Relation entre l'ajustement marital et des mesures subjectives et objectives de soutien conjugal

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 302-309

  Cormier, Natalie ^a   Julien, Danielle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030373939     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0008-400X.28.4.302     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amenson, C.S., & Lewinshon, P.M. (1981). An investigation into the observed sex differences in prevalence of unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 1-13.
2. Baucom, D.H., & Epstein, N. (1990). Cognitive-behavioral marital therapy. New York: Bruner/Mazel.
3. Fincham, F.D., Beach, S.R., & Baucom, D.H. (1987). Attribution processes in distressed and non distressed couples: 4. Self-partner attribution differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 739-748.
4. Fincham, F.D., Bradbury, T.N., & Scott, C.K. (1990). Cognition in marriage. The psychology of marriage (pp. 118-149). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
6. Floyd, F.J., & Markman, H.J. (1983). Observational biases in spouse observation: Toward a cognitive/behavioral model of marriage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 450-457.
7. Gottman, J.M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(1), 57-75.
8. Guthrie, D.M., & Noller, P. (1988). Spouses' perception of one another in emotional situations. In P. Noller & M.A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 153-181). Cleveland, Philadelphie: Multilingual Matters.
9. Julien, D. (1992, July). Expanding marital adjustment theories: What if marriage were fun? In H. Hops (Chair), Beyond current behavioural marital theory: Complacency be gone. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Fourth World Congress on Behavior Therapy, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
10. Julien, D., Chartrand, E., Pizzamiglio, M.T., Léveillé, S., & Bouthillier, D. (1990). Système de codification d'interactions de soutien. Document inédit, Université du Québec à Montréal.
11. Julien, D., Markman, H.J., & Lindahl, K. (1989). A comparison of a global and a microanalytic coding system: Future trends in studying interactions. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 81-100.
12. Julien, D., & Markman, H.J. (1991). Social support and social network as determinants of individual and marital outcomes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 549-568.
13. Kessler, R.C., Price, R.H., & Wortman, C.B. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 531-572.
14. Locke, H.J., & Wallace, K.M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction test: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251-255.
15. Margolin, G. (1987). Participant observation procedures in marital and family assessment. In T. Jacob (Ed.), Family interaction and psychopathology: Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 391-426). New York: Plenum.
16. Margolin, G., Hattem, D., John, R.S., & Yost, K. (1985). Perceptual agreement between spouses and outside observers when coding themselves and a stranger dyad. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 235-247.
17. Margolin, G., & Wampold, B.E. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554-567.
18. Miller, G.E., & Bradbury, T.N. (1995). Relining the association between attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(2), 196-208.
19. Noller, P., & Ruzzene, M. (1991). Communication in marriage: The influence of affect and cognition. In G.O. Fletcher & F.D. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 203-223). Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
20. Notarius, C.I., Benson, P.R., & Sloane, D. (1989). Exploring the interface between perception and behavior: An analysis of marital interaction in distressed and nondistressed couples. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 39-64.
21. O'Farrell, T.J., & Birchler, G.R. (1987). Marital relationships of alcoholic, conflicted, and nonconflicted couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 259-274.
22. Pizzamiglio, T. (1992). Différences reliées au sexe dans les interactions de soutien chez les couples ajustés: Comparaison entre couples hétérosexuels, gais et lesbiens. Mémoire de maîtrise inédit, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec, Canada.
23. Robinson, E.A., & Price, M.G. (1980). Pleasurable behavior in marital interaction: An observational study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 117-118.
24. Schapp, C. (1984). A comparison of the interaction of distressed and nondistressed couples in a labotary situation: Literature survey, methodological issues, and an empirical investigation. In K. Hahlweg & N.S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 159-181). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
26. Surra, C.A., & Ridley, C.A. (1991). Multiple perspectives on interaction: Participants, peers, and observers. In B.M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 35-55). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Turner, H.A. (1994). Gender and social support: Taking the bad with the good ? Sex Roles, 30(7-8), 521-541.
28. Weiss, R.L. (1984). Cognitive and behavioral measures of marital interaction. In K. Hahlweg & N.S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 232-251). New York: Guilford Press.
29. Weiss, R.S. (1990). Bringing work stress home. In J. Eckenrode & S. Gore (Eds.), Stress between work and family (pp. 17-37). New York: Plenum Press.