Comparison of flow-related habitat evaluations downstream of low-head weirs on small and large fluvial ecosystems

Regulated Rivers: Research and Management

Volumn 12, Issue 4-5, 1996, Pages 459-469

  Gore, James A ^a   Hamilton, Steven W ^b  

^a University System of Georgia   (United States)

^b AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Instream flow models; Peaking hydropower; Physical habitat; Re regulation dam; Remediation; Restoration; Weirs

Indexed keywords

DAM; HABITAT EVALUATION; MACROINVERTEBRATE; PHABSIM; REGULATION; RIVER REGULATION; STREAM RESTORATION; STREAMFLOW; WEIR;

USA, TENNESSEE, BRUSHY BRANCH; USA, TENNESSEE, CUMBERLAND RIVER;

SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0030389821     PISSN: 08869375     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1646(199607)12:4/5<459::aid-rrr413>3.0.co;2-t     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bartholow, J. M., Laake, J. L., Stalnaker, C.B., and Williamson, S. C., 1993. 'A salmonid population model with emphasis on habitat limitations', Rivers, 4, 265-279.
2. Bedford, K. W., Sykes, R. M., and Libicki, C. 1983. 'Dynamic advective water quality model for rivers', J. Environ. Eng. Div., Atmos. Soc. Civil Eng., 109, 535-545.
3. Bovee, K. D. 1982. 'A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology', Instream Flow Info. Paper No. 12. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, FWS/OBS-82/26.
4. Bovee, K. D. 1986. 'Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the instream flow incremental methodology', Instream Flow Info. Paper No. 21. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, Bio. Rpt. 86(7).
5. Cheslak, E. F., and Jacobson, A. S. 1990. 'Integrating the instream flow incremental methodology with a population response model Rivers, 1, 264-288.
6. Curtis, L. T., Nestler, J. M., and Martin, J. L. 1987. 'Comparative effects on trout habitat of hydropower modification with and without reregulation in the Cumberland River below Wolf Creek Dam, Kentucky', Misc. Paper EL-87-2. US Army Engineer Waters Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
7. Fraley, J., and Decker-Hess, J. 1987. 'Effects of stream and lake regulation on reproductive success of Kokanee in the Flathead system, Montana, U.S.A', Regul. Riv., 1, 257-265.
8. Gore, J. A. 1985. 'Mechanisms of colonization and habitat enhancement for benthic macroinvertebrates in restored river channels', in Gore, J. A. (Ed.), The Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Butterworth, Boston, pp. 81-101.
9. Gore, J. A. 1989. 'Models for predicting benthic macroinvertebrate habitat suitability under regulated flows', in Gore, J. A., and Petts, G. E. (Eds), Alternatives in Regulated River Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 253-265.
10. Gore, J. A., and Johnson, L. S. 1981. 'Strip-mined river restoration', Wat. Spectr., 13, 31-38.
11. Gore, J. A., and R. D. Judy, Jr. 1981. 'Predictive models of benthic macroinvertebrate density for use in instream flow studies and regulated flow management', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 38, 1363-1370.
12. Gore, J. A., and Nestler, J. M. 1988. 'Instream flow studies in perspective', Regul. Riv., 2, 93.
13. Gore, J. A., and Pennington, W. 1988. 'Changes in larval chironomid habitat with distance from peaking hydropower operations', Bull. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 5, 100.
14. Gore. J. A., and Petts, G. E. (Eds) 1989. Alternatives in Regulated River Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
15. Gore, J. A., and Shields, F. D., Jr. 1995. 'Can large rivers be restored', BioScience, 45, 142-152.
16. Gore, J. A., Nestler, J. M., and Layzer, J. B. 1989. 'Instream flow predictions and management options for biota affected by peaking-power hydroelectric operations', Regul. Riv., 3, 35-48.
17. Heede, B. H., and Rinne, J. N. 1990. 'Hydrodynamic and fluvial geomorphological processes: implications for fisheries management and research', N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 10, 249-268.
18. Heggenes, J. 1990. 'Habitat utilization and preferences in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in streams', Regul. Riv., 5, 341-354.
19. Heggenes, J. 1991. 'Comparisons of habitat availability and habitat use by an allopatric cohort of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) under conditions of low competition in a Norwegian stream', Hol. Ecol., 14, 51-62.
20. Johnson, B. H. 1983. User's guide for Branched Implicit River Model (BIRM) with application to the lower Mississippi River. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
21. Luedtke, R. J., Brusven, M. A., and Watts, F. J. 1976. 'Benthic insect community changes in relation to instream alterations of a sediment-polluted stream', Melanderia, 23, 21-39.
22. Merritt, R. W., and Cummins, K. W. (Eds) 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd edn. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.
23. Nestler, J. M., Gore, J. A., Curtis, L. T., and Martin, J. L. 1988. 'Predicted effects of hydropower uprate on trout habitat in the Cumberland River, downstream of Wolf Creek Dam, Kentucky', Misc. Rpt. EL-88-10. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
24. Nestler, J. M., Milhous, R. T., and Layzer, J. B. 1989. 'Instream habitat modeling techniques', in Gore, J. A., and Petts, G. E. (Eds), Alternatives in Regulated River Management. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL. pp. 295-315.
25. Nickelson, T. E., Solazzi, M. F., Johnson, S. L., and Rodgers, J. D. 1992. 'Effectiveness of selected stream improvement techniques to create suitable summer and winter rearing habitat for juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhyncus kisutch) in Oregon coastal streams', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49, 790-794.
26. Petts, G. E. 1984. Impounded Rivers. Perspectives for Ecological Management. Wiley, Chichester.
27. Scott, D. S., and Shirvell, C. S. 1987. 'A critique of the instream flow incremental methodology and observations on flow determinations in New Zealand', in Craig, J. F., and Kemper, J. B. (Eds), Regulated Streams. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 27-43.
28. Shirvell, C. S. 1990. 'Role of instream rootwads as juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and steelhead trout (O. mykiss) cover habitat under varying streamflows', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 47, 852-861.
29. Shuler, S. W., and Nehring, R. B. 1993. 'Using the physical habitat simulation model to evaluate a stream habitat enhancement project', Rivers, 4, 175-193.
30. Spalding, S., Peterson, N. P., and Quinn, T. P. 1995. 'Summer distribution, survival, and growth of juvenile coho salmon under varying experimental conditions of brushy instream cover', Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 124, 124-130.
31. Stalnaker, C. B. 1993. 'Fish habitat models in environmental assessments', in Hildebrand, S. G., and Cannon, J. B. (Eds), Environmental Analysis: The NEPA-Experience. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp 150-162.
32. Statzner, B., Gore, J. A., and Resh, V. H. 1988. 'Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential application', J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 7, 307-360.
33. Thompson, C. S. 1985. 'Stream relocation on surface mined land', in Starnes, L. B. (Ed.), Fish and Wildlife Relationships to Mining. Water Quality Section, American Fisheries Society, Milwaukee, Wis. pp. 39-49.
34. Vaux, W. B. 1962. 'Interchange of stream and undergravel water in a salmon spawning riffle', Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish. 405. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
35. Wesche, T. A. 1985. 'Stream channel modifications and reclamation structures to enhance fish habitat', in Gore, J. A. (Ed.), The Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Butterworth, Boston, pp. 103-163.