R.T., 1984. Solar radiation within oak-hickory forest:An evaluation of the extinction coefficient for several radiation scomponents during fully leaved and leafless periods. Agricul. and Forest Meteorol., 23:3077–3122.
5. Banninger, C., Relationship between tree density, leaf area index, soil metal content and Landsat MSS canopy radiance values. Proc. IGARSS Symp. Sept.8–111986, Zurich. pp. 1401–1404.
6. Colwell, R.N., ed. 1983. Manual of Remote Sensing, Maryland, U.S.A.:American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
7. Cook, A.E., Iverson, L.R., and Graham, R.L., 1989. Estimating forest productivity with Thematic Mapper and Biogeographical data. Remote Sens. Environ., 28:131–141.
8. Curran, P.J., 1981. “ Multispectral remote sensing for estimating biomass and productivity ”. In Plant and the Daylight Spectrum, Edited by:Smith, H., London:Academic Press.
9. Dymond, J.R., Stephens, P.R., Newsome, P.F., and Wilde, R.H., 1992. Percentage vegetation cover of a degrading rangeland from SPOT. Inter. J. Remote Sens., 13(11):1999–2007.
10. Franklin, J., 1986. Thematic Mapper analysis of coniferous forest structure and composition. Inter. J. Remote Sens., 7:1571–1588.
11. Franklin, J., and Hiernaux, P.H.Y., 1991. Estimating foliage and woody biomass in Sahelian and Sudanian woodlands using a remote sensing model. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 12(6):1387–1404.
12. Furnival, G.M., and Wilson, R.W., 1974. Regression by leaps and bounds. Technometrics, 16:1571–1588.
13. Horler, D.H., and Ahern, F.J., 1986. Forestry information content of Thematic Mapper data. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 7(3):405–428.
14. IMSL. 1982. IMSL Library:User's Manual, IMSL -OO9, NBC Building Huston, Texas 7500 Bellaire Bonlevard
15. Jensen, J.R., and Hodgson, M.E., 1985. Remote sensing forest biomass:an evaluation using high resolution remote sensor data and loblolly pine plots. Professional Geographer, 31(1):46–56.
16. Justice, C.O., 1986. Monitorying the grasslands of semi - arid Africa using NOAA-AVHRR data (ea. by). Intern. J. Remote Sens., 7(11)
17. Leprieur, C.E., Durand, J.M., and Peyron, J.L., 1988. Influence of topography on forest reflectance using Landsat Thematic Mapper and digital terrain data. Photogram. Engineer. Remote Sens., 54(4):491–496.
18. Markham, B.L., and Barker, J.L., 1987. Radiometric properties of US processed Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ., 22:39–71.
19. Maslekar, A.R., 1981. Forester's Companion, Dehradun, India:Jugal Kishor and Company.
20. National Commission on Agriculture. 1976. vol. IX-Forestry, Manager, New Delhi:Govt. of India Press.
21. Olsson, K., 1985. Remote sensing for fuelwood resources and land degradation studies in Kordofan, The Sudan, Lund, Sweden:The Royal University of Lund, Dept. of Geography. Ph.D. Dissertation
22. Oza, M.P., Srivastava, V.K., and Devaiah, P.K., 1992. Estimating the mean canopy diameter of teak plantations from Landsat MSS data. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 13(12):2363–2369.
23. Oza, M.P., Srivastava, V.K., Pariswad, B.S, and Setty, K.R.V., 1989. Relationship between Landsat MSS and forest tree parameters. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 10(11):1813–1819.
24. Prince, S.D., 1991a. “ High temporal frequency remote sensing of primary production using NOAA-AVHRR ”. In In Remote Sensing and Agriculture (48th Nottingham Easter School in agricultural Sciences), Edited by:Steven, M.D., and Clarke, J., London:Butterworths.
25. Prince, S.D., 1991b. A model of regional primary production for use with coarse resolution satellite data. Intern. J. remote Sens., 12:1323–1330.
26. Ranson, K.J., and Daughtry, C.S.T., 1987. Scene shadow effects on multispectral response. IEEE Trans. Geos. Remote Sens., GE-25(4):502–509.
27. Ripple, W.J., Wang, S., lsaacson, D.L., and Paine, D.P., 1991. A preliminary comparison of Landsat TM and SPOT-1 HRV multispectral data for estimating coniferous forest volume. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 12(9):1971–1977.
28. Sader, S.A., Waide, R.B., Lowrence, W.T., and Joyce, A.T., 1989. Tropical forest biomass and successional age relationships to a vegetation index derived from Landsat TM data. Remote sens. Environ., 28:143–156.
29. Spanner, M.A., Price, L.L., Peterson, D.L., and Running, S.W., 1990. Remote sensing of temperate coniferous forest leaf area index:The influence of canopy closure, understorey vegetation and background reflectance. Intern. J. Remote Sens., 11(1):1383–1388.
30. Vanclay, J.K., and Preston, R.A., 1990. Utility of Landsat Thematic Mapper data for mapping site productivity in tropical moist forests. Photogram. Engineer. Remote Sens., 56(10):1383–1388.
31. Vinogradev, B., Remote sensing of the arid zone vegetation in the visible spectrum for studying the productivity. Proc. 6th Intern. Symp. Remote Sens. Environ. Ann. Arbor, Michigan. pp. 1237–1250.