Teachers' thinking elicited from interactive multimedia professional development courseware

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 7-22

  Putt, Ian ^a   Henderson, Lyn ^b   Patching, William ^b  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030370316     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02299818     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
2. Dahlgren, L.O. (1978). Qualitative differences in conceptions of basic principles in economics: A contribution to the discussion of the validity of examination results. Paper presented to the Fourth International Conference on Higher Education, University of Lancaster.
3. Gibbs, G., Lockwood, F., Morgan, A., & Taylor, E. (1982). Student learning and course design 1: In-text teaching devices in Open University texts (Study Methods Group Report No. 12). Milton Keynes: Open University.
4. Harel, I. (1991). Children designers: Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
5. Henderson, L., Patching, W., & Putt, I. (1994). The impact of metacognitive interactive strategies and prompts embedded in interactive multimedia in a cross-cultural context: An exploratory investigation. In OPEN LEARNING '94, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Open Learning, (pp. 181-186). Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Open Learning Network & The University of Queensland.
6. Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (in press). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (Chapter 24). New York: Scholastic Press in collaboration with the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
7. Kozma, R.B. (1994) Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.
8. Krendl, K.A., & Lieberman, D.A. (1988). Computers and learning: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(4), 367-389.
9. Litchfield, B.C. (1992). Evaluation of inquiry-based science software and interactive multimedia programs. Computing Teacher, 19(6), 41-43.
10. Lockwood, F. (1990). Activities in distance learning texts. Unpublished PhD thesis, Open University.
11. Marland, P.W. (1984). Stimulated recall from video: Its use in research on the thought processes of classroom participants. In O. Zuber-Skerrit (Ed.), Video in higher education (pp. 156-165). London: Kogan Page.
12. Marland, P.W., Patching. W.G., & Putt, I.J. (1992). Learning from text: Glimpses inside the minds of distance learners. Townsville: James Cook University of North Queensland.
13. Marland, P., Patching, W., Putt, I., & Putt, R. (1990). Distance learners' interactions with text while studying. Distance Education, 11(1), 71-91.
14. Marland, P.W., Patching, W.G., Putt, I.J., & Store, R.E. (1984). Learning from distance-teaching materials: A study of students' mediating responses. Distance Education, 5(2), 71-91.
15. Parer, M.S. (1988). Textual design and student learning. Churchill, Vic.: Gippsland Institute of Advanced Education.
16. Patching, W., Henderson, L., & Putt, I. (1994). Interactive multimedia and thinking: A report on research in progress. In C. McBeath & R. Atkinson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Interactive Multimedia Symposium (pp. 389-397). Perth, Western Australia: Promaco Conventions Pty. Ltd.
17. Reeve, R.A., Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1987). Everyday and academic thinking: Implications for learning and problem solving. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(2), 123-133.
18. Reeves, T.C. (1992). Effective dimensions of interactive learning systems. Information Technology for Training and Education Conference (ITTE '92) (pp. 99-113). St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
19. Reeves, T.C. (1995). Questioning the questions of instructional technology research. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Research and Theory Division (pp. 459-470). Anaheim, CA: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Research and Theory Division.
20. Reiser, R., & Kegelmann, H. (1994). Evaluating instructional software: A review and critique of current methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 63-69.
21. Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research. Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10-18.
22. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Educational Psychology, 80(4), 620-627.
23. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). (pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
24. Thornberg, D.G., & Pea, R.D. (1991). Synthesizing instructional technologies and educational culture: Exploring cognition and metacognition in the social studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(2), 121-164.
25. Weinstein, C.E., & Mayer, R.E. 1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
26. White, B. (1993). Social justice explored [CD-ROM]. Townsville: Queensland State Education Department.