Advances in local student modeling using informal fuzzy reasoning

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 697-722

  Hawkes, Lois Wright ^b   Derry, Sharon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FUZZY SETS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COMBINATORIAL EXPLOSION; INFORMAL FUZZY REASONING; LOCAL STUDENT MODELING; MATH WORD PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICS INTELLIGENT TUTORS; SEMANTIC INFORMATION; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0030388781     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0075     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ANDERSON, J. R., BOYLE, C. F. & REISER, J. F. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456-468.
2. BROWN, J. S. & BURTON, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
3. COLLINS, A. & BROWN, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. MANDL & A. LESGOLD, Eds. Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems pp. 1-18. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. COLLINS, A., BROWN, J. S. & NEWMAN, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. RESNICK, Ed. Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. DERRY, S. J. & HAWKES, L. W. (1993). On-line cognitive modeling of problem-solving behavior: an application of fuzzy theory. In S. LAJOIE & S. DERRY, Eds. Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. DERRY, S. & LAJOIE, S. (1993). A middle camp for (un)intelligent instructional computing: An introduction. In S. LAJOIE & S. DERRY, Eds. Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp. 1-14. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. DERRY, S. J. & THE TiPS PROJECT STAFF (1994). Psychological foundations of the TiPS system. Technical Report 94-1. WCER, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA.
8. DISESSA, A. (1985). A principled design for an integrated computational environment. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 1-47.
9. FOX, B. A. (1988a). Repair as a factor in interface design. Technical Report, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, U.S.A.
10. FOX, B. A. (1988b). Robust learning environments: the issue of canned text. Technical Report, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
11. GLASER, R. & BASSOK, M. (1989). Learning theory and the study of instruction. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 631-666.
12. KATZ, S. & LESGOLD, A. (1993). The role of the tutor in computer-based collaborative learning situations. In S. LAJOIE & S. DERRY, Eds. Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. LAJOIE, S. & DERRY, S. (Eds). (1993). Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. MARSHALL, S. P., PRIBE, C. A. & SMITH, J. D. (1987). Schema knowledge structures for representing and understanding arithmetic story problems. Contract No. N00014-85-K-0661. San Diego, CA: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education.
15. MEYER, B. J. F. (1975). The Organization of Prose and its Effects on Memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. MCARTHUR, D., STASZ, C. & ZMUIDZINAS, M. (1990). Tutoring techniques in algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 161-195.
17. NATHAN, M. J., KINTSCH, W. & YOUNG, E. (1990). A Theory of algebra word problem comprehension and its implications for unintelligent tutoring systems. ICS Technical Report #90-02. Bounder: Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
18. NORMAN, D. A. & SPOHRER, J. C. (1996). Learner-centered design: introduction. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 24-27.
19. PAPERT, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
20. REUSSER, K. (1993). Tutoring systems and pedagogical theory: representational tools for understanding, planning, and reflection in problem solving. In S. LAJOIE & S. DERRY, Eds. Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. SCHAUBLE, L., RAGHAVAN, K. & GLASER, R. (1993). The discovery and reflection notation: a graphical trace for supporting self regulation in computer-based laboratories. In S. LAJOIE & S. DERRY, Eds. Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. SCHOENFELD, A. H. (1983). Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem solving. In R. LESH & M. LANDAU, Eds. Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, pp. 229-258. New York: Academic Press.
23. SCHOFIELD, J. & VERBAN, D. (1988). Barriers and incentives to computer usage in teaching. Technical Report No. 1, Learning Research & Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
24. SCHWARTZ, D. G. (1989). Outline of a naive semantics for reasoning with qualitative linguistic information. Proceedings of IJCAI-89, Detroit, MI, USA, pp. 20-25.
25. SOLOWAY, E. (1990). Interactive learning environments. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Studies Institute, Calgary, Canada.
26. SOLOWAY, E. & PRYOR, A. (1996). Log on education: the next generation in human-computer interaction. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 16-18.
27. VAN LEHN, K. (1988). Toward a theory of impasse-driven learning. In H. MANDL & A. LESGOLD, Eds. Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 19-42. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of the Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.